Advertisement

Utility of early active motion for flexor tendon repair with concomitant injuries: A multivariate analysis

Published:October 22, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.022

      Highlights

      • Flexor tendon injury with concomitant fractures or extensor tendon injuries can aggravate postoperative functional outcome.
      • It is crucial to identify the factors affecting the outcome of flexor tendon repair.
      • Better postoperative functional outcome can be achieved through early active motion protocol.
      • Rigid osteosynthesis with a strong suture technique that can tolerate early active motion is vital.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Flexor tendon injury often occurs with concomitant injuries such as fracture, vascular injury, and extensor tendon injury. These injuries are repaired independently, without a comprehensive strategy. We aimed to identify the effect of concomitant injuries and treatment choice on the outcome of flexor tendon repair.

      Patients and methods

      We evaluated 118 fingers of 102 adult patients with zone 1–3 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injuries who underwent primary surgery at our hospital between April 2009 and December 2017. The 2-strand pull-out, 4-strand Tsuge, 6-strand Lim & Tsai, and 8-strand cross-locked cruciate suturing techniques were used. We performed multivariate analyses, with the active range of motion (AROM) of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints as dependent variables, and age, existence of concomitant injuries, and their treatment as independent variables.

      Results

      The average AROM of the PIP + DIP joints was 130° at the last follow-up, and ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ function was obtained in 74 (63%) of 118 fingers by using the Strickland criteria. Old age, concomitant diaphyseal fractures, and specific methods of osteosynthesis, such as pinning, flexor digitorum superficialis injury, and immobilisation for 3 weeks, significantly worsened the results. However, wiring for osteosynthesis and early active motion protocol improved postoperative functional outcome. Although the outcome did not differ among the suture techniques, the 4-strand Tsuge procedure was performed for the two surgically confirmed ruptures of repair that occurred in our series.

