Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 52, SUPPLEMENT 2, S72-S77, June 2021

Download started.

Ok

Synthetic and Bone tissue engineering graft substitutes: What is the future?

  • Author Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Rosa S. Valtanen
    Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St., Mailcode 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Yunzhi P. Yang
    Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St., Mailcode 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Geoffrey C. Gurtner
    Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    William J. Maloney
    Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St., Mailcode 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    David W. Lowenberg
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway St., Mailcode 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTCF).
Open AccessPublished:July 19, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.040

      Highlights

      • A history of conventional means for filling critical size bone defects using grafting and bone regeneration techniques.
      • An introduction as to what materials have so far been used for the creation of bone substitute and vascular augmentation substitutes for a composite bone and vascular void filler.
      • Possible future directions that will need to be considered in the successful creation of composite vascularized bone void fillers for segmental defects.

      Abstract

      The management of large segmental bone defects caused by trauma or disease remains clinically challenging within orthopaedics. The major impediment to bone healing with current treatment options is insufficient vascularization and incorporation of graft material. Lack of rapid adequate vascularization leads to cellular necrosis within the inner regions of the implanted material and a failure of bone regeneration. Current treatment options for critical size bone defects include the continued “gold standard” autograft, allograft, synthetic bone graft substitutes, vascularized fibular graft, induced membrane technique, and distraction osteogenesis. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) remains an exciting prospect for the treatment of large segmental bone defects; however, current clinical integration of engineered scaffolds remains low. We believe that the barrier to clinical application of bone tissue engineering constructs lies in the lack of concomitant vascularization of these scaffolds. This mini-review outlines the progress made and the significant limitations remaining in successful clinical incorporation of engineered synthetic bone substitutes for segmental defects.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Treatment of segmental bone defects following traumatic injury, Cierny-Mader Stage III and IV osteomyelitis, and en bloc tumor resections remains clinically challenging. It is our opinion that the main obstacle to successful segmental long bone defect filling when using grafting techniques, be they autograft or synthetic, is the lack of adequate vascularization of the implanted materials or tissue engineered constructs. Without adequate vascularization, the inner regions of the graft either undergo cellular necrosis (can be the case with large segmental autografts) or failure of proper cellular infiltration and regeneration, leading to graft failure [
      • Clark ER
      • Clark EL
      Microscopic observations on the growth of blood capillaries in the living mammal.
      ,
      • Naito Y
      • Shinoka T
      • Duncan D
      • et al.
      Vascular tissue engineering: Towards the next generation vascular grafts.
      ,
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • AM Stahl
      • Shanjani Y
      • Yang Y
      Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.
      ,
      • Lovett M
      • Lee K
      • Edwards A
      • Kaplan DL
      Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering.
      ,
      • Elomaa L
      • Yang YP.
      Additive manufacturing of vascular grafts and vascularized tissue constructs.
      ].
      Bone is a complex organ with an intricate design. The inner matrix, cancellous bone, is a porous network formed by trabeculae, red marrow, and vasculature that acts as the site of hematopoiesis while providing strength, flexibility, and decreasing the weight of bone. The outer matrix, cortical bone, is a dense region with vascular canals that is capable of withstanding a high mechanical load and resisting bending and torsion forces. The outermost layer of bone, the periosteum, is a thin vascular membrane that houses osteoblasts and progenitor cells and is capable of forming new bone. The extracellular matrix provides a scaffold for bone deposition, strengthens the construct, and houses signaling factors that are crucial to bone formation, growth, remodeling, and resorption [
      • Bi Y
      • Stuelten CH
      • Kilts T
      • et al.
      Extracellular matrix proteoglycans control the fate of bone marrow stromal cells.
      ].
      Together, these form the three components necessary for tissue regeneration: an osteoconductive scaffold for cell adhesion, osteoinductive signaling molecules to guide bone formation, and osteogenic cells themselves. It is important to note that at the cellular level, efficient exchange of nutrients and waste is possible because cells and vessels are at most 100 to 300 microns apart [
      • Carmeliet P
      • Jain RK.
      Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases.
      ,
      • Jain RK
      • Au P
      • Tam J
      • Duda DG
      • Fukumura D
      Engineering vascularized tissue.
      ,
      • Rouwkema J
      • Rivron NC
      • Van Blitterswijk C
      Vascularization in tissue engineering.
      ].
      Bone tissue engineering strives to replicate the osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties of bone [
      • Bauer TW
      • Muschler GF
      Bone graft materials: an overview of the basic science.
      ]. Despite advancements in manufacturing synthetic bone and soft tissue composites, their clinical integration remains low.
      We believe that the barrier to clinical application of bone tissue engineering (BTE) constructs is the lack of concomitant vascularization techniques for these grafts [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • AM Stahl
      • Shanjani Y
      • Yang Y
      Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.
      ]. At present, BTE efforts are not integrated with vascular tissue engineering innovations. As such, state of the art vascular substitutes are not designed for bone applications and vice versa [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • AM Stahl
      • Shanjani Y
      • Yang Y
      Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.
      ]. It remains to be seen whether microvascular surgical techniques can aid in the revascularization of engineered bone substitutes. To date, this “Holy Grail” of bone tissue engineered constructs for treatment of critical sized bony defects has not been a reasonable alternative.

