Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 8, P729-734, October 2002

Do type B malleolar fractures need a positioning screw?

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00199-1
Do type B malleolar fractures need a positioning screw?
Previous ArticleRadiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb
Next ArticleIntercondylar fractures of the femur in the elderly: a treatment option

      Abstract

      Type B malleolar fractures (AO/ASIF classification) are usually stable ankle joint fractures. Nonetheless, some show a residual instability after internal fixation requiring further stabilization. How often does such a situation occur and can these unstable fractures be recognized beforehand?
      From 1995 to 1997, 111 malleolar fractures (three type A, 90 type B, 18 type C) were operated on. Seventeen out of 90 patients (19%) with a type B fracture showed residual instability after internal fixation (one unilateral, four bimalleolar and 12 trimalleolar fractures). Five of these patients showed a dislocation in the sagittal plane (anteroposterior) clinically or on the radiographs, five a dislocation in the coronal plane with dislocation of the tibia on the medial aspect of the ankle joint, and four an incongruency on the medial aspect of the joint. In three cases, no preoperative abnormality indicating instability was found. The fractures were all fixed using an additional positioning screw.
      In 11 patients, the positioning screw was removed after 8–12 weeks, in six patients removal was performed after 1 year along with removal of the plate. All 17 patients were reviewed 1 year after internal fixation, 16/17 showed a good or excellent result with identical or only minor impairment of range of motion of the ankle joint.
      Conclusion: Unstable ankle joints after internal fixation of type B malleolar fractures exist. Residual instability most often occurs after trimalleolar fractures with initial joint dislocation. Treatment with an additional positioning screw generally produced a satisfactory result.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer, 1990.

        View in Article

      2. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1991.

        View in Article
        • Heim D.
        • Schwab M.
        Qualitätssicherung: Die AO Dokumentation am peripheren Spital.
        Swiss. Surg. 1999; 5: 271-275
        View in Article

      4. Heim UFA, Pfeiffer KM. Internal fixation of small fractures. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1988.

        View in Article

      5. Danis R. Théorie et practique de l’ostéosynthese. Paris: Masson et Cie, 1947.

        View in Article
        • Heim D.
        • Heim U.
        • Regazzoni P.
        Malleolarfrakturen mit Gabelsprengung—Erfahrungen mit der Stellschraube.
        Unfallchirurgie. 1993; 5: 307-312
        View in Article
        • Heim U.F.A.
        Die Risse der membrana interossea bei Malleolarfrakturen. Ihre Bedeutung für Klassifikation und Operationstechnik.
        Hefte. Unfallheilk. 1983; 165: 247-250
        View in Article

      8. Heim U. Malleolarfrakturen mit Gabelsprengung. Doctoral Thesis. Switzerland: University of Basle, 1992.

        View in Article

      9. Schmid-Giovanoli C. Die Zerreissung der Membrana interossea bei Malleolarfrakturen. Ihr Vorkommen und ihre biomechanische Bedeutung. Doctoral Thesis. Switzerland: University of Zürich, 1980.

        View in Article
        • Xenos J.S.
        • Hopkinson W.J.
        • Mulligan M.E.
        • et al.
        The tibiofibular syndesmosis.
        J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1995; 77A: 847-856
        View in Article
        • Engelbrecht E.
        • Engelbrecht H.
        • Huynh P.L.
        Erfahrungen mit dem Syndesmosehaken bei tibiofibularen Bandverletzungen.
        Chirurg. 1984; 55: 749-755
        View in Article
        • Farhan M.J.
        • Smith T.W.D.
        Fixation of diastasis of the inferior tibiofibular joint using the syndesmosis hook.
        Injury. 1985; 16: 309-311
        View in Article
        • Yde J.
        • Kristensen K.D.
        Inferior tibiofibular diastasis treated by staple fixation.
        J. Trauma. 1981; 21: 483-485
        View in Article
        • Peter R.E.
        • Harrington R.M.
        • Henley M.B.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical effect of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques.
        J. Orthop. Trauma. 1994; 8: 215-219
        View in Article

      15. Ledermann M. Die Dynamik der distalen tibiofibularen syndesmose. Postdoctoral Thesis. Switzerland: University of Bern, 1983.

        View in Article

      16. Weissenberger BFJ. Die Stellschraube im Rahmen der Behandlung von Malleolarfrakturen. Doctoral Thesis. Switzerland: University of Zürich, 1989.

        View in Article

      17. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. Berlin: Springer, 1970.

        View in Article

      18. Henkemeyer H, Püschel R, Burri C. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Biomechanik der Syndesmose. Langenbecks Arch Chir, Suppl, Forum 1975. p. 369.

        View in Article
        • De Souza L.J.
        • Gustilo R.B.
        • Meyer T.J.
        Results of operative treatment of displaced external rotation-abduction fractures of the ankle.
        J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1985; 67A: 1066-1073
        View in Article
        • Leeds H.C.
        • Ehrlich M.G.
        Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures.
        J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1984; 66A: 490-503
        View in Article
        • Wilson Jr., F.C.
        • Skilbred L.A.
        Long-term results in the treatment of displaced bimalleolar fractures.
        J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1966; 48A: 1065-1078
        View in Article
        • Heim U.F.A.
        Trimalleolar fractures: late results after fixation of the posterior fragment.
        Orthopedics. 1989; 12: 1053-1059
        View in Article
        • Lauge-Hansen N.
        Fractures of the ankle. Part IV. Clinical use of genetic roentgen diagnosis and genetic reduction.
        Arch. Surg. 1952; 64: 488-500
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Accepted: October 24, 2001

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00199-1

      Copyright

      © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX