This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
To determine the causes and consequences of any delay from the onset of symptoms to
diagnosis, 1108 consecutive patients with an acute proximal femoral fracture were
prospectively studied. In 154 cases (13.9 per cent) the diagnosis was delayed more
than 24 h from the onset of symptoms. The reason for this was due to failure to seek
medical help in 63 patients. For the 91 patients who were seen by a medical practioner,
60 were not X-rayed straight away. For those cases where a radiographic examination
was requested, the fracture was invisible in only nine cases, of which six subsequently
displaced. The diagnosis was more likely to be delayed if the fracture occurred spontaneously,
the patient fell inside, or the fracture was intracapsular. Delay in diagnosis was
not associated with an increase in mortality but there was a significant increase
in the risk of pressure sores.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to InjuryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Delayed diagnosis of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.Age Aging. 1987; 16: 378
- Hip fractures in healthy patients: operative delay versus prognosis.Br Med J. 1986; 293: 1203
- The timing of surgery for proximal femoral fractures.J Bone Joint Surg. 1992; 74B: 203
- Evaluation of a ten-question mental test in the institutionalised elderly.Age Aging. 1974; 3: 152
- Bone scanning for suspected hip fractures.J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1987; 69B: 251
- Pitfalls of bone scintigraphy in suspected hip fractures.Br J Radiol. 1991; 64: 403
- Imaging of the hip joint-computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1992; 274: 135
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
November 24,
1996
Identification
Copyright
© 1997 Published by Elsevier Inc.
