Abstract
Objective
To determine the difference in infection rate between 24 h versus five days of prophylactic antibiotic use in management of Gustilo II open
tibia fractures.
Design
Unblinded randomized control trial.
Setting
Accident and Emergency, orthopedic wards and outpatient clinics at Kenyatta National
Hospital (KNH).
Patients
The study involved patients aged 18–80 years admitted through accident and emergency
department with Gustilo II traumatic open tibia fractures.
Intervention
Patients were randomized into either 24 hour or five day group and antibiotics started for 24 hours or five days after surgical debridement. The wounds were exposed and scored
using ASEPSIS wound scoring system for infection after 48 h, 5 days and at 14 days.
Outcome measures
The main outcomes of interest were presence of infection at days 2, 5 and 14 and effect
of duration to antibiotic administration on infection rate.
Results
There was no significant difference in infection rates between 24-hour and 5-day groups
with infection rates of 23% (9/40) vs. 19% (7/37) respectively (p = 0.699). The infection rate was significantly associated with time lapsed before administration
of antibiotics (p = 0.004).
Conclusion
In the use of prophylactic antibiotics for the management of Gustilo II traumatic
open tibia fractures, there is no difference in infection rate between 24 hours and five days regimen but time to antibiotic administration correlates with
infection rate. Antibiotic use for 24 hours only has proven adequate prophylaxis against infection. This is underlined in
our study which we hope shall inform practice in our setting. A larger, more appropriately
controlled study would be useful.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
PDF Download and 24 Hours Online AccessSubscribe:
Subscribe to InjuryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Surgical Infection Society guideline: prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures: an evidence-based guideline.Surg Infect. 2006; 7: 379-405
- Breaking with tradition: evidence-based antibiotic prophylaxis of open fractures.Surg Infect. 2006; 7: 327-329
J. Nanchahal, S. Nayagam, U. Khan, C. Moran, S. Barrett, F. Sanderson, et al., The British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) and the British Orthopaedic Association. (2009).
- Antibiotic prescription patterns in the management of open fractures at Mulago Hospital in Kampala.East Cent Afr J Surg. 2012; 17: 47-50
- Quantitative microbiology of traumatic orthopedic wounds.J Clin Microbiol. 1978; 8: 673-675
- Short duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in open fractures does not enhance risk of subsequent infection.Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B: 831-837
- Preventing surgical site infections.Exp Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2010; 8: 657-670
- Cost and morbidity associated with antibiotic prophylaxis in the ICU.J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 188: 225-230
- Sample size estimation in clinical trial.Perspect Clin Res. 2010; 1: 67-69
- Type III open tibia fractures: immediate antibiotic prophylaxis minimizes infection.J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: 1-6
- The effect of the timing of antibiotics and surgical treatment on infection rates in open long-bone fractures: a 9-year prospective study from a district general hospital.Injury. 2007; 38: 900-905
- Removal of surface bacteria by irrigation.J Orthop Res. 1996; 14: 251-254
- Wound irrigation in musculoskeletal injury.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9: 219-226
- Fluid lavage in patients with open fracture wounds (FLOW): an international survey of 984 surgeons.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 7
- Fluid lavage of open wounds (FLOW): a multicenter, blinded, factorial pilot trial comparing alternative irrigating solutions and pressures in patients with open fractures.J Trauma. 2011; 71: 596-606
- Aggressive treatment of 119 open fracture wounds.J Trauma. 1999; 46: 1049-1054
- A scoring method (ASEPSIS) for postoperative wound infections for use in clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis.Lancet. 1986; 1: 311-313
- Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study Group.Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1991; 73: 385-388
- How will surgical site infection be measured to ensure high quality care for all.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92: 1294-1299
- Repeatability of asepsis wound scoring method.Lancet. 1986; 1: 1208-1209
A.A. Asif. The effect of delay in initial debridement on the rate of infection in open fractures of the tibial shaft at Kenyatta National Hospital- A prospective study; a dissertation submitted in part fulfillment for the degree of Masters in Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery (M.Med Orthopaedic surgery) of the University of Nairobi. (2011).
J.K. Mogire. The management of fresh traumatic open tibial fractures at Kenyatta National Hospital; a dissertation submitted in part fulfillment for the degree of Masters in Medicine in General Surgery (M.Med General Surgery) at the University of Nairobi. (1995).
- Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (CD003764)
- Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58: 453-458
- Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators.J Orthopaedic Trauma. 1998; 12: 1-7
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: July 19, 2016
Accepted:
July 7,
2016
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