      Discussion

      We clarified the superiority of early mobilisation protocols with rigid osteosynthesis procedure, other than pinning. To minimise tendon adhesion or joint stiffness, surgeons should repair the tendon and fractured bone appropriately, to ensure early mobilisation without serious complications.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • James J.I.
        Fractures of the proximal and middle phalanges of the fingers.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1962; 32: 401-412
        • Huffaker W.H.
        • Wray Jr, R.C.
        • Weeks P.M.
        Factors influencing final range of motion in the fingers after fractures of the hand.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 63: 82-87
        • Chow S.P.
        • Pun W.K.
        • So Y.C.
        • Luk K.D.K.
        • Chid K.Y.
        • Ng K.H.
        • et al.
        A prospective study of 245 open digital fractures of the hand.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1991; 16: 137-140
        • Duncan R.W.
        • Freeland A.E.
        • Jabaley M.E.
        • Meydrech E.F.
        Open hand fractures: an analysis of the recovery of active motion and of complications.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1993; 18: 387-394
        • Ip W.Y.
        • Ng K.H.
        • Chow S.P.
        A prospective study of 924 digital fractures of the hand.
        Injury. 1996; 27: 279-285
        • Mayer L.
        The physiological method of tendon transplants reviewed after forty years.
        Instr Course Lect. 1956; 13: 116-120
        • Baktir A.
        • Turk C.Y.
        • Kabak S.
        • Sahin V.
        • Kardas Y.
        Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by early active mobilization.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1996; 21: 624-628
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Tolhurst P.
        • Lang D.
        • Page R.E.
        Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilisation.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1989; 14: 392-395
        • Elliot D.
        • Moiemen N.S.
        • Flemming A.F.
        • Harris S.B.
        • Foster A.J.
        The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1994; 19: 607-612
        • Moriya K.
        • Yoshizu T.
        • Maki Y.
        • Tsubokawa N.
        • Narisawa H.
        • Endo N.
        Clinical outcomes of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair using the six-strand technique: short- and long-term evaluations.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015; 40: 250-258
        • Tang J.B.
        Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair.
        Hand Clin. 2005; 21: 199-210
        • Tang J.B.
        Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon repair.
        Hand Clin. 2013; 29: 251-259
        • Rigo I.Z.
        • Rokkum M.
        Predictors of outcome after primary flexor tendon repair in zone 1, 2 and 3.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016; 41: 793-801
        • Tang J.B.
        Flexor tendon repair in zone 2C.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1994; 19: 72-75
        • Day C.S.
        Fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges.
        in: Wolfe S.W. Hotchkiss R.N. Pederson W.C. Kozin S.H. Cohen M.S. Green’s operative hand surgery. 7th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA2017: 231-277
        • Chow S.P.
        • Pun W.K.
        • So Y.C.
        • Luk K.D.
        • Chiu K.Y.
        • Ng K.H.
        • et al.
        A prospective study of 245 open digital fractures of the hand.
        J Hand Surg Br. 1991; 16: 137-140
        • Hastings 2nd, H.
        Unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fracture treatment with screws and plates.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; : 37-52
        • Verdan C.E.
        Half a century of flexor-tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 472-491
        • Strickland J.W.
        • Glogovac S.V.
        Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1980; 5: 537-543
        • Starnes T.
        • Saunders R.J.
        • Means Jr., K.R.
        Clinical outcomes of zone II flexor tendon repair depending on mechanism of injury.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37: 2532-2540
        • Tang J.B.
        Re: levels of experience of surgeons in clinical studies.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009; 34: 137-138
        • Lee S.K.
        • Fajardo M.
        • Kardashian G.
        • Klein J.
        • Tsai P.
        • Christoforou D.
        Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 1604-1609
        • Chauhan A.
        • Palmer B.A.
        • Merrell G.A.
        Flexor tendon repairs: techniques, eponyms, and evidence.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 1846-1853
        • Gill R.S.
        • Lim B.H.
        • Shatford R.A.
        • Toth E.
        • Voor M.J.
        • Tsai T.M.
        A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1999; 24: 1315-1322
        • Watanabe K.
        • Ota H.
        • Sasaki H.
        Eight-strand cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair using double-stranded suture: a description of the surgical technique.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4: e1048
        • Kleinert H.E.
        • Kutz J.E.
        • Atasoy E.
        • Stormo A.
        Primary repair of flexor tendons.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1973; 4: 865-876
        • Lister G.D.
        • Kleinert H.E.
        • Kutz J.E.
        • Atasoy E.
        Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1977; 2: 441-451
        • Chow J.A.
        • Thomes L.J.
        • Dovelle S.
        • Milnor W.H.
        • Seyfer A.E.
        • Smith A.C.
        A combined regimen of controlled motion following flexor tendon repair in “no man’s land”.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 79: 447-455
        • Kanda Y.
        Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics.
        Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48: 452-458
        • Tang J.B.
        Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007; 32: 118-129
        • Chesney A.
        • Chauhan A.
        • Kattan A.
        • Farrokhyar F.
        • Thoma A.
        Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1583-1592
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Manske P.R.
        • Akeson W.H.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Lundborg G.
        • Amiel D.
        Flexor tendon repair.
        J Orthop Res. 1986; 4: 119-128
        • Winters S.C.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Chan S.S.
        • Grewal R.
        • Seiler 3rd, J.G.
        The effects of multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23: 97-104
        • Lin T.W.
        • Cardenas L.
        • Soslowsky L.J.
        Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair.
        J Biomech. 2004; 37: 865-877
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Brodt M.D.
        • Winters S.C.
        • Silva M.J.
        The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 975-982
        • Thurman R.T.
        • Trumble T.E.
        • Hanel D.P.
        • Tencer A.F.
        • Kiser P.K.
        Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23: 261-265
        • Dinopoulos H.T.
        • Boyer M.I.
        • Burns M.E.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Silva M.J.
        The resistance of a four- and eight-strand suture technique to gap formation during tensile testing: an experimental study of repaired canine flexor tendons after 10 days of in vivo healing.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2000; 25: 489-498
        • Strickland J.W.
        Flexor tendon injuries: I. Foundations of treatment.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995; 3: 44-54
        • Boyer M.I.
        Flexor tendon biology.
        Hand Clin. 2005; 21: 159-166