Paper| Volume 27, ISSUE 9, P643-645, November 1996

Chiropractic treatment of chronic ‘whiplash’ injuries

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Forty-three per cent of patients will suffer long-term symptoms following ‘whiplash’ injury, for which no conventional treatment has proven to be effective. A retrospective study was undertaken to determine the effects of chiropractic in a group of 28 patients who had been referred with chronic ‘whiplash’ syndrome. The severity of patients' symptoms was assessed before and after treatment using the Gargan and Bannister (1990) classification. Twenty-six (93 per cent) patients improved following chiropractic treatment (U = 34, P < 0.001). The encouraging results from this retrospective study merit the instigation of a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare conventional with chiropractic treatment in chronic ‘whiplash’ injury.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bannister G
        • Gargan M
        Prognosis of whiplash injuries — a review of the literature.
        in: 9th Ed. Spine: State of the Art Reviews. Vol. 7. Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia1993: 112
        • Gargan MF
        • Bannister GC
        The rate of recovery following whiplash injury.
        Eur Spine J. 1994; 3: 162
        • Barnsley L
        • Lord S
        • Bogduk N
        Whiplash injury — clinical review.
        Pain. 1994; 58: 283
        • Bogduk N
        Post whiplash syndrome.
        Aust Fam Physician. 1994; 23: 2303
        • Gargan MF
        • Bannister GC
        Long term prognosis of soft tissue injuries of the neck.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1990; 72: 901
      1. Haldeman S Principles and Practice of Chiropractic. Appleton and Lange, Connecticut1991: 125
        • Voss DE
        9th Ed. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation: Patterns and Techniques. Harper and Row: Plymbridge Distribution, Scranton, PA1985
        • Clayton EB
        9th Ed. Clayton's Electrotherapy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1995
        • Frankel HL
        • et al.
        The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia.
        J Paraplegia. 1969; 7: 179
        • Meade TW
        • Dyer S
        • Browne W
        • Frank AO
        Randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management for low back pain; results from extended follow up.
        Br Med J. 1995; 311: 349
        • Murphy M
        • Lieponis J
        Non-operative treatment of cervical spine pain.
        (The Cervical Spine-Research Society Editorial Committee)in: 2nd Ed. Lippincott, Philadelphia1994: 670
        • Frisoni GB
        • Anzola GP
        Vertebrobasilar ischemia after neck motion.
        Stroke. 1991; 22: 1452
        • Lee KP
        • Carlini WG
        • McCormick GF
        • Albers GW
        Neurologic complications following chiropractic manipulation: a survey of California neurologists.
        Neurology. 1995; 45: 1213
        • Winer C
        Spinal manipulation in current medical practice.
        Patient Management. 1992; 16: 43
        • Dvorak J
        • Orelli F
        How dangerous is manipulation to the cervical spine?.
        Manual Med. 1985; 2: 1
        • Terrett AGJ
        Misuse of the literature by medical authors in discussing spinal manipulative therapy injury.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 203