Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 49, ISSUE 8, P1451-1457, August 2018

Download started.

Ok

Outcome after surgical treatment of fragility ankle fractures in a certified orthogeriatric trauma center

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Orthogeriatric ankle fractures seem to play an essential role in terms of quality of life in the elderly. Knowledge of the outcome after orthogeriatric ankle fractures is sparse. The present study investigates the outcome after surgically treated ankle fractures at a certified orthogeriatric trauma center.

      Material & Methods

      A retrospective observational study was performed investigating the outcome of surgically treated ankle fractures in orthogeriatric patients between 2015-2017. Outcome parameters included but were not limited to the EQ-5D 3 L, Barthel Index, Karlsson Score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Housing situation and mobility were evaluated and potential associations to the fracture pattern and the related treatment strategy were investigated.

      Results

      In total, 58 patients were included (age 77.7 ± 6,2 years). The majority were AO-44 B2 fractures (72%). General outcome was related to the Parker score; a Parker Score of 9 prior surgery was independently associated with an improved outcome according to the EQ-5D 3 L and Barthel Index. Patients under 80 years of age also had better results.
      Place of residence did not significantly change after surgery. Neither different types of implants nor initial use of an external fixator (e.g. open fractures) did influence outcome. A wound healing impairment was found in 10% of our patients whereas the overall unplanned reoperation rate was 7%. Overall complication rate was 20%, one-year mortality was 10%.

      Conclusions

      Surgically treated ankle fractures in the elderly which are treated in a certified geriatric fracture center seem to have limited negative effect on their quality of life. We did not observe the otherwise often demonstrated high mortality rates, but still nearly half of the patients demonstrated perioperative complications, which emphasizes the need for optimal perioperative care at an orthogeriatric trauma center. Since there was a reasonable number of patients with wound healing issues this study supports the idea of a staged protocol using external fixation with secondary ORIF.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Anderson S.A.
        • Li X.
        • Franklin P.
        • et al.
        Ankle fractures in the elderly: initial and long-term outcomes.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29 ([published Online First: 2009/01/14]): 1184-1188https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2008.1184
        • Cummings S.R.
        • Melton L.J.
        Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.
        Lancet. 2002; 359 ([published Online First: 2002/06/07]): 1761-1767https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9
        • Abrahamsen B.
        • van Staa T.
        • Ariely R.
        • et al.
        Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review.
        Osteoporosis Int : J Established Result Cooperation Eur FoundOsteoporosis Nat Osteoporosis Found USA. 2009; 20 ([published Online First: 2009/05/08]): 1633-1650https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3
        • Liem I.S.
        • Kammerlander C.
        • Suhm N.
        • et al.
        Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures.
        Injury. 2013; 44: 1403-1412https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.018
        • Greiner W.
        • Weijnen T.
        • Nieuwenhuizen M.
        • et al.
        A single European currency for EQ-5D health States: results from a six-Country study.
        Eur J Health Econ. 2003; 4: 222-231
        • Hinz A.
        • Klaiberg A.
        • Brahler E.
        • et al.
        [The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D: modelling and norm values for the general population].
        Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006; 56 ([published Online First: 2006/02/03]): 42-48https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-867061
        • Mahoney F.I.
        • Barthel D.W.
        Functional evaluation: the Bar Thel index.
        Md State Med J. 1965; 14 ([published Online First: 1965/02/01]): 61-65
        • Karlsson J.
        • Peterson L.
        Evaluation of ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale.
        The Foot. 1991; 1: 15-19https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-2592(91)90006-W
        • Niki H.
        • Aoki H.
        • Inokuchi S.
        • et al.
        Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.
        J Orthop Sci. 2005; 10: 457-465https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-005-0936-2
        • Wolters U.
        • Wolf T.
        • Stutzer H.
        • et al.
        ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome.
        Br J Anaesth. 1996; 77 ([published Online First: 1996/08/01]): 217-222
        • Charlson M.
        • Szatrowski T.P.
        • Peterson J.
        • et al.
        Validation of a combined comorbidity index.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47 ([published Online First: 1994/11/01]): 1245-1251
        • Parker M.J.
        • Palmer C.R.
        A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture.
        J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol. 1993; 75 ([published Online First: 1993/09/01]): 797-798
        • Hodek J.M.
        • Ruhe A.
        • Greiner W.
        Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität bei Multimorbidität im Alter.
        Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 2009; 52: 1188https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-009-0974-6
        • Watne L.O.
        • Torbergsen A.C.
        • Conroy S.
        • et al.
        The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo orthogeriatric trial).
        BMC Med. 2014; 12https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-63
        • Prestmo A.
        • Hagen G.
        • Sletvold O.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385 ([published Online First: 2015/02/11]): 1623-1633https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62409-0
        • Kristensen M.T.
        • Foss N.B.
        • Ekdahl C.
        • et al.
        Prefracture functional level evaluated by the new mobility score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery.
        Acta Orthop. 2010; 81 ([published Online First: 2010/05/11]): 296-302https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.487240
        • Gjertsen J.E.
        • Baste V.
        • Fevang J.M.
        • et al.
        Quality of life following hip fractures: results from the Norwegian hip fracture register.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17 ([published Online First: 2016/07/09]): 265https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1111-y
        • Gauthé R.
        • Desseaux A.
        • Rony L.
        • et al.
        Ankle fractures in the elderly: treatment and results in 477 patients.
        Orthopaed Traumatol: Surg Res. 2016; 102: S241-S244https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.001
        • Toole W.P.
        • Elliott M.
        • Hankins D.
        • et al.
        Are Low-energy Open ankle fractures in the elderly the New geriatric hip fracture?.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54: 203-206https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.10.015
        • Nilsson G.
        • Jonsson K.
        • Ekdahl C.
        • et al.
        Outcome and quality of life after surgically treated ankle fractures in patients 65 years or older.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8: 127https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-127
        • Lynde M.J.
        • Sautter T.
        • Hamilton G.A.
        • et al.
        Complications after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures in the elderly.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 18: 103-107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2011.03.010
        • Egol K.A.
        • Tejwani N.C.
        • Walsh M.G.
        • et al.
        Predictors of short-term functional outcome following ankle fracture surgery.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006; 88: 974-979https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00343
        • Kadakia R.J.
        • Hsu R.Y.
        • Hayda R.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of one-year mortality after geriatric ankle fractures in patients admitted to nursing homes.
        Injury. 2015; 46 ([published Online First: 2015/06/30]): 2010-2015https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.020
        • Zahn R.K.
        • Frey S.
        • Jakubietz R.G.
        • et al.
        A contoured locking plate for distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical cadaver study.
        Injury. 2012; 43 ([published Online First: 2011/08/05]): 718-725https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.009