      Current techniques of segmental long bone defect filling

      The gold standard for bone repair remains autografting, or the transposition of a patient's bone from a distant region of the body to the site of the bony defect. This graft possesses all three components necessary for tissue regeneration: an osteoconductive scaffold, osteoinductive signaling molecules, and osteogenic cells [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • AM Stahl
      • Shanjani Y
      • Yang Y
      Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.
      ,
      • Zimmermann G
      • Moghaddam A
      Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.
      ,
      • Roddy E
      • DeBaun MR
      • Daoud-Gray A
      • Yang YP
      • Gardner MJ
      Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives.
      ]. Unfortunately, autograft is limited in supply and bone harvest is linked to pain and morbidity at the donor site.
      Allografts are another option. These are comprised of decellularized bone that has been harvested from non-self, human donors. Allografts lack osteogenic cells and functioning inductive proteins; however, they possess osteoconductive properties as their extracellular matrix provides a scaffold for growth. Some surgeons have augmented allograft bone with autograft bone marrow aspirate concentrates to restore osteoinductivity to these scaffolds. This technique has shown promise. Both autograft and allograft also lack rapid vascularization into the body of the grafted material. Complications of allograft use include fracture, non-union, infection, and immunogenic response.
      Synthetic bone graft substitutes such as hydroxyapatite, calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, and tricalcium phosphate derivatives are osteoconductive [
      • Moore WR
      • Graves SE
      • Bain GI
      Synthetic bone graft substitutes.
      ,
      • Chow LC
      Calcium phosphate cements.
      ]. There is an unlimited supply of synthetic graft. These materials also have a long shelf life and do not carry a risk of disease transfer; however, they lack osteoinductive and osteogenic properties and to some extent can lack cortical stability [
      • Zimmermann G
      • Moghaddam A
      Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.
      ]. Outcomes of graft utilization for autograft, allograft, and synthetic bone substitutes are unpredictable, particularly when bone defect size is greater than 4 cm [
      • Masquelet AC
      • Begue T.
      The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects.
      ].
      Several clinical approaches have been implemented for segmental long bone defect filling including distraction osteogenesis, induced membranes, and vascularized fibular graft. Distraction osteogenesis takes advantage of the inherent ability of bone to regenerate under tension [
      • Aronson J.
      Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method.
      ]. In this technique, a corticotomy is created in a healthy region of bone at a site distant from the defect on the same bone [
      • Aronson J.
      Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method.
      ]. An external fixator is applied with tensioned wires that allow for gradual distraction using the principles of Ilizarov, to promote bone formation utilizing the technique he described as “Bone Transport” [
      • Aronson J.
      Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method.
      ,
      • Ilizarov G.
      Pseudarthroses and defects in long tubular bones.
      ]. Eventually, distraction across the corticotomy leads to new bone formation that replaces the critical size defect. When this transported bone meets with the segment of remaining bone at the “docking site,” grafting is performed. Compression is then applied across the site to gain bony union. Disadvantages include a lengthy duration of treatment, bulky apparatus surrounding the affected limb, pin site infection, and pain from surrounding structure stretching [
      • Aronson J.
      Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method.
      ,
      • Blum ALL
      • Bongiovanni JC
      • Morgan SJ
      • Flierl MA
      • Dos Reis FB
      Complications associated with distraction osteogenesis for infected nonunion of the femoral shaft in the presence of a bone defect: a retrospective series.
      ]. Some of these disadvantages can now be ameliorated with new design internal bone transport nails.
      Induced membrane technique involves a two-stage procedure wherein a temporary cement spacer is introduced into a bone defect and is later removed and replaced by autograft and possible allograft adjunct [
      • Masquelet AC
      • Fitoussi F
      • Begue T
      • Muller G
      Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft.
      ,
      • Piacentini F
      • Ceglia MJ
      • Bettini L
      • Bianco S
      • Buzzi R
      • Campanacci DA
      Induced membrane technique using enriched bone grafts for treatment of posttraumatic segmental long bone defects.
      ,
      • Taylor BC
      • French BG
      • Ty Fowler T
      • Russell J
      • Poka A
      Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss.
      ]. Over a period of weeks, the cement induces a foreign body reaction that leads to formation of a fibrous, vascular membrane around the spacer [
      • Masquelet AC
      • Begue T.
      The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects.
      ,
      • Masquelet AC
      • Fitoussi F
      • Begue T
      • Muller G
      Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft.
      ,
      • Piacentini F
      • Ceglia MJ
      • Bettini L
      • Bianco S
      • Buzzi R
      • Campanacci DA
      Induced membrane technique using enriched bone grafts for treatment of posttraumatic segmental long bone defects.
      ,
      • Taylor BC
      • French BG
      • Ty Fowler T
      • Russell J
      • Poka A
      Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss.
      . This vascularized environment provides nourishment for bone repair once autograft is added. An obvious downside to this technique is the need for a second operation. Additional complications include infection, malunion, fracture, and nonunion. Infection can be decreased by impregnating the cement spacer with antibiotics [
      • Masquelet AC
      • Begue T.
      The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects.
