This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
The change in knowledge resulting from formal training in trauma management on two different courses was examined. Seventy-four doctors and a control group were included in this prospective study over a 2-year period. They represented participants on two Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses and four induction courses for junior doctors in Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments. The results indicate substantial benefits from both types of training. The ATLS course participants achieved better scores. Steps in constructing a simple test for the evaluation of courses are described. Standardization of approach is recommended. Assessment and audit of training in trauma management is feasible with limited resources. It may eventually be possible to measure individual clinician's proficiency against a standard scale.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Injury
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- The value of Abbreviated ATLS course for Accident and Emergency nurses.Accid Emerg Nurs. 1994; 2: 100
- Elementary Statistics in Social Research. Harper Collins, New York1991: 204 5th Ed.
- Teaching juniors practical procedures.Br Med J. 1991; 302: 729
- Constructing Achievement Tests. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey1982 3rd Ed.
Accepted: January 16, 1995
© 1995 Published by Elsevier Inc.