Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 50, SUPPLEMENT 5, S3-S7, December 2019

Why, when and how propeller perforator flaps in reconstructive surgery

  • Alexandru Valentin Georgescu
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Hospital of Recovery, Cluj Napoca, Romania
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ileana Rodica Matei
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Matei Ileana Rodica, Spitalul Clinic de Recuperare, Str. Viilor 46-50, 400347 Cluj Napoca, Cluj, Romania.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Hospital of Recovery, Cluj Napoca, Romania
    Search for articles by this author
  • Marko Bumbasirevic
    Affiliations
    Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia

    School of Medicine. University of Belgrade, Serbia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Panayotis N. Soucacos
    Affiliations
    “Panayotis N. Soucacos” Orthopaedic Research & Education Center (OREC), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 21, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.037

      Purpose

      The aim of this paper was to evaluate the outcomes of propeller perforator flaps used all over the body, and to appreciate their advantages and/or disadvantages over the free perforator flaps.

      Method

      Patients that required propeller perforator flaps used all over the body were eligible to participate in this study. A preoperative Doppler examination was performed for all the flaps in the trunk and thigh, but not regularly in the face, lower leg, foot, forearm and hand. We evaluated the most important technical aspects of harvesting the flaps, the main indications and advantages of using propeller perforator flaps, their disadvantages and complications.
      For post-excisional face and trunk defects after cancer or decubitus ulcers were performed approximately 25% of flaps.

      Results

      We had very good results in approximately 70% of cases. In the remaining cases, excepting 3 cases in which the flaps were completely lost, we registered only minor complications due to venous congestion, which were solved spontaneously or by skin grafting.

      Conclusion

      The main advantages of propeller perforator flaps, i.e. no need of microvascular anastomoses, replacing like-with-like, faster functional rehabilitation, can reduce in well selected cases the indication for free flaps. The rate of complications is not higher than by using other methods. The single real disadvantage of propeller perforator flaps is the location of the perforator close to the defect, what can be an impediment in trauma cases.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kroll S.S.
        • Rosenfield L.
        Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988; 81: 561-566
        • Koshima I.
        • Soeda S.
        Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1989; 42: 645-648
        • Georgescu AV
        • Matei I
        • Ardelean F
        • et al.
        Microsurgical nonmicrovascular flaps in forearm and hand reconstruction.
        Microsurgery. 2007; 27: 384-394
        • Georgescu AV
        Propeller perforator flaps in distal lower leg: evolution and clinical applications.
        Arch Plast Surg. 2012; 39: 94-105
        • Quaba O.
        • Quaba A.A.
        Pedicled perforator flaps for the lower limb.
        Semin Plast Surg. 2006; 20: 103-111
        • Schaverien M.
        • Saint-Cyr M.
        Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 161-170
        • Lecours C.
        • Saint-Cyr M.
        • Wong C.
        • et al.
        Freestyle pedicle perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1589-1603
        • El-Sabbagh A.H.
        Skin perforator flaps: an algorithm for leg reconstruction.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011; 27: 511-523
        • Lee B.T.
        • Lin S.J.
        • Bar-Meir E.D.
        • et al.
        Pedicled perforator flaps: a new principle in reconstructive surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 201-208
        • Wei F.C.
        • Celik N.
        Perforator flap entity.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2003; 30: 325-329
        • Koshima I.
        • Itoh S.
        • Nanba Y.
        • Tsutsui T.
        • Takahashi Y.
        Medial and lateral malleolar perforator flaps for repair of defects around the ankle.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 51: 579-583
        • Georgescu A.V.
        • Matei I.R.
        • Llusa M.
        Plantar flaps based on perforators of the plantar metatarsal/common digital arteries.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014; 30: 469-474
        • Matei I
        • Georgescu AV
        • Chiroiu B
        • et al.
        Harvesting of forearm perforator flaps based on intraoperative vascular exploration: clinical experiences and literature.
        Microsurgery. 2008; 28: 321-330
        • Saint-Cyr M
        • Mujadzic M
        • Wong C
        • et al.
        The radial artery pedicle perforator flap: vascular analysis and clinical implications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 1469-1478
        • Manchot C.
        The cutaneous arteries of the human body.
        Springer-Verlag, New York1983
        • Salmon M.
        Arteries of the skin.
        in: Taylor G.I. Tempest M. Churchill Livingstone, London1988
        • Taylor GI
        • Palmer JH
        The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1987; 40: 113-141
        • Saint-Cyr M
        • Wong C
        • Schaverien M
        • et al.
        Perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1529-1544
        • Lecours C
        • Saint-Cyr M
        • Wong C
        • et al.
        Freestyle pedicle perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1589-1603
        • Lee BT
        • Lin SJ
        • Bar-Meir ED
        • et al.
        Pedicled perforator flaps: a new principle in reconstructive surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 201-208
        • Chang Y.T.
        • Wang X.F.
        • Zhou Z.F.
        • et al.
        The reversed forearm fasciocutaneous flap in hand reconstruction: 10 successful cases.
        Chin J Plast Surg Burns. 1988; 4: 41-49
        • Hyakusoku H.
        • Yamamoto T.
        • Fumiiri M.
        The propeller flap method.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1991; 44: 53-54
        • Hallock G.G.
        The propeller flap version of the adductor muscle perforator flap for coverage of ischial or trochanteric pressure sores.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 56: 540-542
        • Pignatti M.
        • Ogawa R.
        • Hallock G.G.
        • et al.
        The “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 716-722
        • McCraw J.B.
        • Myers B.
        • Shanklin K.D.
        The value of fluorescein in predicting the viability of arterialized flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 60: 710-719
        • Morykwas M.J.
        • Hills H.
        • Argenta L.C.
        The safety of intravenous fluorescein administration.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1991; 26: 551-553
        • Eren S.
        • Rubben A.
        • Krein R.
        • et al.
        Assessment of microcirculation of an axial skin flap using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96: 1636-1649
        • Holm C.
        • Mayr M.
        • Hofter E.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative evaluation of skin-flap viability using laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55: 635-644
        • Matsui A.
        • Lee B.T.
        • Winer J.H.
        • et al.
        Real-time intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence angiography for perforator identification and flap design.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 125e-127e