      ,
      • Masquelet AC
      • Fitoussi F
      • Begue T
      • Muller G
      Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft.
      ,
      • Piacentini F
      • Ceglia MJ
      • Bettini L
      • Bianco S
      • Buzzi R
      • Campanacci DA
      Induced membrane technique using enriched bone grafts for treatment of posttraumatic segmental long bone defects.
      ,
      • Taylor BC
      • French BG
      • Ty Fowler T
      • Russell J
      • Poka A
      Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss.
      ]. This technique provides less reliable results than that obtained by experienced surgeons in the methods of bone transport; most results reported on induced membrane technique often achieve at best an implant-dependent union.
      Vascularized fibular grafts can also be used to reconstruct skeletal defects [
      • Taylor GI
      • Miller GDH
      • Ham FJ
      The free vascularized bone graft.
      ,
      • Dormans JP
      • Krajbich JI
      • Zuker R
      • Demuynk M
      Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: treatment with free vascularized fibular grafts.
      ,
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ,
      • Sun Y
      • Zhang C
      • Jin D
      • et al.
      Free vascularised fibular grafting in the treatment of large skeletal defects due to osteomyelitis.
      ]. They are harvested with an attached arteriovenous pedicle and can be grafted with surrounding muscle, fascia, or skin to meet the needs of the recipient tissue [
      • Taylor GI
      • Miller GDH
      • Ham FJ
      The free vascularized bone graft.
      ,
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ]. The vascularized fibular graft can be approximately twenty centimeters in length [
      • Taylor GI
      • Miller GDH
      • Ham FJ
      The free vascularized bone graft.
      ,
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ]. It is indicated for treatment of large segmental bone defects (greater than five or six centimeters in length) or for areas with a poorly vascularized soft tissue envelope [
      • Dormans JP
      • Krajbich JI
      • Zuker R
      • Demuynk M
      Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: treatment with free vascularized fibular grafts.
      ]. Various osteotomies can be performed to the graft because of its dual vascular supply from both endosteal and periosteal vessels supplied by the peroneal artery and vein [
      • Taylor GI
      • Miller GDH
      • Ham FJ
      The free vascularized bone graft.
      ,
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ]. A transverse osteotomy allows creation of a “double barrel” construct to match the length and width of a defect, while a longitudinal osteotomy can be utilized to strengthen partial cortical defects [
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ,
      • Jones NF
      • Swartz WM
      • Mears DC
      • Jupiter JB
      • Grossman A
      The “double barrel” free vascularized fibular bone graft.
      ]. Microvascular anastomosis of graft vessels to the defect site prevents resorption and mechanical weakening of the graft [
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ]. This is unlike the creeping substitution experienced by avascular grafts wherein graft necrosis leads to resorption, and later, new bone formation [
      • Dormans JP
      • Krajbich JI
      • Zuker R
      • Demuynk M
      Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: treatment with free vascularized fibular grafts.
      ,
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ]. Graft vascularity enhances healing and promotes graft hypertrophy [
      • Sun Y
      • Zhang C
      • Jin D
      • et al.
      Free vascularised fibular grafting in the treatment of large skeletal defects due to osteomyelitis.
      ,
      • De Boer HH
      • Wood MB
      Bone changes in the vascularised fibular graft.
      ]. As with other autografts, graft availability is limited. Complications are more prominent at the recipient site as compared to the donor site and include infection, nonunion, graft fatigue fracture, and vascular compromise [
      • Malizos KN
      • Zalavras CG
      • Soucacos PN
      • Beris AE
      • Urbaniak JR
      Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
      ,
      • De Boer HH
      • Wood MB
      Bone changes in the vascularised fibular graft.
      ].
      Tissue engineering could provide a single-stage solution for surgical treatment of segmental long bone defects. The ideal engineered graft would be osteoconductive, osteoinductive, promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis, allow load transfer with weight-bearing activities, and be biocompatible with host tissue. Many promising constructs exist, but none meet all of the qualities outlined above. The list of materials and manufacturing methods that have been trialed in attempt to create a better engineered bone scaffold are quite extensive (Table 1).
      Table 1Manufacturing methods and materials that have been utilized in the construction of synthetic rigid porous scaffolds to replace bone voids.
      In synthesizing scaffolds, porosity and mechanical strength must be balanced [
      • Ritchie RO.
      The conflicts between strength and toughness.
      ]. Multiple techniques and materials have been applied to create scaffolds [
      • Kramschuster A
      • Turng LS.
      An injection molding process for manufacturing highly porous and interconnected biodegradable polymer matrices for use as tissue engineering scaffolds.
      ,
      • Dehghani F
      • Annabi N
      Engineering porous scaffolds using gas-based techniques.
      ,
      • Teixeira S
      • Fernandes H
      • Leusink A
      • et al.
      In vivo evaluation of highly macroporous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
      ,
      • Meng ZX
      • Li HF
      • Sun ZZ
      • Zheng W
      • Zheng YF
      Fabrication of mineralized electrospun PLGA and PLGA/gelatin nanofibers and their potential in bone tissue engineering.
      ,
      • Bonzani IC
      • Adhikari R
      • Houshyar S
      • Mayadunne R
      • Gunatillake P
      • Stevens MM
      Synthesis of two-component injectable polyurethanes for bone tissue engineering.
      ,
      • Liao J
      • Zhang L
      • Zuo Y
      • et al.
      Development of nanohydroxyapatite/polycarbonate composite for bone repair.
      ,
      • Poshusta AK
