Advertisement
Paper| Volume 28, ISSUE 4, P279-281, May 1997

A more stable posterior approach for hemiarthroplasty of the hip

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The dislocation rate following the insertion of a hemiarthroplasty of the hip via the posterior approach is variously quoted as between 8 per cent and 15 per cent. We set out to determine if this could be reduced by preserving the labrum and capsular structures at the time of surgery. We used a modification of the posterior approach, in which the labrum and capsule are preserved which appears not to have been widely reported. This increases the stability of the joint by adding to the depth of the acetabulum. We looked prospectively at a series of 150 patients who were treated with an Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty using this technique. There were only two dislocations within 1 year of surgery in the series (one of these being in a patient with a dysplastic acetabulum) making our dislocation rate 1.3 per cent. We conclude that preserving the labrum significantly increases the stability of a hemiarthroplasty when it is inserted via a posterior approach.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chan RNW
        • Hoskinson J
        Thompson prosthesis for fractured neck of femur.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1975; 57B: 437
        • Blewitt N
        • Mortimore S
        Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur.
        Injury. 1992; 23: 320
        • Moore AT
        The self locking metal hip prosthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1957; 39A: 811
        • Paton RW
        • Hirst P
        Hemiarthroplasty of the hip and dislocation.
        Injury. 1989; 20: 167
        • Unwin AJ
        • Thomas M
        Dislocation after hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a comparison of the dislocation rate after posterior and lateral approaches to the hip.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994; 76: 327
        • Maxwell HA
        • Turner PG
        Dislocation of the Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty: is closed manipulation justified?.
        J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994; 39: 370
        • Osborne RP
        The approach to the hip joint: a critical review and a suggested new route.
        Br J Surg. 1930; 18: 49
        • Moore AT
        The Moore self locking Vitallium prosthesis in fresh femoral neck fractures.
        Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect. 1959; 16: 309
        • Iyer KM
        A new posterior approach to the hip joint.
        Injury. 1982; 13: 76
        • Gibson A
        Posterior exposure of the hip joint.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1950; 32B: 183
        • Marcy GH
        • Fletcher RS
        Modification of the posterolateral approach to the hip for insertion of femoral head prosthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1954; 36A: 142
        • Last RJ
        7th Ed. Anatomy: Regional and Applied. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1984: 149