Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 41, ISSUE 12, P1249-1255, December 2010

Overcoming barriers to secondary prevention in hip fracture patients: An electronic referral and management system for osteoporosis

      Abstract

      Background

      Numerous studies have shown that osteoporosis is both under diagnosed and under treated in patients with fragility fractures. We describe the use of an electronic automated referral system to enable multidisciplinary assessment and treatment of osteoporosis in patients admitted with fragility fracture of the hip.

      Methods

      An electronic referral system was developed from the hospital's trauma software database. This automatically refers patients admitted with fragility fracture of the hip to osteoporosis services. Data were collected prospectively from May to July 2007, when referral was dependent on members of the orthopaedic team and from August to October 2007, after the implementation of the electronic referral system. Primary outcomes were presence of a referral to osteoporosis services, organisation of bone density scan and follow up appointment in patients less than 75 years, and treatment with osteoporosis medication in patients greater than 75 years of age.

      Results

      There were a total of 90 patients, 47 in the non-intervention group and 43 in the intervention group. In the non-intervention group 8/47 patients (17%) were referred to osteoporosis services whilst 43/43 (100%) were referred in the intervention group. Of patients greater than 75 years, 10/32 (31.3%) were started on a bisphosphonate in the non-intervention group compared to 28/34 (82.4%) in the intervention group. Of patients less than 75 years, 1/15 (7%) in the non-intervention group had a DEXA scan booked and appropriate follow up arranged, compared to 7/9 (78%) in the intervention group. There was significant difference between both groups in all outcomes (p < 0.0001).