      • Burdick JA
      • Mortisen DJ
      • et al.
      Histocompatibility of photocrosslinked polyanhydrides: A novel in situ forming orthopaedic biomaterial.
      ,
      • Grayson WL
      • Fröhlich M
      • Yeager K
      • et al.
      Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts.
      ,
      • Lee JH
      • Kim JH
      • Oh SH
      • et al.
      Tissue-engineered bone formation using periosteal-derived cells and polydioxanone/pluronic F127 scaffold with pre-seeded adipose tissue-derived CD146 positive endothelial-like cells.
      ,
      • Kang Y
      • Scully A
      • Young DA
      • et al.
      Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications.
      ,
      • Macdonald ML
      • Samuel RE
      • Shah NJ
      • Padera RF
      • Beben YM
      • Hammond PT
      Tissue integration of growth factor-eluting layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte multilayer coated implants.
      ,
      • Stansbury JW
      • Idacavage MJ.
      3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities.
      ,
      • Shanjani Y
      • Hu Y
      • Toyserkani E
      • Grynpas M
      • Kandel RA
      • Pilliar RM
      Solid freeform fabrication of porous calcium polyphosphate structures for bone substitute applications: in vivo studies.
      ,
      • Dabrowski B
      • Swieszkowski W
      • Godlinski D
      • Kurzydlowski KJ
      Highly porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic applications.
      ,
      • Staiger MP
      • Pietak AM
      • Huadmai J
      • Dias G
      Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review.
      ]. Ceramics are commonly used. These include hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and tricalcium phosphate. They are biocompatible and osteoconductive with pores for cell ingrowth; however, they are also brittle [
      • Rezwan K
      • Chen QZ
      • Blaker JJ
      • Boccaccini AR
      Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
      ,
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • Y Kang
      • Ker DFE
      • et al.
      Synthesis and characterization of novel elastomeric poly(D,L-lactide urethane) maleate composites for bone tissue engineering.
      ]. Natural scaffolds such as hyaluronic acid, collagen, and alginate also provide pores for cell adherence and ingrowth, but lack the mechanical strength to be stand-alone scaffolds [
      • Jin HH
      • Kim DH
      • Kim TW
      • et al.
      In vivo evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite/chitosan-alginate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
      ]. As such, ceramics are often coated in synthetic biodegradable polymers [e.g. polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), or polylactic acid co-glycolic acid (PLGA)] to increase strength and osteoinductivity [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • Y Kang
      • Ker DFE
      • et al.
      Synthesis and characterization of novel elastomeric poly(D,L-lactide urethane) maleate composites for bone tissue engineering.
      ,
      • Roohani-Esfahani SI
      • Nouri-Khorasani S
      • Lu Z
      • Appleyard R
      • Zreiqat H
      The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites.
      ]. Similarly, natural scaffolds can be strengthened through combination with other compounds. Small signaling molecules such as bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), and vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) among others have been utilized to induce cell differentiation and vascular growth in scaffolds [
      • Kang Y
      • Kim S
      • Khademhosseini A
      • Yang Y
      Creation of bony microenvironment with CaP and cell-derived ECM to enhance human bone-marrow MSC behavior and delivery of BMP-2.
      ,
      • Kang SW
      • Kim JS
      • Park KS
      • et al.
      Surface modification with fibrin/hyaluronic acid hydrogel on solid-free form-based scaffolds followed by BMP-2 loading to enhance bone regeneration.
      ,
      • Qu D
      • Li J
      • Li Y
      • et al.
      Angiogenesis and osteogenesis enhanced by bFGF ex vivo gene therapy for bone tissue engineering in reconstruction of calvarial defects.
      ,
      • Yang P
      • Wang C
      • Shi Z
      • et al.
      Prefabrication of vascularized porous three-dimensional scaffold induced from rhVEGF165: a preliminary study in rats.
      ].
      While bone tissue engineering has provided promising results, it has become increasingly clear that efforts should be directed towards hierarchical integration of bone scaffolds and vascular networks to create constructs that support both osteogenic and angiogenic growth. Exchange of nutrients and waste between individual cells and capillaries within bone is limited to between 100-300 micrometers [
      • Carmeliet P
      • Jain RK.
      Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases.
      ,
      • Jain RK
      • Au P
      • Tam J
      • Duda DG
      • Fukumura D
      Engineering vascularized tissue.
      ,
      • Rouwkema J
      • Rivron NC
      • Van Blitterswijk C
      Vascularization in tissue engineering.
      ]. This poses a limitation to graft integration from the cellular level to macroscale incorporation into host tissue. Vascular networks within a bone tissue engineered construct must consist of large vessels as well as microvascular beds to provide gradient driven blood of sufficient volume across the entire scaffold. This is necessary for the rapid and complete integration of the scaffold into the host, as well as to allow for viability of any cell line added to the composite (Fig. 1).
      Fig. 1A
      Fig. 1ASegmental defect of bone with constructed synthetic graft matrix and synthetic vascular tree with inflow and outflow conduits to allow for immediate perfusion of the segmental structural graft. 1B: Following inset and microvascular anastomoses of arterial inflow (red) and venous outflow (blue) graft vascular tree. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
      Fig. 1A
      Fig. 1ASegmental defect of bone with constructed synthetic graft matrix and synthetic vascular tree with inflow and outflow conduits to allow for immediate perfusion of the segmental structural graft. 1B: Following inset and microvascular anastomoses of arterial inflow (red) and venous outflow (blue) graft vascular tree. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

