Highlights
- •Of those patients who underwent nonunion reconstruction of the humerus utilizing a lateral paratricipital approach, zero patients (0/16) developed a postoperative radial nerve palsy (RNP).
- •Our overall rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy is consistent with the current literature; however, to our knowledge, our study is the first to include, analyze, and report the rate of postoperative RNP in regards to utilizing the lateral paratricipital approach when addressing nonunion reconstruction of the humerus.
- •The data in our manuscript support the utilization of the lateral paratricipital approach as a surgeon controlled means of decreasing postoperative patient morbidity associated with postoperative RNP. Merits of this approach include triceps muscle preservation, radial nerve identification at the spiral groove, decompression of the nerve at the lateral intermuscular septum, and tension-free mobilization of the nerve for improved protection during manipulation and instrumentation.
- •There was an increased rate of RNP with a longer duration of time between initial treatment and nonunion reconstruction with use of the triceps splitting approach. This suggests that it may be advisable to utilize a lateral paratricipital, rather than triceps splitting approach, if a posterior approach is required when treating a nonunion in cases where there is a greater period of time from initial treatment to nonunion reconstruction.
Abstract
Background
Postoperative radial nerve palsy (RNP) is a well-known complication of nonunion reconstruction
of the humerus. The purpose of the current study is to determine if the surgical approach
for nonunion reconstruction of the humerus influences the rate of postoperative radial
nerve palsy.
Methods
A retrospective case-control study of all humeral shaft and extraarticular distal
humerus nonunion reconstructions performed between January 1, 2004, and August 31,
2021, was conducted. Patients included were over 18 years of age, had a non-pathologic
humerus fracture nonunion and had intact radial nerve function prior to nonunion reconstruction.
Exclusion criteria consisted of nonunions involving the proximal humerus, intraarticular
fractures, and reconstructive treatment procedures with either intramedullary nail
or external fixation methods. Perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed in
regard to the development of postoperative RNP. A subgroup analysis was performed
to assess the interaction of significant variables on the development of postoperative
RNP.
Results
The overall rate of postoperative RNP in this series was 6/53 (11%). However, no cases
of postoperative radial nerve palsy were observed in patients who underwent nonunion
reconstruction with a lateral paratricipital approach. A new RNP was seen in 4/9 (44%)
of those patients who underwent a triceps splitting approach, which was significantly
higher than those utilizing either an anterolateral approach (2/28, 7%) or a lateral
paratricipital approach (0/16, 0%, p = 0.007).
Discussion and conclusion
Our data suggests that the lateral paratricipital exposure decreases the risk of radial
nerve injury with nonunion reconstruction of the humerus. The lateral paratricipital
exposure offers the benefit of radial nerve exploration, decompression, neurolysis
and protection prior to fracture manipulation and instrumentation. This study shows
conventional approaches may predispose patients to a high rate of postoperative RNP,
similar to that in the literature.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to InjuryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy after humeral shaft nonunion repair: more common than you think.J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30: 256-261https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000525
- What is the real rate of radial nerve injury after humeral nonunion surgery?.J Orthop Trauma. 2020; 34: 441-446https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001755
- Outcome of locking compression plates in humeral shaft nonunions.Indian J Orthop. 2013; 47: 150-155https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.108899
- Revision with dynamic compression plate and cancellous bone graft for aseptic nonunion after surgical treatment of humeral shaft fracture.J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009; 67: 1393-1396https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31818c1595
- Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral non-unions: Radiological and functional results.Acta Orthop Belg. 2011; 77: 299-303
- Humeral shaft nonunions treated with fibular allograft and compression plating.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000; 29: 45-47
- Best care paradigm to optimize functionality after extra-articular distal humeral fractures in the young patient.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; 9: S116-S122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.002
- Cadaveric investigation on radial nerve strain using different posterior surgical exposures for extraarticular distal humeral ORIF: merits of nerve decompression through a lateral paratricipital exposure.J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: e43-e45https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000204
- Surgical exposures of the humerus.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14: 754-765https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200612000-00007
- Extensor mechanism-sparing paratricipital posterior approach to the distal humerus.J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17: 374-378https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200305000-00009
- Alternative operative exposures of the posterior aspect of the humeral diaphysis: with reference to the radial nerve.J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1996; 78: 1690-1695https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199611000-00008
- Two-plate fixation for humeral shaft non-unions.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17: 135-138https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900901700201
- The functional outcome of operative treatment of ununited fractures of the humeral diaphysis in older patients.J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1999; 81: 177-190https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199902000-00005
- Treatment of non-union of humerus diaphyseal fractures: a prospective study comparing interlocking nail and locking compression plate.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134: 947-953https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1973-0
- Comparison of three different treatment modalities in the management of humeral shaft nonunions (plates, unilateral, and circular external fixators).J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22: 248-257https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816c7b89
- Uninfected nonunion of the humeral diaphyses: Review of 21 patients treated with shingling, compression plate, and autologous bone graft.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96: 139-146https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.11.006
- Treatment of the humeral shaft aseptic nonunion using plate or unilateral external fixator.J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care. 2008; 64: 1290-1296https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3180582471
- Treatment of nonunion of humeral shaft fracture with dynamic compression plate and cancellous bone graft.J Chinese Med Assoc. 2005; 68: 73-76https://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70138-8
- Non-union of the humeral shaft treated by internal fixation.Int Orthop. 2002; 26: 214-216https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-002-0354-4
- Time from injury to surgical fixation of diaphyseal humerus fractures is not associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy.J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: 491-496https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000875
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 16, 2022
Accepted:
July 14,
2022
Identification
Copyright
Published by Elsevier Ltd.