This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
The change in knowledge resulting from formal training in trauma management on two
different courses was examined. Seventy-four doctors and a control group were included
in this prospective study over a 2-year period. They represented participants on two
Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses and four induction courses for junior
doctors in Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments. The results indicate substantial
benefits from both types of training. The ATLS course participants achieved better
scores. Steps in constructing a simple test for the evaluation of courses are described.
Standardization of approach is recommended. Assessment and audit of training in trauma
management is feasible with limited resources. It may eventually be possible to measure
individual clinician's proficiency against a standard scale.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to InjuryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The value of Abbreviated ATLS course for Accident and Emergency nurses.Accid Emerg Nurs. 1994; 2: 100
- 5th Ed. Elementary Statistics in Social Research. Harper Collins, New York1991: 204
- Teaching juniors practical procedures.Br Med J. 1991; 302: 729
- 3rd Ed. Constructing Achievement Tests. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey1982
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
January 16,
1995
Identification
Copyright
© 1995 Published by Elsevier Inc.