      Bone tissue engineering: newer perspectives

      Tissue engineered vascular grafts

      Clinical integration of tissue engineered vascular grafts has been challenging, in part due to limited hemocompatibility causing thrombogenic occlusion and stenosis from intimal hyperplasia [
      • Naito Y
      • Shinoka T
      • Duncan D
      • et al.
      Vascular tissue engineering: Towards the next generation vascular grafts.
      ,
      • Lovett M
      • Lee K
      • Edwards A
      • Kaplan DL
      Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering.
      ,
      • Elomaa L
      • Yang YP.
      Additive manufacturing of vascular grafts and vascularized tissue constructs.
      ]. The ideal vessel graft should be biocompatible with similar biochemical, permeability, and compliance properties to host tissue. Most importantly, because these grafts must be of small diameter and require microsurgical techniques to integrate them to the host vascular tree, these foreign graft materials must allow for endothelialization either in vitro or rapidly after anastomosis is completed to prevent thrombosis of the graft matrix.

      Manufacturing

      Elastomers are polymers that possess viscoelasticity, allowing them to withstand more repetitive strain and cyclic stress compared to other materials [
      • Stahl AM
      • Yang YP.
      Tunable elastomers with an antithrombotic component for cardiovascular applications.
      ]. Elastomer grafts provide a surface for cell adhesion, cell integration, and proliferation within graft tissue, ultimately allowing substitution of graft with host vascular tissue. Several researchers have attempted to manufacture small synthetic hollow fibers that could serve as structural bridges for vascular conduits within a synthetic bone filling scaffold. Some have used elastomeric polyester urethane with varying success [
      • Wen X
      • Tresco PA.
      Fabrication and characterization of permeable degradable poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) hollow fiber phase inversion membranes for use as nerve tract guidance channels.
      ,
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • Y Kang
      • Findlay MW
      • Yang Y
      Development and evaluation of elastomeric hollow fiber membranes as small diameter vascular graft substitutes.
      ]. Ideally, these elastomeric vascular graft substitutes would possess vessel-like properties, good permeability, slow degradation with concurrent host repopulation, host cell compatibility, and low host inflammatory response [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • Y Kang
      • Findlay MW
      • Yang Y
      Development and evaluation of elastomeric hollow fiber membranes as small diameter vascular graft substitutes.
      ]. Although these grafts have been promising in large vessel applications, they have yet to demonstrate viability in microvascular applications. As no good in vivo data currently exists for these grafts, the integration of a vascular tree component to these bony scaffold models is limited.
      Several authors have tried to incorporate vascularized tissue into ceramic scaffolds by adding vascular growth factors or directly placing vascularized tissue beds into the ceramic composite [
      • Akita S
      • Tamai N
      • Myoui A
      • et al.
      Capillary vessel network integration by inserting a vascular pedicle enhances bone formation in tissue-engineered bone formation using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics.
      ,
      • Haholu A
      • Sever C
      • Uygur F
      • et al.
      Preefabrication of vascularized bone graft using an interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in presence of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: experimental study in rats.
      ]. To date, none have successfully incorporated a synthetic vessel into a structural component to achieve true immediate vascular reconstitution of the scaffold graft [
      • Akita S
      • Tamai N
      • Myoui A
      • et al.
      Capillary vessel network integration by inserting a vascular pedicle enhances bone formation in tissue-engineered bone formation using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics.
      ,
      • Haholu A
      • Sever C
      • Uygur F
      • et al.
      Preefabrication of vascularized bone graft using an interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in presence of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: experimental study in rats.
      ]. One of the authors has engineered a vascular graft substitute that is compatible with both human endothelial and mesenchymal stem cell lines, allowing for cell adhesion to and proliferation within the synthetic vascular graft [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • Y Kang
      • Findlay MW
      • Yang Y
      Development and evaluation of elastomeric hollow fiber membranes as small diameter vascular graft substitutes.
      ]. These grafts also had low platelet adhesion and low protein adsorption in vitro [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • DFE Ker
      • Yang Y
      Hemocompatibility evaluation of small elastomeric hollow fiber membranes as vascular substitutes.
      ]. Prolonged vascular patency in a host has not yet been shown.
      Chang et al. approached bioengineering for composite tissue re-creation in a unique way [
      • Chang E
      • Bonillas R
      • El-ftesi S
      • et al.
      Tissue engineering using autologous microcirculatory beds as vascularized bioscaffolds.
      ]. Using an animal model, they placed an autologous explanted microcirculatory bed (EMB) consisting of an afferent artery, capillary beds, efferent vein, and surrounding parenchymal tissue into a bioreactor and maintained tissue viability ex vivo for 24 hours [
      • Chang E
      • Bonillas R
      • El-ftesi S
      • et al.
      Tissue engineering using autologous microcirculatory beds as vascularized bioscaffolds.
      ]. Later, the EMBs were seeded with either multipotent adult progenitor cells, bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, or adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells [
      • Chang E
      • Bonillas R
      • El-ftesi S
      • et al.
      Tissue engineering using autologous microcirculatory beds as vascularized bioscaffolds.
      ]. They found that each of these cell lines could egress from the microcirculation into the parenchymal space and form proliferative clusters that maintained viability [
      • Chang E
      • Bonillas R
      • El-ftesi S
      • et al.
      Tissue engineering using autologous microcirculatory beds as vascularized bioscaffolds.
      ]. This may represent a more viable method to augment engineered scaffolds in the future.

