Abstract
Background and objective
Occult hip fractures (OHF) occur in a minute population of patients. Diagnosis is
made via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or alternatively via bone scan. Very little
is known about the clinical characteristics of OHF patients. Our aim was to characterize
the clinical and long-term survival of OHF in elderly patients and to determine if
a certain subgroup of patients would benefit from an MRI investigation following normal
or equivocal radiography.
Methods
Twenty-nine OHF patients diagnosed by a bone scan during 1995–2004 were compared with
a control group of 94 randomly chosen hip fractured patients diagnosed by plain radiography
in the same hospital and during the same period.
Results
Mean age, women/men ratio, place of residence, comorbidities, cognitive and functional
status were similar in the OHF and control group. Twenty-two (75.9%) and 4 (13.8%)
patients in the OHF group had had subcapital and intertrochanteric fractures respectively,
vs. 41 (43.6%) and 47 (50%) in the control group (p = 0.003). Diagnosis delay in the OHF group was 16.8 ± 26.5 days vs. 2.5 ± 2.9 days (p < 0.001) in the control group. There were fewer operations and complications in the
OHF group compared to the control group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). During a 13-year follow-up, no differences in survival were
found between the two groups nor any differences between those operated on and those
who were not.
Conclusions
OHF patients have no distinctive clinical characteristics or long-term survival. The
delay in diagnosing OHF is too much long and is probably related to the high prevalence
of conservative treatment. MRI investigation is recommended whenever OHF are suspected
and surgical treatment is considered, in order to improve diagnosis and treatment.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to InjuryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The role of MRI in the diagnosis of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly.Injury. 2006; 37: 185-189
- Prevalence of traumatic hip and pelvic fractures in patients with suspected hip fracture and negative initial standard radio-graphs—a study of emergency department patients.Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 366-369
- “Mini-Mental State”—a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-198
- Risk factors correlated with post-operative mortality for hip fracture surgery in the elderly: a population-based approach.Eur J Epidemiol. 2005; 20: 985-991
- MRI diagnosis of occult hip fractures.Acta Orthop. 2005; 76: 524-530
- Morbidity and mortality after hip fracture: the impact of operative delay.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124: 334-340
- World-wide projections for hip fracture.Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7: 407-413
- Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 3: CD000337
- What is the role of timing in the surgical and rehabilitative care of community-dwelling older persons with acute hip fracture?.Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 513-520
- Radionuclide bone imaging in the early detection of fractures of the proximal femur (hip): multifactorial analysis.Radiology. 1990; 174: 509-515
- Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) necessary to exclude occult hip fracture?.Injury. 2007; 38: 1204-1208
- Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with hip fractures.J Bone Miner Res. 2005; 20: 494-500
- Assessing self-maintenance activities of daily living, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983; 31: 721-727
- MR imaging, bone scintigraphy, and radiography in bone stress injuries of the pelvis and the lower extremity.Acta Radiol. 2002; 43: 207-212
- Fractures and dislocations of the hip.in: Canale S.T. Beaty J.H. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. Mosby, Philadelphia2008: 3237-3308
- Early magnetic resonance imaging of radiographically occult osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck.Hong Kong Med J. 2004; 10: 271-275
- Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures MRI versus CT scan.Injury. 2005; 36: 788-792
- Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures.Am J Med. 1997; 103: 51S-64S
- MacKenzie CR et al. Hip fractures among the elderly: causes, consequences and control.Ageing Res Rev. 2003; 2: 57-93
- The 2004 Marshall Urist Award: delays until surgery after hip fracture increases mortality.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 294-301
- Prevalence and patterns of occult hip fractures and mimics revealed by MRI.AJR. 2004; 182: 283-288
- Does delay in surgery after hip fracture lead to worse outcomes? A multicenter survey.Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 170-176
- Missed hip fractures.Arch Emerg Med. 1992; 9: 23-27
- Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 34-42
- Diagnosis of occult fractures about the hip. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with bone-scanning.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 395-401
- Magnetic resonance imaging: a cost-effective alternative to bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of patients with suspected hip fractures.Skeletal Radiol. 1998; 27: 199-204
- Outcome of non-operative management in Garden I femoral neck fractures.Injury. 2006; 37: 974-978
- Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status.Osteoporos Int. 2007; 18: 1463-1472
- The advantages of MRI in the detection of occult hip fractures.Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 165-169
- Images in clinical medicine. Occult hip fracture.N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 26
- Hip fracture.N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1519-1525
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
August 17,
2009
Identification
Copyright
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