      Conclusion

      We present an electronic system which facilitates delivery of osteoporosis services and significantly improves management of osteoporosis in patients admitted with fragility fracture. We recommend the use of such programmes to facilitate multidisciplinary assessment and treatment of osteoporosis in orthopaedic trauma patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bero L.A.
        • Grilli R.
        • Grimshaw J.M.
        • et al.
        Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.
        BMJ. 1998; 317: 465-468
        • Bogoch E.R.
        • Elliot-Gibson V.
        • Beaton D.E.
        • et al.
        Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 25-34
        • British Orthopaedic Association
        The care of fragility fracture patients.
        BOA, London2003
        • Burge R.T.
        • Worley D.
        • Johansen A.
        • et al.
        The cost of osteoporotic fractures in the UK: projections for 2000–2020.
        J Med Econ. 2001; 4: 51-62
        • Chevalley T.
        • Hoffmeyer P.
        • Bonjour J.-P.
        • Rizzoli R.
        An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low-trauma fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13: 450-455
        • Colón-Emeric C.
        • Kuchibhatla M.
        • Pieper C.
        • et al.
        The contribution of hip fracture to risk of subsequent fractures: data from two longitudinal studies.
        Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 879-883
        • Colon-Emeric C.S.
        • Sloane R.
        • Hawkes W.G.
        • et al.
        The risk of subsequent fractures in community-dwelling men and male veterans with hip fracture.
        Am J Med. 2000; 109: 324-326
        • Cuddihy M.T.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Gabriel S.E.
        • et al.
        A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 695-700
        • Cuddihy M.T.
        • Gabriel S.E.
        • Crowson C.S.
        • et al.
        Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures.
        Osteoporos Int. 1999; 9: 469-475
        • Cuddihy M.T.
        • Gabriel S.E.
        • Crowson C.S.
        • et al.
        Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures.
        Arch Int Med. 2002; 162: 421-426
        • Delmas P.D.
        Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
        Lancet. 2002; 359: 2018-2026
        • Dolan P.
        • Torgerson D.J.
        The cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in the United Kingdom female population.
        Osteoporos Int. 1998; 8: 611-617
        • Dreinhöfer K.E.
        • Anderson M.
        • Féron J.M.
        • et al.
        Multinational survey of osteoporotic fracture management.
        Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16: S44-S53
        • Elliot-Gibson V.
        • Bogoch E.R.
        • Jamal S.A.
        • Beaton D.E.
        Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review.
        Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 767-778
        • Freedman K.B.
        • Kaplan F.S.
        • Bilker W.B.
        • et al.
        Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity?.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2000; 82A: 1063-1070
        • Gardner M.J.
        • Brophy R.H.
        • Demetrakopoulos D.
        • Koob
        • et al.
        Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. A prospective randomized trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 3-7
        • Gardner M.J.
        • Flik K.R.
        • Mooar P.
        • Lane J.M.
        Improvement in the under treatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A: 1342-1348
        • Grimshaw J.M.
        • Russell I.T.
        Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.
        Lancet. 1993; 342: 1317-1322
        • Grimshaw J.M.
        • Shirran L.
        • Thomas R.
        • et al.
        Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.
        Med Care. 2001; 39: II2-45
        • Harrington J.T.
        • Barash H.L.
        • Day S.
        • Lease J.
        Redesigning the care of fragility fracture patients to improve osteoporosis management: a health care improvement project.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 53: 198-204
        • Hawker G.
        • Ridout R.
        • Ricupero M.
        • et al.
        The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients.
        Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 171-178
        • Hunt D.L.
        • Haynes R.B.
        • Hanna S.E.
        • Smith K.
        Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 1339-1346
        • Juby A.G.
        • De Geus-Wenceslau C.M.
        Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13: 205-210
        • Kamel H.K.
        • Hussain M.S.
        • Tariq S.
        • et al.
        Failure to diagnose and treat osteoporosis in elderly patients hospitalized with hip fractures.
        Am J Med. 2000; 109: 326-328
        • Kanis J.A.
        • Delmas P.
        • Burkhardt P.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for diagnosis and management if osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone disease.
        Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 1028-1034
        • Kaufman J.D.
        • Bolander M.E.
        • Bunta A.D.
        • et al.
        Barriers and solutions to osteoporosis care in patients with a hip fracture.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 1837-1843
        • Khaw K.T.
        How many, how old, how soon?.
        BMJ. 1999; 319: 1350-1352
        • Klotzbuecher C.M.
        • Ross P.D.
        • Landsman P.B.
        • et al.
        Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis.
        J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15: 721-739
        • Majumdar S.R.
        • Rowe B.H.
        • Folk D.
        • et al.
        A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture.
        Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 366-373
        • Mauck K.F.
        • Cuddihy M.T.
        • Trousdale R.T.
        • et al.
        The decision to accept treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture: exploring the woman's perspective using a stage-of-change model.
        Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13: 560-564
        • McLellan A.R.
        • Gallacher S.J.
        • Fraser M.
        The fracture liaison service: success of a programme for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 1028-1034
        • McLellan A.R.
        • Gallacher S.J.
        • Fraser M.
        • McQuillian C.
        The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 1028-1034
      1. Osteoporosis—secondary prevention technology appraisals TA87. January. National Institution of Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2005
      2. National Osteoporosis Society. http://www.nos.org.uk/osteo.asp; 2009.

        • Patel V.P.
        • Raptis D.
        • Christofi T.
        • et al.
        Development of electronic software for the management of trauma patients on the orthopaedic unit.
        Injury. 2009; 40 ([Epub 13.2.09]): 388-396
      3. Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment.
        Royal College of Physicians, 1999
      4. Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment.
        RCP, London2001
        • Rozental T.D.
        • Makhni E.C.
        • Day C.S.
        • Bouxsein M.L.
        Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radial fractures. A prospective randomized intervention.
        J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 953-961
        • Sheehan J.
        • Mohamed F.
        • Reilly M.
        • Perry I.J.
        Secondary prevention following fractured neck of femur: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons practice.
        Ir Med J. 2000; 93: 105-107
        • Skedros J.G.
        The orthopaedic surgeon's role in diagnosing and treating patients with osteoporotic fractures: standing discharge orders may be the solution for timely medical care.
        Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 405-410
        • Streeten E.A.
        • Mohamed A.
        • Gandhi A.
        • et al.
        The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. Is automatic consultation needed?.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1968-1974
      5. www.nhfd.org.uk.

      6. www.riomed.com/products/fitos.html.