      Rigid porous scaffolds

      The scaffold acts as an artificial extracellular matrix, a temporary structure that allows for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, ultimately with degradation of the graft and replacement with host cells. Ideally, the construct is biocompatible, strong, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive. Many scaffolds have been tried, but no clear evidence exists to suggest that one is particularly better than another [
      • Hutmacher DW
      Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.
      ,
      • Lichte P
      • Pape HC
      • Pufe T
      • Kobbe P
      • Fischer H
      Scaffolds for bone healing: Concepts, materials and evidence.
      ,
      • Stevens B
      • Yang Y
      • Mohandas A
      • Stucker B
      • Nguyen KT
      A review of materials, fabrication methods, and strategies used to enhance bone regeneration in engineered bone tissues.
      ].
      The literature suggests that composite tissue bone scaffolds likely provide the best alternative to synthetic rigid porous scaffolds. These integrated scaffolds have commonly been made with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HA), biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), and the synthetic biodegradable polymer polycaprolactone (PCL). PCL is simple to manufacture, easy to manipulate, and mixes well with other materials such as polymers and ceramics [
      • Huang B
      • Caetano G
      • Vyas C
      • Blaker JJ
      • Diver C
      • Bártolo P
      Polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds: the effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri-calcium phosphate.
      ]. β-TCP possesses biomimetic potential; it is a calcium phosphate derivative, similar to natural bone.
      Roohani-Esfahani, et al. created a synthetic scaffold utilizing BCP coated with nanoparticle layers of PCL and HA [
      • Roohani-Esfahani SI
      • Nouri-Khorasani S
      • Lu Z
      • Appleyard R
      • Zreiqat H
      The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites.
      ]. Their composite scaffold had a higher compressive strength than other HA/β-TCP scaffolds (2.1 MPa versus 0.1-0.3 MPa) as well as enhanced elasticity, similar to the stress-strain characteristics of normal bone [
      • Roohani-Esfahani SI
      • Nouri-Khorasani S
      • Lu Z
      • Appleyard R
      • Zreiqat H
      The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites.
      ]. These highly porous scaffolds supported osteoblast integration and differentiation in vitro with increased alkaline phosphatase activity and increased osteogenic gene expression. The coating greatly improved the bioactivity and mechanical properties of this scaffold, reducing the general brittleness compared to most ceramics.
      Bruyas, et al. printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds in an attempt to mimic a new bone matrix. By varying scaffold porosity and ceramic content, they too found that composition has an effect on surface properties, rate of degradation, and mechanical strength which further affects osteoconduction, proliferation, and differentiation [
      • Bruyas A
      • Lou F
      • Stahl AM
      • et al.
      Systematic characterization of 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds for biomedical devices and bone tissue engineering: influence of composition and porosity.
      ]. Further, a PCL/β-TCP composite with higher ceramic content possessed a rougher surface, accelerated rate of degradation, and lower elasticity as compared to a composite with lower ceramic content [
      • Bruyas A
      • Lou F
      • Stahl AM
      • et al.
      Systematic characterization of 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds for biomedical devices and bone tissue engineering: influence of composition and porosity.
      ]. Scaffold composition did not change cell attachment [
      • Bruyas A
      • Lou F
      • Stahl AM
      • et al.
      Systematic characterization of 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds for biomedical devices and bone tissue engineering: influence of composition and porosity.
      ]. In a highly porous construct, the material composition had little influence on its apparent Young's modulus [
      • Bruyas A
      • Lou F
      • Stahl AM
      • et al.
      Systematic characterization of 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds for biomedical devices and bone tissue engineering: influence of composition and porosity.
      ]. Kang, et al. also found that the physical properties of a simple crystalline structure, in their case β-TCP, could be advantageously modified with the addition of another biocompatible polymer [
      • Kang Y
      • Scully A
      • Young DA
      • et al.
      Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications.
      ]. They infiltrated an interconnected porous β-TCP scaffold with a thin layer of polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) [
      • Kang Y
      • Scully A
      • Young DA
      • et al.
      Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications.
      ]. This composite was less brittle and had increased compressive strength, bending strength, and toughness as compared to the porous β-TCP alone, while still maintaining the interconnected porous microstructure [
      • Kang Y
      • Scully A
      • Young DA
      • et al.
      Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications.
      ]. These results can provide guidance in customizing the biological properties of rigid porous scaffolds for the future.

      Combining of vascular and bone engineered entities into a composite

      Again, it seems that the reason for the limited clinical success of synthetic bone scaffold substitutes has been the lack of vascular tree integration into the scaffold design [
      • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
      • AM Stahl
      • Shanjani Y
      • Yang Y
      Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.
      ]. This integration is necessary to provide immediate nutrition and waste disposal for any cell line acutely added to the matrix. Additionally, vascular networks within the scaffold and anastomoses between scaffold and host are essential for graft integration as a viable composite tissue. Unfortunately, microsurgical integration of tissue engineered vascular grafts has been limited by the inability to maintain flow and vascular patency within these grafts. This challenge is magnified by the length of microvascular synthetic conduit needed to perfuse a rigid porous scaffold and difficulty maintaining microvascular patency on the distal, low-pressure venous end. Until these can be overcome, the “Holy Grail” remains unattainable (Fig. 1).
      Grayson, et al. described a technique of bioreactor generated bone of specific size and shape grown with an interstitial flow of culture medium seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells [
      • Grayson WL
      • Fröhlich M
      • Yeager K
      • et al.
      Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts.
      ]. This is a promising technique for bone generation; however, they remain stunted by a lack of ability to maintain nutrient perfusion to the graft after removal from the bioreactor and placement into the host.

      Conclusion and future directions

      Segmental long bone defects remain one of the most challenging orthopaedic conditions to treat. These have classically been treated with bone grafting techniques, and more recently with clinical techniques such as distraction osteogenesis and induced membranes. Each technique has its limitations, ranging from donor site morbidity to infection and long duration of treatment. Bone tissue engineering remains an exciting prospect for the treatment of these defects. Traditional bone tissue engineering has focused on designing a scaffold that is osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic; however, current efforts have not been integrated with cutting edge innovations in vascular tissue engineering. The translational future of vascularized bone tissue engineering scaffolds will be determined by our ability to integrate these two designs into one.
      In the end, composite rigid scaffolds will not make or break the success of synthetic bone graft substitutes. Instead, this will depend on our ability to create an acute living tissue bed in the critical size bone defect to allow differentiation into vascularized bone. It is quite possible that the skillfully engineered rigid composite scaffolds may not even play a role in the final solution for this ongoing dilemma.

      Declaration of Competing Interest

      We wish to draw the attention of the Editor to the following facts which may be considered as potential conflicts of interest and to significant financial contributors to this work. All authors have no conflict of interest in regard to this work.

