Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 2, ISSUE 2, P107-115, October 1970

Download started.

Ok

Factors influencing the primary mortality in the treatment of hip fractures

  • E.B. Riska
    Correspondence
    Requests for reprints should be addressed to:—Dr. E. B. Riska, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Central Hospital, Helsinki 26, Finland.
    Affiliations
    Surgical Department, Koskela Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      Factors influencing the primary mortality of patients with fractures of the neck of the femur have been reviewed by studying 470 cases treated at the Surgical Department of Koskela Hospital, Helsinki. Of these patients, 49 were male and 421 female. The average age of the patients was 77.4 years. One hundred and twelve patients were treated conservatively with traction and bed-rest and 358 were treated by operation. The surgery consisted of reduction and internal fixation in 236 cases, and replacement of the head with a prosthesis in 122 cases.
      At the time of injury, 50 per cent of the patients were suffering from arteriosclerosis, 22.7 per cent from mental disorders, 201 had heart disease requiring digitalization, 43 cases had disturbances in their blood-pressure, 31 had a history of previous cerebrovascular accidents, 56 were suffering from diabetes mellitus and 49 from chronic renal disease, 43 had malignant disease, and 17 were suffering from chronic rheumatoid arthritis.
      The primary mortality was defined as death occurring within 1 month of the injury or operation. The total primary mortality amounted to 87 patients, which was 18.5 per cent of the series. All but 5 patients who died were examined at post-mortem. In 25 per cent the cause of death was bronchopneumonia or hypostatic pneumonia, in 19.5 per cent it was due to pulmonary embolism, in 12.6 per cent to a cerebrovascular accident, and in 9.2 per cent to coronary thrombosis. Six patients died of malignant tumours and a further 6 of uncompensated cardiac disease.
      The primary mortality was greater among those treated conservatively. This might be taken as evidence in favour of surgery, but the average age of the patients treated conservatively was 3 years higher and their poor general condition was the main reason why surgery was not undertaken. Among the patients treated surgically, mortality increased with age though it remained significantly lower than in the corresponding age-groups which were treated conservatively. In the groups over 85 years, however, the difference was no longer significant. The primary mortality was not related to the type of fracture nor to the method of surgical treatment.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alffram P.-A.
        An Epidemiologic Study of Cervical and Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur in an Urban Population.
        Acta orthop. scand. 1964;
        • Banks H.H.
        Factors influencing the Result in Fractures of the Femoral Neck.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1962; 44A: 931
        • Eigenthaler L.
        • Möseneder H.
        Ergebnisse der mit dem Böhler-Nagel operierten Schenkelhalsbrüche.
        Hft. Unfallheilk. 1968; 97: 67
        • Graham J.
        Early or Delayed Weight-bearing after Internal Fixation of Transcervical Fracture of the Femur.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1968; 50B: 562
        • Hinchey J.J.
        • Day P.L.
        Primary Prosthetic Replacement in Fresh Femoral-neck Fractures. A Review of 294 Consecutive Cases.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1964; 46A: 223
        • Jewett E.L.
        Rigid Internal Fixation of Intracapsular Neck Fractures.
        Am. J. Surg. 1956; 91: 621
        • Kennedy J.C.
        • McFarlane M.
        • McLachlin A.D.
        The Moe Plate in Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1957; 39B: 451
        • Leikkonen O.
        Fractures in the Femoral Neck.
        Annls Chir. Gynaec. Fenn. 1962;
        • Lunceford E.M.
        Use of the Moore Self-locking Vitallium Prosthesis in Acute Fractures of the Femoral Neck.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1965; 47A: 832
        • McLaughlin H.L.
        An Adjustable Internal Fixation Element for the Hip.
        Am. J. Surg. 1947; 73: 150
        • Newell C.E.
        The Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures.
        Am. J. Surg. 1947; 73: 162
        • Niemand K.M.W.
        • Mankin H.J.
        Fractures about the Hip in an Institutionalized Patient Population. II, Survival and Ability to walk again.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1968; 50A: 1281
        • Nyström G.
        Further Experiences with Osteosynthesis of Medial Fractures of the Femoral Neck with the Aid of Three Nails (“Multiple Nailing”) with Special Reference to the Indications for Reconstructive Operations on the Hip-Joint.
        Acta chir. scand. 1954; 107: 89
        • Öhman U.
        • Björkegren N.-Å.
        • Fahlström G.
        Trochanteric Fracture of the Femur.
        Acta chir. scand. 1968; 134: 543
        • Reno J.H.
        • Burlington H.
        Fractures of the Hip—A Mortality Survey.
        Am. J. Surg. 1958; 95: 581
        • Smith-Petersen M.N.
        • Cave E.F.
        • Vangorder G.W.
        Intracapsular Fractures of the Neck of the Femur. Treatment by Internal Fixation.
        Archs Surg., Chicago. 1931; 23: 715
        • Smyth E.H.J.
        • Ellis J.S.
        • Manifold M.C.
        • Dewey P.R.
        Triangle Pinning for Fracture of the Femoral Neck.
        J. Bone Jt Surg. 1964; 46: 664