Advertisement
Letter to the Editor| Volume 41, ISSUE 4, P430-431, April 2010

The European Standard testing method for motorcyclists’ protective clothing (EN 1621-1) is unsuitable for hip protectors

  • Pekka Kannus
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: UKK Institute, P.O. Box 30, FIN-33501 Tampere, Finland. Tel.: +358 3 282 9336; fax: +358 3 282 9200.
    Affiliations
    Injury & Osteoporosis Research Center, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland

    Medical School, University of Tampere, and Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Trauma, Musculoskeletal Surgery and Rehabilitation, Tampere University, Hospital, Tampere, Finland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jari Parkkari
    Affiliations
    Tampere Research Center of Sports Medicine, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Stephen Robinovitch
    Affiliations
    School of Engineering Science and Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
      The recent study of Holzer et al. described the results of mechanical testing of different hip protectors according to the The European Standard testing method for motorcyclists’ protective clothing (EN 1621-1).
      • Holzer L.A.
      • von Skrbensky G.
      • Holzer G.
      Mechanical testing of different hip protectors according to a European Standard.
      They concluded that soft hip protectors of the “energy-absorbing” type (especially their own AHIP protector and Astrosorb protector) were superior to hard hip protectors of the “energy-shunting” type in reducing impact force. However, the testing system employed by Holzer et al. is unsuitable for measuring and comparing the force reduction provided by various types of hip protectors, and therefore the conclusions of Holzer et al. are biased and misleading.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Holzer L.A.
        • von Skrbensky G.
        • Holzer G.
        Mechanical testing of different hip protectors according to a European Standard.
        Injury. 2009; (doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.02.005)
        • Kannus P.
        • Parkkari J.
        • Poutala J.
        Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study.
        Bone. 1999; 25: 229-235
        • Kannus P.
        • Parkkari J.
        • Niemi S.
        • et al.
        Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1506-1513
        • Koike T.
        • Orito Y.
        • Toyoda H.
        • et al.
        External hip protectors are effective for the elderly with higher-than-average risk factors for hip fractures.
        Osteoporosis Int. 2009; (Jan 10: Epubl ahead of print)
        • Laing A.C.
        • Robinovitch S.N.
        The force attenuation provided by hip protectors depends on impact velocity, pelvic size, and soft tissue stiffness.
        ASME J Biomech Eng. 2008; 130 (061005 (9 pages))
        • Lauritzen J.B.
        • Petersen M.M.
        • Lund B.
        Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures.
        Lancet. 1993; 341: 11-13
        • Parkkari J.
        • Kannus P.
        • Heikkilä J.
        • et al.
        Energy-shunting external hip protector attenuates the peak femoral impact force below the theoretical fracture threshold: an in vitro biomechanical study under falling conditions of the elderly.
        J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10: 1437-1442
        • Parkkari J.
        • Kannus P.
        • Heikkilä J.
        • et al.
        Impact experiments of an external hip protector in young volunteers.
        Calcif Tissue Int. 1997; 60: 354-357
        • Parkkari J.
        • Kannus P.
        • Palvanen M.
        • et al.
        Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.
        Calcif Tissue Int. 1999; 65: 183-187
      1. Robinovitch SN, Evans SL, Minns J, et al. Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing—an international consensus statement. Osteoporosis Int, in press.

        • van Schoor N.M.
        • van der Veen A.J.
        • Schaap L.A.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical comparison of hard and soft hip protectors, and the influence of soft tissue.
        Bone. 2006; 39: 401-407