Morphology of bony callus growth in healing of a sheep tibial osteotomy

Published:October 18, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.083

      Highlights

      • The progression of periosteal callus formation was quantified from weekly radiographs of long bone healing in a sheep model.
      • Under controlled fixation, bony callus had formed adjacent to the osteotomy site by two weeks, and grew outwards.
      • Although contrary to a common view of healing patterns, this is consistent with a role for bony callus in reducing interfragmentary strain.

      Abstract

      Long bone fractures typically heal via formation of an external callus, which helps stabilise the bone fragments. Callus composition and morphology influence the mechanical environment, which in turn regulates the progression of healing. Therefore characterising callus development over time is crucial in understanding this mechanobiological regulation. Although bony callus is often assumed to grow towards the fracture from either side, this is not consistent with observations from large animal studies and clinical cases. Therefore, we sought to quantify the morphology of bony callus over time in a large animal model.
      Sheep tibiae were x-rayed weekly over eight weeks following an osteotomy (n=5), with fixation allowing up to 10% axial displacement under normal weight-bearing. After scaling radiographs by known landmarks and normalising greyscales, bony callus boundaries were defined by manual segmentation. The lateral callus area and coordinates of its centroid were calculated from each image.
      The external callus initially formed adjacent to the osteotomy site. Over the first four weeks, callus growth from its outer surfaces was characterised by its centre of area moving outwards and away from the osteotomy, on both proximal and distal fragments. Subsequent weeks showed consolidation and resorption from the outer surface of the callus.
      Our approach allowed bony callus development to be tracked in individuals throughout healing. Contrary to the view that periosteal bone formation originates distant from the fracture, our data showed bony callus adjacent to the defect from early stages, followed by approximately concentric growth. This discrepancy highlights the need for data specific to experimental conditions, and particularly early stages of healing, for evaluating theoretical models of mechanical regulation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and PersonalCorporate R&D Professionals
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Einhorn TA.
        The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 335: S7-S21
        • Perren SM.
        Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 138: 175-196
      1. (121, 478-515))
        • Pauwels F.
        A new theory concerning the influence of mechanical stimuli on the differentiation of the supporting tissues.
        in: Pauwels F. Anat. Z. Entwickl Gesch Furlong R Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1960: 375-407 (1980)
        • Yamagishi M
        • Yoshimura Y.
        The biomechanics of fracture healing.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955; 37-A: 1035-1068
        • Carter DR
        • Blenman PR
        • Beaupré GS
        Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing.
        J Orthop Res. 1988; 6: 736-748https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100060517
        • Prendergast PJ
        • Huiskes R
        • Søballe K
        Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces.
        J Biomech. 1997; 30: 539-548https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00140-6
        • Claes L
        • Heigele CA.
        Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing.
        J Biomech. 1999; 32: 255-266https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00153-5
        • Gerstenfeld LC
        • Cullinane DM
        • Barnes GL
        • Graves DT
        • Einhorn TA
        Fracture healing as a post-natal developmental process: molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation.
        J Cell Biochem. 2003; 88 (873–84)https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10435
        • Schindeler A
        • McDonald MM
        • Bokko P
        • Little DG
        Bone remodeling during fracture repair: the cellular picture.
        Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008; 19: 459-466https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.004
        • Isaksson H.
        Recent advances in mechanobiological modeling of bone regeneration.
        Mech Res Commun. 2012; 42: 22-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.11.006
        • Lacroix D
        • Prendergast PJ.
        A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading.
        J Biomech. 2002; 35 (1163–71)https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00086-6
        • Manigrasso MB
        • O'Connor JP.
        Characterization of a closed femur fracture model in mice.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18: 687-695
        • Claes L
        • Maurer-Klein N
        • Henke T
        • Gerngross H
        • Melnyk M
        • Augat P
        Moderate soft tissue trauma delays new bone formation only in the early phase of fracture healing.
        J Orthop Res. 2006; 24: 1178-1185https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20173
        • Granero-Molto F
        • Weis JA
        • Miga MI
        • Landis B
        • Myers TJ
        • O'Rear L
        • et al.
        Regenerative effects of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells in fracture healing.
        Stem Cells. 2009; 27: 1887-1898https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.103
        • Raggatt LJ
        • Wullschleger ME
        • Alexander KA
        • Wu ACK
        • Millard SM
        • Kaur S
        • et al.
        Fracture healing via periosteal callus formation requires macrophages for both initiation and progression of early endochondral ossification.
        Am J Pathol. 2014; 184: 3192-3204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.08.017
        • Hagiwara Y
        • Dyment NA
        • Jiang X
        • Huang J
        • Ackert-Bicknell C
        • Adams DJ
        • et al.
        Fixation stability dictates the differentiation pathway of periosteal progenitor cells in fracture repair.
