Technical considerations to avoid delayed and non-union

      Abstract

      For many years intramedullary nails have been a well accepted and successful method of diaphyseal fracture fixation. However, delayed and non unions with this technique do still occur and are associated with significant patient morbidity. The reason for this can be multi-factorial. We discuss a number of technical considerations to maximise fracture reduction, fracture stability and fracture vascularity in order to achieve bony union.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Augat P.
        • Margevicius K.
        • Simon J.
        • Wolf S.
        • Suger G.
        • Claes L.
        Local tissue properties in bone healing: influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap.
        J Orthop Res. 1998; 16: 475-481
        • Bhandari M.
        • Tornetta P.
        • Sprague S.
        • Najibi A.
        • Petrisor B.
        • Griffith L.
        • et al.
        Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17: 353-361
        • Tornetta P.
        • Collins E.
        Semiextended position for intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 328: 185-189
        • Johnstone A.J.
        • Munro C.
        • Caba P.
        • Escriba I.
        • Forward D.
        • Graf M.
        The suprapatellar variant of the semi-extended surgical approach improves intramedullary nail position compared with the conventional medial parapatellar surgical approach.
        in: Presented at OTA Meeting, San Diego, October2015 (Unpublished work)
        • Leunig M.
        • Hertel R.
        Thermal necrosis after tibial reaming for intramedullary nail fixation.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1996; 78-B: 584-587
        • Karuppiah S.
        • Johnstone A.J.
        Distal locking in femoral intramedullary nailing system: is one cross screw sufficient.
        J Biomed Sci Eng. 2012; 5: 593-596
        • Karuppiah S.V.
        • Johnstone A.J.
        • Shepherd D.E.T.
        How cross screw lengths influence the stiffness of intramedullary nail systems.
        J Biomed Sci Eng. 2010; 2: 612-616
        • Krettek C.
        • Stephan C.
        • Schandelmaier M.
        • Richter H.
        • Pape C.
        • Miclau T.
        The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails.
        JBJS (Br). 1999; 81: 963-968
        • Lu C.
        • Miclau T.
        • Hu D.
        • Marcucio Ralph S.
        Ischemia leads to delayed union during fracture healing: a mouse model.
        J Orthop Res. 2007; 25 (): 51-61
        • Dickson K.F.
        • Katzman S.
        • Paiement G.
        The importance of the blood supply in the healing of tibial fractures.
        Contemp Orthop. 1995; 30 (): 489-493
        • Elliott K.G.B.
        • Johnstone A.J.
        Fracture distraction following intramedullary nail insertion: another significant risk factor for acute compartment syndrome.
        Bone Joint J. 2004; 86: 375
        • Stavrou P.Z.
        • Ciriello V.
        • Theocharakis S.
        • Gudipati S.
        • Tosounidis T.H.
        • Kanakaris N.K.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and risk factors for re-interventions following reamed intramedullary tibia nailing.
        Injury. 2016; 47: S49-S52
        • Metcalfe C.W.
        • Harrison W.D.
        • Nayagam S.
        • Narayan B.
        Negligence claims following non-union and malunion of long bone fractures: an analysis of 15 years of data.
        Injury. 2016; 47: 2312-2314
        • Fischer C.
        • Doll J.
        • Tanner M.
        • Bruckner T.
        • Zimmermann G.
        • Helbig L.
        • et al.
        Quantification of TGF-ß1, PDGF and IGF-1 cytokine expression after fracture treatment vs. non-union therapy via masquelet.
        Injury. 2016; 47: 342-349
        • Santolini E.
        • West R.
        • Giannoudis P.V.
        Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence.
        Injury. 2015; 46: S8-S19