Advertisement

Are we failing our rural communities? Motor vehicle injury in British Columbia, Canada, 2001–2007

      Abstract

      In Canada, stratification by geographic area or socio-economic status remains relatively rare in national and provincial reporting and surveillance for injury prevention and trauma care. As injuries are known to affect some populations more than others, a more nuanced understanding of injury risk may in turn inform more effective prevention policy. In this study we assessed rates of hospitalization and death from motor vehicle collisions (MVC) in British Columbia (BC) by socio-economic status (SES) and by rural and urban status between 2001 and 2007. Excess risk in injury morbidity and mortality between different SES groups were assessed using a population attributable fraction (PAF). Over a six-year period rural populations in BC experienced a three-fold increase in relative risk of death and an average of 50% increase in relative risk of hospitalization due to injury. When assessed against SES, relative risk of MVC mortality increased from 2.36 (2.05–2.72) to 4.07 (3.35–4.95) in reference to the least deprived areas, with an estimated 40% of all MVC-related mortality attributable to the relative differences across SES classes. Results from this study challenge current provincial and national reporting practises and emphasize the utility of employing the PAF for assessing variations in injury morbidity and mortality.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. SMARTRISK. The economic burden of injury in Canada. Toronto, ON; 2009.

        • Angus D.E.
        • Cloutier E.
        • Albert T.
        • Chénard D.
        • Shariatmadar A.
        The economic burden of unintentional injury in Canada.
        SMARTRISK, Toronto, ON1998
        • Muelleman R.L.
        • Wadman M.C.
        • Tran T.P.
        • Ullrich F.
        • Anderson J.R.
        Rural motor vehicle crash risk of death is higher after controlling for injury severity.
        Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care. 2007; 62: 221-225
        • Muelleman R.L.
        • Walker R.A.
        • Edney J.A.
        Motor-vehicle deaths – a rural epidemic.
        Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care. 1993; 35: 717-719
        • Maio R.F.
        • Green P.E.
        • Becker M.P.
        • Burney R.E.
        • Compton C.
        Rural motor vehicle crash mortality: the role of crash severity and medical resources.
        Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1992; 24: 631-642
        • Baker S.P.
        • Waller A.
        • Langlois J.
        Motor-vehicle deaths in children – geographic variations.
        Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1991; 23: 19-28
        • Kmet L.
        • Macarthur C.
        Urban–rural differences in motor vehicle crash fatality and hospitalization rates among children and youth.
        Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2006; 38: 122-127
        • Haynes R.
        • Reading R.
        • Gale S.
        Household and neighbourhood risks for injury to 5–14 year old children.
        Social Science & Medicine. 2003; 57: 625-636
        • Cubbin C.
        • LeClere F.B.
        • Smith G.S.
        Socioeconomic status and injury mortality: individual and neighbourhood determinants.
        Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2000; 54: 517-524
        • Clark D.E.
        Motor vehicle crash fatalities in the elderly: rural versus urban.
        Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care. 2001; 51: 896-900
        • Sibley A.K.
        • Tallon J.M.
        Major injury associated with all-terrain vehicle use in Nova Scotia: a 5-year review.
        Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2002; 4: 263-267
        • Karmali S.
        • Laupland K.
        • Harrop A.R.
        • Findlay C.
        • Kirkpatrick A.W.
        • Winston B.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of severe trauma among status Aboriginal Canadians: a population-based study.
        Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2005; 172: 1007-1011
        • Bell N.
        • Schuurman N.
        • Hameed S.M.
        A small-area population analysis of socioeconomic status and prevalence of severe burn/fire-related injury in British Columbia, Canada.
        Burns. 2009; 35: 1133-1141
      2. Girotti M. Report of the trauma expert panel. Available from: www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/17000/272640.pdf; 2006 [accessed 29.06.11].

      3. BC Stats. Regional population estimates and projections: population projections to 2036 for BC. Available from: http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/data/popstart.asp; 2010 [accessed 18.10.10].

      4. Statistics Canada. Population estimates and projections. Available from: http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/101/cst01/demo62a-eng.htm; 2006, 2009-09-22 [accessed 22.04.10].

        • Bell N.
        • Schuurman N.
        • Oliver L.
        • Hayes M.V.
        Towards the construction of place-specific measures of deprivation: a case study from the Vancouver metropolitan area.
        The Canadian Geographer. 2007; 51: 444-461
        • Hanley J.A.
        A heuristic approach to the formulas for population attributable fraction.
        Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2001; 55: 508-514
        • Krieger N.
        • Chen J.T.
        • Waterman P.D.
        • Rehkopf D.H.
        • Subramanian S.V.
        Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the public health disparities geocoding project.
        American Journal of Public Health. 2005; 95: 312-323
        • SAS Institute Inc.
        SAS/STAT® version 9.2 of the SAS system for Windows: Copyright© 2008.
        SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA2009
        • Mackenzie S.G.
        • Pless I.B.
        CHIRPP: Canada's principal injury surveillance program.
        Injury prevention. 1999; 5: 208-213
      5. CHIRPP. Leading cause of death and hospitalization in Canada. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/injury-bles/chirpp/index.html; 2006.

        • CIHI
        National trauma registry report: hospital injury admissions 1998/1999.
        Canadian Institute for Health Information, Toronto2001
      6. PHAC. Leading causes of death, Canada, males and females combined. Ottawa. www.publichealth.gc.ca; 2005.

        • Cubbin C.
        • Smith G.S.
        Socioeconomic inequalities in injury: critical issues in design and analysis.
        Annual Review of Public Health. 2002; 23: 349-375
        • Simpson K.
        • Janssen I.
        • Craig W.M.
        • Pickett W.
        Multilevel analysis of associations between socioeconomic status and injury among Canadian adolescents.
        Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005; 59: 1072-1077
        • Joly M.F.
        • Foggin P.M.
        • Pless I.B.
        Geographical and socioecological variations of traffic accidents among children.
        Social Science & Medicine. 1991; 33: 765-769
        • Simons R.
        • Brasher P.
        • Taulu T.
        • Lakha N.
        • Molnar N.
        • Caron N.
        • et al.
        A population-based analysis of injury-related deaths and access to trauma care in rural-remote northwest british columbia.
        Journal of Trauma. 2010; 69: 11-19