Advertisement

Validation of a proposed radiographic bone defect classification system

      Highlights

      • A skeletal defects classification scheme is an important step towards standardising the assessment of these complex injuries.
      • Interobserver reliability testing demonstrated the proposed classification system had substantial agreement between observers.
      • Intraobserver variability showed a range of substantial to almost perfect agreement of each observer following a three-week interval.
      • The classification scheme is based primarily on conventional orthogonal radiographs, requiring no sophisticated technology or elaborate calculations.
      • The distinction between the various elements of the classification scheme are consistent with the prior orthopaedic trauma literature.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To clinically validate a recently proposed classification scheme of post-traumatic bone defects.

      Methods and materials

      Open fractures were classified utilising a newly introduced classification system. This classification system is based on plain radiographs, assessing the extent and local geometry of bone loss, including: D1 - Incomplete Defects; D2 - Minor/Sub-Critical (Complete) Defects (<2 cm); and D3 - Segmental/Critical Sized Defects ( 2 cm). Reliability was assessed among six independent assessors (three trauma orthopaedic surgeons and three orthopaedic training surgeons) using Fleiss’ kappa tests. 43 open fractures from a tertiary referral trauma centre and their radiographic series were analysed.

      Results

      Interobserver reliability testing demonstrated the proposed classification system had substantial agreement between the 6 observers, κ = 0.623 (z = 33.8), p < 0.001. Intraobserver variability showed a range of substantial to almost perfect agreement of each observer following a three-week interval between repeat assessments, κ range 0.69–0.914, p < 0.001.

      Conclusions

      In this representative validation cohort there was substantial agreement between observers when assessing a diverse range of bone defects following long bone open trauma, with highly reproducible assessments by both orthopaedic surgeons and trainee orthopaedic surgeons alike on an internal level. The classification scheme is based on conventional orthogonal radiographs and requires no sophisticated technology, and is therefore pragmatic and applicable to secondary, tertiary and quaternary levels of care for trauma patients.

      Level of Evidence

      III

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Toogood P.
        • Miclau T.
        Critical-sized bone defects.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: S23-S26https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000980
        • Mauffrey C.
        • Hak D.J.
        Tibial defect reconstruction.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: S1-S2https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000975
        • Tetsworth K.D.
        • Burnand H.G.
        • Hohmann E.
        • Glatt V.
        Classification of bone defects: an extension of the orthopaedic trauma association open fracture classification.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2021; 35: 71-76https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001896
        • DeCoster T.A.
        • Gehlert R.J.
        • Mikola E.A.
        • Pirela-Cruz M.A
        Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects.
        J Am Acad Orthop Sur. 2004; 12: 28-38https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200401000-00005
        • Johnson J.P.
        • Karam M.
        • Schisel J.
        • Agel J.
        An evaluation of the OTA-OFC system in clinical practice.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30: 579-583https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000648
        • Wu M.
        • Chen G.
        • Li Y.P.
        TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease.
        Bone Res. 2016; 4: 16009https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2016.9
        • der Merwe L van
        • F Birkholtz
        • Tetsworth K.
        • Hohmann E
        Functional and psychological outcomes of delayed lower limb amputation following failed lower limb reconstruction.
        Inj. 2016; 47: 1756-1760https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.027
        • Pollak A.N.
        • Ficke J.R.
        Introduction extremity war injuries: challenges in definitive reconstruction.
        J Am Acad Orthop Sur. 2008; 16: 626-627https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200811000-00002
        • Tetsworth K.
        • Paley D.
        • Sen C.
        • Jaffe M.
        • Maar D.C.
        • Glatt V.
        • et al.
        Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial non-unions with bone defects.
        Inj. 2017; 48: 2276-2284https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.018
        • Schemitsch E.H.
        Size matters.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: S20-S22https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000978
      1. OTA open fracture classification (OTA-OFC).
        J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32: S106https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001064
        • Meinberg E.
        • Agel J.
        • Roberts C.
        • Karam M.
        • Kellam J.
        Fracture and dislocation classification compendium – 2018.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32: S1-10https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001063
        • Dye N.B.
        • Vagts C.
        • Manson T.T.
        • O'Toole R.V
        Estimation of Tibial shaft defect volume using standard radiographs: development and validation of a novel technique.
        Inj. 2015; 46: 299-307https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.005
        • Koch G.K.
        • Landis J.R.
        • Freeman J.L.
        • Jr D.H.F.
        • Lehnen R.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; : 133-158
        • Gamer M.
        • Lemon J.
        • Fellows I.
        • Singh P.
        irr: various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.
        R Package Version 0. 2019; 84
        • Team R.C.
        R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
        Vienna R Found Statist Comput. 2021;
        • Tetsworth K.
        • Woloszyk A.
        • Glatt V.
        3D printed titanium cages combined with the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of segmental femoral defects.
        Ota Int. 2019; 2: e016https://doi.org/10.1097/oi9.0000000000000016
        • Chaddha M.
        • Gulati D.
        • Singh A.P.
        • Singh A.P.
        • Maini L.
        Management of massive posttraumatic bone defects in the lower limb with the Ilizarov technique.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 2010; 76: 811-820
        • Karanicolas P.J.
        • Bhandari M.
        • Walter S.D.
        • Heels-Ansdell D.
        • Sanders D.
        • Schemitsch E.
        • et al.
        Interobserver reliability of classification systems to rate the quality of femoral neck fracture reduction.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23: 408-412https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e31815ea017
        • Wing N.
        • Zyl N.V.
        • Wing M.
        • Corrigan R.
        • Loch A.
        • Wall C.
        Reliability of three radiographic classification systems for knee osteoarthritis among observers of different experience levels.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2021; : 399-405https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03551-4
        • Abedi A.
        • Mokkink L.B.
        • Zadegan S.A.
        • Paholpak P.
        • Tamai K.
        • Wang J.C.
        • et al.
        Reliability and validity of the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification system: a systematic review.
        Global Spine J. 2019; 9: 231-242https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218806847
        • Krappinger D.
        • Kaser V.
        • Kammerlander C.
        • Neuerburg C.
        • Merkel A.
        • Lindtner R.A.
        Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.
        Inj. 2019; 50: 337-343https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.027
        • Stafford P.R.
        • Norris B.L.
        Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases.
        Inj. 2010; 41: S72-S77https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(10)70014-0
        • Group OTAOFS
        A new classification scheme for open Fractures.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 8: 457-465
        • Haines N.M.
        • Lack W.D.
        • Seymour R.B.
        • Bosse M.J.
        Defining the lower limit of a “critical bone defect” in open diaphyseal tibial fractures.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30: e158-e163https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000531
        • Paley D.
        • Catagni M.A.
        • Argnani F.
        • Villa A.
        • Bijnedetti G.B.
        • Cattaneo R
        Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss.
        Clin Orthop Relat R. 1989; 241: 146-165https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198904000-00017
        • Tetsworth K.D.
        • Dlaska C.E.
        The art of tibial bone transport using the ilizarov fixator.
        Techniques Orthop. 2015; 30: 142-155https://doi.org/10.1097/bto.0000000000000136