Advertisement

Letter to the editor: What makes fixation of femoral neck fractures fail? A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors

  • Takanori Miura
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tazawako Hospital, 17-1 Ukiyozaka Obonai, Tazawako, Semboku, Akita, 014-1201, Japan

    Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), 1-7-7 Koraibashi, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-0043, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Norio Yamamoto
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Miyamoto Orthopedic Hospital, 4-2-63, Kunitomi, Naka-ku, Okayama 773-8236, Japan.
    Affiliations
    Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), 1-7-7 Koraibashi, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-0043, Japan

    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Miyamoto Orthopedic Hospital, Okayama 773-8236, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yosuke Tomita
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki 370-0033, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 04, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.01.006
      Dear Editor,
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kalsbeek J.H.
        • van Donkelaar M.F.
        • Krijnen P.
        • Roerdink W.H.
        • de Groot R.
        • Schipper I.B.
        What makes fixation of femoral neck fractures fail? A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors [published online ahead of print, 2022 Nov 16].
        Injury. 2022; (S0020-1383(22)00872-5)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.11.042
        • Hayden J.A.
        • van der Windt D.A.
        • Cartwright J.L.
        • Côté P.
        • Bombardier C.
        Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.
        Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 280-286https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Vist G.E.
        • Glasziou P.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Skoetz N.
        • et al.
        Chapter 14: completing ‘summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence.
        in: Higgins JPT Thomas J Chandler J Cumpston M Li T Page MJ Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022 (Available from)
        • Guyatt G.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Kunz R.
        • Brozek J.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Rind D.
        • et al.
        Corrigendum to GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1283-1293.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 137: 265https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.014
        • Santesso N.
        • Glenton C.
        • Dahm P.
        • Garner P.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Alper B.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 119: 126-135https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014