Definition and classification of fracture non-unions

  • Jan Paul M. Frölke
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. J.P.M. Frölke, MD, PhD. Dept. of Surgery, Section Traumatotogy, 690, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 (0)243615339; fax: +31 (0)243540501.
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Section Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Peter Patka
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Section Trauma Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Summary

      Classifications in general provide relevant information for clinical purposes to compose a suitable treatment strategy and for research purposes to be able to define comparable study groups. Two distinct types of non-unions are described in the established literature. In the first type the ends of the fragments are hypervascutar or hypertrophic and are capable of biologic reaction. In the second type the ends of the fragments are avascular or atrophic and are inert and incapable of biologic reaction. Hypervascular as well as avascular non-unions may be complicated by the presence of infection, poor soft-tissue quality, short peri-articular fragments or significant deformity, demanding mu[ti-stage treatment strategies with concomitant worsened prognosis and subsequent increased frequency of amputation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Den Boer FC
        • Patka P
        • Bakker FC
        • Haarman HJThM
        Current concepts of fracture healing, delayed unions, and nonunions.
        Osteo Trauma Care. 2002; 10: 1-7
        • USFDA
        Guidance Document for the Preparation of Investigational Device Exemptions and Pre-market Approval Applications for Bone Growth Stimulator Devices. United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD1988
        • LaVelle DG
        Delayed union and nonunion of fractures.
        in: Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 10th edition. Mosby, Philadelphia, PA2003: 3125-3128
        • Naimark A
        • Miller K
        • Segal D
        • Kossoff J
        Nonunion.
        Skeletal Radiol. 1981; 6: 21-25
        • Hicks JH
        Rigid fixation as a treatment for non-union.
        Lancet. 1963; 2: 272-273
        • Sanders RA
        • Frederick HA
        • Hontas RB
        The Sauve-Kapandji procedure: a salvage operation for the distal radioulnar joint.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1991; 16: 1125-1129
        • Weber BG
        • Ĉech O
        Pseudarthrosis, Pathology, Biomechanics, Therapy, Results. Hans Huber, Bern1976
        • McKee MD
        Aseptic non-union.
        in: AO Principles of Fracture Management. Thieme, Stuttgart/New York2000: 749-754
        • Paley D
        • Catagni MA
        • Argnani F
        • et al.
        Ilizarov treatment of tibial non-unions with bone loss.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 241: 146-165
        • Judet J
        • Judet R
        L'ostéogénè et les retards de consolidation et les pseudarthroses des os longs.
        in: Huitième Congres SICOT. 1960: 15
        • Puranen J
        • Kivinitty K
        • Kaski P
        Strontium-85 profile counting in fractures of the tibial shaft.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1975; 46: 569-578
        • Cooper A
        A Treatise on Dislocations and Fractures of the Joints. Churchill, London1842
        • Pauwels F
        Grundriss einer Biomechanik der Frakturheilung.
        in: Verh Dtsch Orthop Ges 34. Kongress. 1940