Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 27, SUPPLEMENT 1, 46-50, 1996

Clinical experience with two types of pelvic C-clamps for unstable pelvic ring injuries

  • M. Schütz
    Correspondence
    Address for correspondence: Dr. Michael Schütz Unfall- and Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Humboldt Universität Virchow Klinikum Augustenburger Platz 1 D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    Affiliations
    Unfall- and Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • U. Stöckle
    Affiliations
    Unfall- and Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • R. Hoffmann
    Affiliations
    Unfall- and Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • N. Südkamp
    Affiliations
    Unfall- and Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • N. Haas
    Affiliations
    Unfall- and Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The emergency stabilization of unstable pelvic injuries, in particular, injuries to the posterior pelvic ring, can be achieved following reduction by application of the pelvic C-clamp. This and other procedures contribute to controlling what is almost always a life-threatening blood loss. The pelvic C-clamp is a temporary measure preceding definitive treatment of the injury. If this procedure is to have an optimal and lasting effect, the clamp must be applied correctly, provide adequate compression and stability, and be easy to handle. In one year, we applied the AO and ACE pelvic clamps in 9 clinical cases. Satisfactory primary compression and stability were achieved for unstable injuries with both clamps. It was more difficult to achieve good rotational stability as required for subsequent treatment with the ACE clamp due to its construction design.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ganz R.
        • Krushell R.J.
        • Jakob R.P.
        • Küffer J.
        The antishock pelvic clamp.
        Clin. Orthop. 1991; 267: 106-116
        • Evers B.M.
        • Cryer H.M.
        • Miller F.B.
        Pelvic fracture hemorrhage. Priorities in management.
        Arch. Surg. 1989; 124: 422-424
        • Mucha Jr, P.
        • Farnell M.B.
        Analysis of pelvic fracture management.
        J. Trauma. 1984; 24: 379-386
        • Witschger P.
        • Heini P.
        • Ganz R.
        Beckenzwinge zur Schockbekampfung bei hinteren Beckenringverletzungen.
        Orthopäde. 1992; 21: 393-399
        • Isler B.
        • Ganz R.
        Klassifikation der Beckenringverletzungen.
        Unfallchirugie. 1990; 93: 289