Advertisement
Editorial| Volume 47, ISSUE 7, P1367-1368, July 2016

How can we improve the quality of trauma care and reduce harm, waste, and variation?

      Evidence based medicine incorporates the best research evidence with clinician knowledge and patient's values and preferences. However healthcare providers often fall short. ‘Bridging the quality chasm’ the 2001 report from the US Institute of Medicine (IOM), highlighted the issues of “overuse, underuse, and misuse” in healthcare [
      • Institute of Medicine
      Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
      ]. Of these, the evidence-practice gaps of “underuse” and “overuse” are likely to be substantial contributors to the preventable burden of harm from poor quality of care [
      • Glasziou P.
      • Haynes B.
      The paths from research to improved health outcomes.
      ]. Sometimes the gap is due to a failure of implementation. There are numerous examples where research evidence of benefit has taken years to be adopted in practice (e.g. crystalloid fluids for shock management). However, most care is delivered as a bundle where multiple processes all synergistically work towards patient outcomes. A study by Rayan et al. of 774 randomly selected patients with moderate to severe injuries admitted to US level one trauma centres, found only 53% of patients who met recognized clinical criteria received common trauma-specific processes of care [
      • Rayan N.
      • Barnes S.
      • Flemming N.
      • Kudyakov R.
      • Ballard D.
      • Gentilello L.M.
      • et al.
      Barriers to compliance with evidence-based care in trauma.
      ]. Using similar methodology, Shafi et al. found that after adjusting for potential confounders patients who received all recommended care were 58% less likely to die (OR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28–0.62) than those who did not [
      • Shafi S.
      • Barnes S.
      • Rayan N.
      • Kudyakov R.
      • Foreman M.
      • Cryer H.G.
      • et al.
      Compliance with recommended care at trauma centers: association with patient outcomes.
      ].
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Institute of Medicine
        Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        Washington Institute of Medicine, 2001
        • Glasziou P.
        • Haynes B.
        The paths from research to improved health outcomes.
        Evid Based Med. 2005; 10: 4-7
        • Rayan N.
        • Barnes S.
        • Flemming N.
        • Kudyakov R.
        • Ballard D.
        • Gentilello L.M.
        • et al.
        Barriers to compliance with evidence-based care in trauma.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72: 585-593
        • Shafi S.
        • Barnes S.
        • Rayan N.
        • Kudyakov R.
        • Foreman M.
        • Cryer H.G.
        • et al.
        Compliance with recommended care at trauma centers: association with patient outcomes.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219: 189-198
        • Dimick J.B.
        • Chen S.L.
        • Taheri P.A.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Campbell Jr., DA
        Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199: 531-537
        • Ivers R.Q.
        The role of epidemiology in improving the evidence base in injury prevention and trauma care.
        Injury. 2012; 43: 395-396
        • O’Reilly D.
        • Turabi A.E.
        • Coats T.
        • Willett K.
        Trauma research: an opportunity and a challenge.
        Injury. 2011; 42: 117-118
        • Donabedian A.
        The end results of health care: Ernest Codman's contribution to quality assessment and beyond.
        Milbank Q. 1989; 67: 233-256
        • Donabedian A.
        Evaluating the quality of medical care.
        Milbank Q. 2005; 83: 691-729
        • Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons
        Hospital and prehospital resources for optimal care of the injured patient.
        Bull Am Coll Surg. 1986; 71: 4-23
        • Shafi S.
        • Nathens A.B.
        • Cryer H.G.
        • Hemmila M.R.
        • Pasquale M.D.
        • Clark D.E.
        • et al.
        The trauma quality improvement Program of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209 (521–530.e1)
        • Hemmila M.R.
        • Nathens A.B.
        • Shafi S.
        • Calland J.F.
        • Clark D.E.
        • Cryer H.G.
        • et al.
        The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2010; 68: 253-262
        • Lambert S.M.
        • Markel H.
        Making history: Thomas Francis, Jr, MD, and the 1954 Salk Poliomyelitis Vaccine Field Trial.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000; 154: 512-517
        • Berwick D.M.
        Disseminating innovations in health care.
        JAMA. 2003; 289: 1969-1975
        • Sanson-Fisher R.W.
        • Bonevski B.
        • Green L.W.
        • D’Este C.
        Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 155-161
        • Raghupathi W.
        • Raghupathi V.
        Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential.
        Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014; 2https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-501-2-3
        • Institute of Medicine
        Olsen L. Aisner D. McGinnis J.M. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. National Academies Press, Washington, DC2007
      1. Collaboratory. NHCSR. Learning Healthcare Systems. Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Available at: http://sites.duke.edu/rethinkingclinicaltrials/informed-consent-in-pragmatic-clinical-trials/; 2014 [accessed 04.05.16].

        • Kärrholm J.
        The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se).
        Acta Orthopaedica. 2010; 81 (3-4)
        • Herberts P.H.M.
        Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71: 111-121