      Appendix. Supplementary materials

      References

        • Clark ER
        • Clark EL
        Microscopic observations on the growth of blood capillaries in the living mammal.
        Am J Anat. 1939; 64: 251
        • Naito Y
        • Shinoka T
        • Duncan D
        • et al.
        Vascular tissue engineering: Towards the next generation vascular grafts.
        Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011; 63: 312-323https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.001
        • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
        • AM Stahl
        • Shanjani Y
        • Yang Y
        Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 43: 718-729https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1253-3
        • Lovett M
        • Lee K
        • Edwards A
        • Kaplan DL
        Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering.
        Tissue Eng - Part B Rev. 2009; 15: 353-370https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23919
        • Elomaa L
        • Yang YP.
        Additive manufacturing of vascular grafts and vascularized tissue constructs.
        Tissue Eng - Part B Rev. 2017; 23: 436-450https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0348
        • Bi Y
        • Stuelten CH
        • Kilts T
        • et al.
        Extracellular matrix proteoglycans control the fate of bone marrow stromal cells.
        J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 30481-30489https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M500573200
        • Carmeliet P
        • Jain RK.
        Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases.
        Nature. 2000; 407: 249-257
        • Jain RK
        • Au P
        • Tam J
        • Duda DG
        • Fukumura D
        Engineering vascularized tissue.
        Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23
        • Rouwkema J
        • Rivron NC
        • Van Blitterswijk C
        Vascularization in tissue engineering.
        Trends Biotechnol. 2008; 26: 434
        • Bauer TW
        • Muschler GF
        Bone graft materials: an overview of the basic science.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 371: 10-27https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003
        • Zimmermann G
        • Moghaddam A
        Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.
        Injury. 2011; 42: S16-S21https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.199
        • Roddy E
        • DeBaun MR
        • Daoud-Gray A
        • Yang YP
        • Gardner MJ
        Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28: 351-362https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0
        • Moore WR
        • Graves SE
        • Bain GI
        Synthetic bone graft substitutes.
        ANZ J Surg. 2001; 71: 354-361https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x
        • Chow LC
        Calcium phosphate cements.
        Second Ed. An Introduction to Bioceramics. 18. 2013: 409-430https://doi.org/10.1142/9781908977168_0028
        • Masquelet AC
        • Begue T.
        The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2010; 41: 27-37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011
        • Aronson J.
        Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method.
        J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1997; 79: 1243-1258https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199708000-00019
        • Ilizarov G.
        Pseudarthroses and defects in long tubular bones.
        Transosseous Osteosynthesis. Springer, 1992: 453-494
        • Blum ALL
        • Bongiovanni JC
        • Morgan SJ
        • Flierl MA
        • Dos Reis FB
        Complications associated with distraction osteogenesis for infected nonunion of the femoral shaft in the presence of a bone defect: a retrospective series.
        J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2010; 92: 565-570https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.23475
        • Masquelet AC
        • Fitoussi F
        • Begue T
        • Muller G
        Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft.
        Ann Chir Plast Esth. 2000; 45: 346-353
        • Piacentini F
        • Ceglia MJ
        • Bettini L
        • Bianco S
        • Buzzi R
        • Campanacci DA
        Induced membrane technique using enriched bone grafts for treatment of posttraumatic segmental long bone defects.
        J Orthop Traumatol. 2019; 20https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-019-0522-6
        • Taylor BC
        • French BG
        • Ty Fowler T
        • Russell J
        • Poka A
        Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20: 142-150https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-03-142
        • Taylor GI
        • Miller GDH
        • Ham FJ
        The free vascularized bone graft.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 55: 533-544
        • Dormans JP
        • Krajbich JI
        • Zuker R
        • Demuynk M
        Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: treatment with free vascularized fibular grafts.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 1990; 10: 623-628
        • Malizos KN
        • Zalavras CG
        • Soucacos PN
        • Beris AE
        • Urbaniak JR
        Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12: 360-369
        • Sun Y
        • Zhang C
        • Jin D
        • et al.
        Free vascularised fibular grafting in the treatment of large skeletal defects due to osteomyelitis.
        Int Orthop. 2010; 34: 425-430https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0761-x
        • Jones NF
        • Swartz WM
        • Mears DC
        • Jupiter JB
        • Grossman A
        The “double barrel” free vascularized fibular bone graft.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988; 81: 378-385
        • De Boer HH
        • Wood MB
        Bone changes in the vascularised fibular graft.
        J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 1989; 71: 374-378https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.71b3.2722923
        • Ritchie RO.
        The conflicts between strength and toughness.
        Nat Mater. 2011; 10: 817-822https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3115
        • Kramschuster A
        • Turng LS.
        An injection molding process for manufacturing highly porous and interconnected biodegradable polymer matrices for use as tissue engineering scaffolds.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2010; 92: 366-376https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31523
        • Dehghani F
        • Annabi N
        Engineering porous scaffolds using gas-based techniques.
        Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011; 22: 661-666https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.005
        • Teixeira S
        • Fernandes H
        • Leusink A
        • et al.
        In vivo evaluation of highly macroporous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2010; 93: 567-575https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32532
        • Meng ZX
        • Li HF
        • Sun ZZ
        • Zheng W
        • Zheng YF
        Fabrication of mineralized electrospun PLGA and PLGA/gelatin nanofibers and their potential in bone tissue engineering.
        Mater Sci Eng C. 2013; 33: 699-706https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.10.021
        • Bonzani IC
        • Adhikari R
        • Houshyar S
        • Mayadunne R
        • Gunatillake P
        • Stevens MM
        Synthesis of two-component injectable polyurethanes for bone tissue engineering.
        Biomaterials. 2007; 28: 423-433https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.026
        • Liao J
        • Zhang L
        • Zuo Y
        • et al.
        Development of nanohydroxyapatite/polycarbonate composite for bone repair.
        J Biomater Appl. 2009; 24: 31-45https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328209102756
        • Poshusta AK
        • Burdick JA
        • Mortisen DJ
        • et al.
        Histocompatibility of photocrosslinked polyanhydrides: A novel in situ forming orthopaedic biomaterial.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2003; 64: 62-69https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10274
        • Grayson WL
        • Fröhlich M
        • Yeager K
