Paper| Volume 28, ISSUE 3, P209-212, April 1997

Download started.


A prospective trial to compare three anaesthetic techniques used for the reduction of fractures of the distal radius

  • L. Funk
    Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Mr L. Funk, frcs, 39 Bottom O'Th'Moor, Horwich, Lancashire BL6 6QF, UK.
    Bolton Royal Infirmary, Bolton, Lancashire, UK
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      The aim of this study was to compare prospectively haematoma blocks alone and haematoma blocks with sedation with general anaesthesia for the reduction of distal radius fractures in adult patients, with respect to pain perception before, during and after manipulation using a visual analogue scale, radiological position, waiting time, procedure time and cost. Fifty-eight adult patients with closed, displaced distal radius fractures were included in the study. Pain experienced during manipulation was greatest in patients who received haematoma blocks alone compared with the other two groups. Post-manipulation pain was significantly greater in patients who received a general anaesthetic. Radiological correction was as good in those patients receiving a haematoma block with or without sedation as a general anaesthetic. The waiting and manipulation times and resource costs were greater in those receiving a general anaesthetic. There were no complications related to any of these anaesthetic methods. Patient acceptance is greater with a correctly performed haematoma block and sedation technique compared to general anaesthesia. It is also more efficient with regard to time and the resources required. This is particularly important for a progressively increasing ambulatory, elderly population who require prompt, safe, effective and painless management.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Charnley J
        3rd Ed. The Closed Treatment of Common Fractures. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1972
        • Meinig RP
        • Quick A
        • Lobmeyer L
        Plasma lidocaine levels following hematoma block for distal radius fractures.
        J Orthop Trauma. 1989; 3: 187
        • Johnson PQ
        • Noffsinger MA
        Haematoma block of distal forearm fractures, is it safe?.
        Orthop Rev. 1991; 20: 977
        • Singh GK
        • Manglik RK
        • Lakhtakia PK
        • Singh A
        Analgesia for the reduction of Colles fracture. A comparison of hematoma block and intravenous sedation.
        Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1992; (Doc No 23)
        • Case RD
        Haematoma block — a safe method of reducing Colles' fractures.
        Injury. 1985; 16: 469
        • Hennrikus WL
        • Shin AY
        • Klingelberger CE
        Self-administered nitrous oxide and a hematoma block for analgesia in the outpatient reduction of fractures in children.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1995; 77A: 335