The article by authors CM Court-Brown and N Clement on the epidemiology of fractures
in patients aged 90 or more years is impressive.
1
This is the most extensive and detailed report on this theme executed to date, and
conclusions the data present are very interesting. Of the 7907 fractures presented
in 2000 at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and the Royal Hospital for Sick Children,
1
208 patients (which had 236 fractures (3.02%)) were 90 years or older. Of the 208
injured patients 88.5% were female and 11.5% were male. With this advanced age it
can be expected that there is a greater incidence of lower limb fractures, as shown
by the authors, 65.3%, in comparison to younger patients; whilst upper limb fractures
in the 90+ group in this research was 30.5%. Only 4.2% of fractures were associated
with the axial skeleton (spinal and pelvis). A simple fall caused 86.14% of the fractures
to the 90+ age group. The results of this epidemiologic study were expected in the
area of commonest fractures: proximal femoral fractures 56.2%, distal radial fractures
13.6% and proximal humeral fractures 8.1%. I was surprised, however, that the only
spinal fracture during the year was treated in a centenarian, because my experience
with spinal fractures with patients older than 90 is different. Usually these fractures
occur because of an osteoporosis change, and a precipitated fall often results in
fracture to more than one vertebra. The authors were more than likely correct when
they stated: “likely that there were many more spinal fractures that did not present
to hospital.” Similarly the authors present the interesting result that they treated
only three ankle fractures of 236 fractures during the year of patients 90 and older.
That not one case of ankle fracture or humeral diaphysis treated was unusual because
both of these types of fractures are seen in cases of falls (ankle fractures in 38.7%
of cases, and humeral diaphysis in 53.3%) in younger adults. In looking at the results
of CM Court-Brown and N Clement in this article I also noticed there were neither
any fractures to the patella, scapula, midfoot, toe phalanges, carpus, talus, calcaneus,
nor sesamoid bones. In my experience I have treated all these types of fractures in
older people, though not inside of 1 year, nor in great numbers. However over the
last year I have seen three patella fractures within the 90+ age group, of these two
were treated conservatively with a cast, and a 96-year-old male was operated on for
osteosynthesis of the patella. I have also treated several fractures of the calcaneus
sustained from a fall in patients older than 90, all were treated conservatively.
If the 90+ population continues in the UK to grow as the authors’ state, increasing
from 0.65% in 2000 to the estimated 1.2% in 2025, then the part of society this population
forms will continue to increase in importance and consequently more frequent fractures
in this age group will be seen.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to InjuryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Reference
- Four score years and ten: an analysis of the epidemiology of fractures in the very elderly.Injury. 2009; 40: 1111-1114
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.