Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 41, ISSUE 4, P360-364, April 2010

Is kyphoplasty reliable for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with vertebral wall deficiency?

      Abstract

      Background

      Vertebral compression fractures are a common clinical manifestation of osteoporosis. The introduction of kyphoplasty has allowed minimally invasive treatment of these fractures. However, in patients with loss of vertebral wall integrity, balloon kyphoplasty is contraindicated due to the possibility of extruding wall fragments into the canal and cement extravasation. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in patients with compromised vertebral walls using individualised surgical techniques to avoid cement extravasation.

      Methods

      Symptomatic vertebral fractures (59 fractures in 55 patients) were treated by kyphoplasty. In levels with compromised anterior vertebral walls, two distinct sequential applications of cement were performed to avoid anterior leakage. In levels that demonstrated posterior or lateral wall deficiencies, the cement was injected under live fluoroscopy to monitor lateral or posterior extravasation. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated by comparing pre- and postoperative anterior/middle vertebral body height and local kyphotic angle. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by comparing Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) values preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups.

      Results

      Symptomatic cement extravasation and complications after kyphoplasty were not observed. Vertebral height was restored and the mean kyphotic angle was improved. The mean VAS decreased significantly from pre-surgery to post-surgery, as did the ODI (p < 0.05).

      Conclusion

      Kyphoplasty is a safe, clinically effective treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fracture with peripheral wall damage when using individualised surgical techniques to prevent bone cement leakage.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bartolozzi B.
        • Nozzoli C.
        • Pandolfo C.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with multiple myeloma.
        Eur J Haematol. 2006; 76: 180-181
        • Cook D.J.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Adachi J.D.
        • et al.
        Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.
        Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36: 750-756
        • Dudeney S.
        • Lieberman I.H.
        • Reinhardt M.K.
        • et al.
        Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteolytic vertebral compression fractures as a result of multiple myeloma.
        J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 2382-2387
        • Fourney D.R.
        • Schomer D.F.
        • Nader R.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients.
        J Neurosurg. 2003; 98: 21-30
        • Gaitanis I.N.
        • Hadjipavlou A.G.
        • Katonis P.G.
        • et al.
        Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of pathological vertebral compressive fractures.
        Eur Spine J. 2005; 14: 250-260
        • Garfin S.R.
        • Reilley M.A.
        Minimally invasive treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures.
        Spine J. 2002; 2: 314
        • Koh Y.H.
        • Han D.
        • Cha J.H.
        • et al.
        Vertebroplasty: magnetic resonance findings related to cement leakage risk.
        Acta Radiol. 2007; 48: 315-320
        • Kuklo T.R.
        • Polly D.W.
        • Owens B.D.
        • et al.
        Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 61-65
        • Lin E.P.
        • Ekholm S.
        • Hiwatashi A.
        • et al.
        Vertebroplasty: cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body.
        Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 175-180
        • Melton III, L.J.
        Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 2S-11S
        • Mirovsky Y.
        • Anekstein Y.
        • Shalmon E.
        • et al.
        Intradiscal cement leak following percutaneous vertebroplasty.
        Spine. 2006; 31: 1120-1124
        • Pflugmacher R.
        • Kandziora F.
        • Schroeder R.J.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of pathological vertebral body fracture and deformity in multiple myeloma: a one-year follow-up.
        Acta Radiol. 2006; 47: 369-376
        • Phillips F.M.
        • Wetzel F.T.
        • Lieberman I.
        • et al.
        An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 2173-2178
        • Taylor R.S.
        • Fritzell P.
        • Taylor R.J.
        Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur Spine J. 2007; 16: 1085-1100
        • Yang H.L.
        • Wang G.L.
        • Niu G.Q.
        • et al.
        Using MRI to determine painful vertebrae to be treated by kyphoplasty in multiple-level vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study.
        J Int Med Res. 2008; 36: 1056-1063
        • Yang H.L.
        • Zhao L.
        • Liu J.
        • et al.
        Changes of pulmonary function for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty.
        J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007; 20: 221-225