        • et al.
        Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 3299-3304
        • Lee JH
        • Kim JH
        • Oh SH
        • et al.
        Tissue-engineered bone formation using periosteal-derived cells and polydioxanone/pluronic F127 scaffold with pre-seeded adipose tissue-derived CD146 positive endothelial-like cells.
        Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 5033-5045https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.081
        • Kang Y
        • Scully A
        • Young DA
        • et al.
        Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications.
        Eur Polym J. 2011; 47: 1569-1577https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.05.004
        • Macdonald ML
        • Samuel RE
        • Shah NJ
        • Padera RF
        • Beben YM
        • Hammond PT
        Tissue integration of growth factor-eluting layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte multilayer coated implants.
        Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 1446-1453https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.052
        • Stansbury JW
        • Idacavage MJ.
        3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities.
        Dent Mater. 2016; 32: 54-64https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
        • Shanjani Y
        • Hu Y
        • Toyserkani E
        • Grynpas M
        • Kandel RA
        • Pilliar RM
        Solid freeform fabrication of porous calcium polyphosphate structures for bone substitute applications: in vivo studies.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2013; (101 B): 972-980https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32905
        • Dabrowski B
        • Swieszkowski W
        • Godlinski D
        • Kurzydlowski KJ
        Highly porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic applications.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2010; 95: 53-61https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31682
        • Staiger MP
        • Pietak AM
        • Huadmai J
        • Dias G
        Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review.
        Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 1728-1734https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003
        • Rezwan K
        • Chen QZ
        • Blaker JJ
        • Boccaccini AR
        Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
        Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 3413-3431https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039
        • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
        • Y Kang
        • Ker DFE
        • et al.
        Synthesis and characterization of novel elastomeric poly(D,L-lactide urethane) maleate composites for bone tissue engineering.
        Eur Polym J. 2013; 49: 3337-3349https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.07.004
        • Jin HH
        • Kim DH
        • Kim TW
        • et al.
        In vivo evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite/chitosan-alginate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
        Int J Biol Macromol. 2012; 51: 1079-1085https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.08.027
        • Roohani-Esfahani SI
        • Nouri-Khorasani S
        • Lu Z
        • Appleyard R
        • Zreiqat H
        The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites.
        Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 5498-5509https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.058
        • Kang Y
        • Kim S
        • Khademhosseini A
        • Yang Y
        Creation of bony microenvironment with CaP and cell-derived ECM to enhance human bone-marrow MSC behavior and delivery of BMP-2.
        Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 6119-6130https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.015
        • Kang SW
        • Kim JS
        • Park KS
        • et al.
        Surface modification with fibrin/hyaluronic acid hydrogel on solid-free form-based scaffolds followed by BMP-2 loading to enhance bone regeneration.
        Bone. 2011; 48: 298-306https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.09.029
        • Qu D
        • Li J
        • Li Y
        • et al.
        Angiogenesis and osteogenesis enhanced by bFGF ex vivo gene therapy for bone tissue engineering in reconstruction of calvarial defects.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2011; 96 (A): 543-551https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33009
        • Yang P
        • Wang C
        • Shi Z
        • et al.
        Prefabrication of vascularized porous three-dimensional scaffold induced from rhVEGF165: a preliminary study in rats.
        Cells Tissues Organs. 2009; 189: 327-337https://doi.org/10.1159/000142162
        • Stahl AM
        • Yang YP.
        Tunable elastomers with an antithrombotic component for cardiovascular applications.
        Adv Healthc Mater. 2018; 7: 1-10https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800222
        • Wen X
        • Tresco PA.
        Fabrication and characterization of permeable degradable poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) hollow fiber phase inversion membranes for use as nerve tract guidance channels.
        Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 3800-3809https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.036
        • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
        • Y Kang
        • Findlay MW
        • Yang Y
        Development and evaluation of elastomeric hollow fiber membranes as small diameter vascular graft substitutes.
        Mater Sci Eng C. 2015; 49: 541-548https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.051
        • Akita S
        • Tamai N
        • Myoui A
        • et al.
        Capillary vessel network integration by inserting a vascular pedicle enhances bone formation in tissue-engineered bone formation using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics.
        Tissue Eng. 2004; 10: 789-795
        • Haholu A
        • Sever C
        • Uygur F
        • et al.
        Preefabrication of vascularized bone graft using an interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in presence of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: experimental study in rats.
        Indian J Plast Surg. 2012; 45: 444-452
        • ÁE Mercado-Pagán
        • DFE Ker
        • Yang Y
        Hemocompatibility evaluation of small elastomeric hollow fiber membranes as vascular substitutes.
        J Biomater Appl. 2014; 29: 557-565https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328214537541
        • Chang E
        • Bonillas R
        • El-ftesi S
        • et al.
        Tissue engineering using autologous microcirculatory beds as vascularized bioscaffolds.
        FASEB J. 2009; 3: 906-915
        • Hutmacher DW
        Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.
        Biomater Silver Jubil Compend. 2000; 21: 175-189https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045154-1.50021-6
        • Lichte P
        • Pape HC
        • Pufe T
        • Kobbe P
        • Fischer H
        Scaffolds for bone healing: Concepts, materials and evidence.
        Injury. 2011; 42: 569-573https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.033
        • Stevens B
        • Yang Y
        • Mohandas A
        • Stucker B
        • Nguyen KT
        A review of materials, fabrication methods, and strategies used to enhance bone regeneration in engineered bone tissues.
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2008; 85: 573-582https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30962
        • Huang B
        • Caetano G
        • Vyas C
        • Blaker JJ
        • Diver C
        • Bártolo P
        Polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds: the effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri-calcium phosphate.
        Materials (Basel). 2018; 11https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010129
        • Bruyas A
        • Lou F
        • Stahl AM
        • et al.
        Systematic characterization of 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds for biomedical devices and bone tissue engineering: influence of composition and porosity.
        J Mater Res. 2018; 33: 1948-1959https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.112