        J Orthop Res. 2015; 33: 948-956https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22816
        • Hiltunen A
        • Vuorio E
        • Aro HT
        A standardized experimental fracture in the mouse tibia.
        J Orthop Res. 1993; 11: 305-312https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100110219
        • Sarmiento A
        • Latta LL
        Periosteal fracture callus mechanics.
        in: Moore TM AAOS symposium on trauma to the leg and its sequelae. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co, 1981: 75-86
        • Stürmer KM
        Histologische Befunde der Frakturheilung unter Fixateur externe und ihre klinische Bedeutung.
        Unfallchirurgie. 1984; 10: 110-122https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02585799
        • Goodship AE
        • Kenwright J.
        The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985; 67: 650-655
        • Goodship AE
        • Watkins PE
        • Rigby HS
        • Kenwright J
        The role of fixator frame stiffness in the control of fracture healing. An experimental study.
        J Biomech. 1993; 26: 1027-1035
        • Claes L
        • Wolf S
        • Augat P
        Mechanische Einflüsse auf die Callusheilung.
        Chirurg. 2000; 71: 989-994
        • Epari DR
        • Schell H
        • Bail HJ
        • Duda GN
        Instability prolongs the chondral phase during bone healing in sheep.
        Bone. 2006; 38: 864-870https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.10.023
        • Vetter A
        • Epari DR
        • Seidel R
        • Schell H
        • Fratzl P
        • Duda GN
        • et al.
        Temporal tissue patterns in bone healing of sheep.
        J Orthop Res. 2010; 28: 1440-1447https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21175
        • Windolf M
        • Ernst M
        • Schwyn R
        • Perren S
        • Mathis H
        • Wilke M
        • et al.
        A biofeedback system for continuous monitoring of bone healing.
        in: Proceedings of the international conference on biomedical electronics and devices (BIODEVICES-2014), Angers, France: SCITEPRESS2014: 243-248https://doi.org/10.5220/0004913002430248
        • Perren SM
        • Cordey J.
        The concept of interfragmentary strain.
        in: Uhthoff HK Stahl Elvira Current concepts of internal fixation of fractures. New York: Springer-Verlag, Berlin1980: 63-77
        • Epari DR
        • Wehner T
        • Ignatius A
        • Schuetz MA
        • Claes LE
        A case for optimising fracture healing through inverse dynamization.
        Med Hypotheses. 2013; 81: 225-227https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.04.044
        • Gardner TN
        • Hardy J
        • Evans M
        • Kenwright J
        Temporal changes in dynamic inter fragmentary motion and callus formation in fractures.
        J Biomech. 1997; 30: 315-321
        • Simon U
        • Augat P
        • Utz M
        • Claes L
        A numerical model of the fracture healing process that describes tissue development and revascularisation.
        Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2011; 14 (79–9)https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2010.49986
        • Chen G
        • Niemeyer F
        • Wehner T
        • Simon U
        • Schuetz MA
        • Pearcy MJ
        • et al.
        Simulation of the nutrient supply in fracture healing.
        J Biomech. 2009; 42 (2575–83)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.010
        • Steiner M
        • Claes L
        • Ignatius A
        • Niemeyer F
        • Simon U
        • Wehner T
        Prediction of fracture healing under axial loading, shear loading and bending is possible using distortional and dilatational strains as determining mechanical stimuli.
        J R Soc Interface. 2013; 1020130389https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0389
        • Isaksson H
        • van Donkelaar CC
        • Huiskes R
        • Ito K
        Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: comparison with in vivo results.
        J Orthop Res. 2006; 24: 898-907https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20118
        • Isaksson H
        • van Donkelaar CC
        • Huiskes R
        • Ito K
        A mechano-regulatory bone-healing model incorporating cell-phenotype specific activity.
        J Theor Biol. 2008; 252: 230-246https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.01.030
        • Geris L
        • Sloten JV
        • Van Oosterwyck H
        Connecting biology and mechanics in fracture healing: an integrated mathematical modeling framework for the study of nonunions.
        Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2010; 9: 713-724https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0208-8
        • Aro H
        • Eerola E
        • Aho AJ
        Determination of callus quantity in 4-week-old fractures of the rat tibia.
        J Orthop Res. 1985; 3: 101-108
      2. Ren T, Dailey HL. Mechanoregulation modeling of bone healing in realistic fracture geometries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2020:1–16.

        • Wilson CJ
        • Schütz MA
        • Epari DR
        Effects of strain artefacts arising from a pre-defined callus domain in models of bone healing mechanobiology.
        Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015; 14: 1129-1141https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0659-z
        • McKibbin B.
        The biology of fracture healing in long bones.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978; 60-B: 150-162
        • Ribeiro FO
        • Folgado J
        • Garcia-Aznar JM
        • Gómez-Benito MJ
        • Fernandes PR
        Is the callus shape an optimal response to a mechanobiological stimulus?.
        Med Eng Phys. 2014; 36: 1508-1514https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.07.015
        • Vetter A
        • Liu Y
        • Witt F
        • Manjubala I
        • Sander O
        • Epari DR
        • et al.
        The mechanical heterogeneity of the hard callus influences local tissue strains during bone healing: a finite element study based on sheep experiments.
        J Biomech. 2011; 44: 517-523https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.009