Paper| Volume 28, ISSUE 3, P165-167, April 1997

Download started.


An audit of trauma documentation

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Research into aspects of the care of the injured depends on accurate and complete documentation. Inadequate records make audit almost impossible and are unacceptable medico-legally. An audit was made of the standard of trauma documentation in the Yorkshire region before the introduction of trauma charts in 1992. After it was established that a problem did exist, an audit was made of the standard of documentation before and after introduction of trauma charts in one city teaching hospital. Case notes were inspected for completeness of documentation of respiratory, circulatory and neurological status. Results from 1988–1989 showed that only 39.4 per cent of notes recorded the four parameters under investigation. In 1992–1994 the standard had improved. Without trauma charts documentation increased to 90 per cent, but with trauma charts in primary referrals the result improved to 97 per cent. Only 56 per cent of notes were complete for tertiary referrals when a trauma chart was not used. The standard of documentation in major injuries improved with the use of trauma charts. It is recommended that trauma charts are used routinely for all primary and tertiary referrals of injured patients. Tertiary referral patients should be reassessed fully after hospital transfer and a new trauma chart completed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Royal College of Surgeons of England Commission on the Provision of Surgical Services
        2nd Ed. Report of the Working Party on the Management of Patients with Major Injuries. RCSE, London1988
        • Airey CM
        • Franks AJ
        Major trauma workload within an English Health Region.
        Injury. 1995; 26: 25
        • Macey AC
        • et al.
        The M1 aircraft crash disaster documentation: lessons and prospects?.
        in: 2nd Ed. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] Orthop Proc. 72B. 1990: 1089
        • Ross AC
        • Bishay M
        The collection of research data: don't ask the houseman.
        in: 2nd Ed. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] Orthop Proc. 76B. 1994: 46 (Suppl. 1)
        • Schoenfeld PS
        Documentation in the paediatric emergency department: a review of resuscitation cases.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1991; 20: 641
        • Frazier HW
        • Brand DA
        Emergency department trauma care: priorities and documentation.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1980; 60: 1009
        • Walters BC
        • McNeill I
        Improving the record of patient assessment in the trauma room.
        J Trauma. 1990; 30: 398
        • Over D
        • Finch M
        The development of new documentation for use in cases of major trauma.
        Injury. 1991; 22: 139
        • Airey CM
        • Franks AJ
        2nd Ed. The Epidemiology of Major Trauma in the Yorkshire Health Region. University of Leeds School of Public Health, Leeds1992