Advertisement
Paper| Volume 25, ISSUE 2, P99-104, March 1994

Download started.

Ok

Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      This study assesses the rigidity and strength of fixation provided by intramedullary and extramedullary devices for proximal femoral fractures. Stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures were studied in paired femora after internal fixation with the Gamma nail and Richards 135 ° classic hip-screw implants; in subtrochanteric fractures, the 95 ° Richards condylar screw was studied in addition. Subsidence of the sliding screw within the plate and nail constructs was measured. Fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary Gamma nail was significantly stronger and more rigid than that with the extramedullary screw plate devices. Under conditions of simulated protected weight bearing, the 95 ° condylar screw plate provided more rigid fixation than did the 135 ° hip screw.
      There was no significant difference in the strength of fixation of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures between the Gamma nail and the hip screw, although the Gamma nail provided more rigid fixation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Apel D.M.
        • Patwardhan A.
        • Pinzur M.S.
        • Dobozi W.R.
        Axial loading studies of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
        Clin. Orthop. 1989; 246: 156
        • Bonamo J.J.
        • Accettola A.B.
        Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a sliding nail-plate.
        J. Trauma. 1982; 22: 205
        • Bridle S.H.
        • Patel A.D.
        • Bircher M.
        • Calvert P.T.
        Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1991; 73B: 330
        • British Standards Institute
        Draft for development. Method for determination of endurance properties of stemmed femoral components of hip joint prostheses (DD91:1986).
        BSI, London1986
        • Calvert P.T.
        The Gamma nail — a significant advance or a passing fashion?.
        J. Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992; 74B: 329
        • Christie J.
        • Court-Brown C.
        • Kinninmonth A.W.G.
        • Howie C.R.
        Intramedullary locking nails in the management of femoral shaft fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1988; 70B: 206
        • Clark D.I.
        • Crofts C.E.
        • Saleh M.
        Femoral neck fracture fixation. Comparison of a sliding screw with lag screws.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1990; 72B: 797
        • Crowninshield R.D.
        • Brand R.A.
        • Johnston R.C.
        The effects of walking velocity and age on hip kinematics and kinetics.
        Clin. Orthop. 1978; 132: 140
        • Davis T.R.C.
        • Sher J.L.
        • Horsman A.
        • Simpson M.
        • Porter B.B.
        • Checketts R.G.
        Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1990; 72B: 26
        • Halder S.C.
        The Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1992; 74B: 340
        • Heyse-Moore G.H.
        • MacEachern A.G.
        • Jameson Evans D.C.
        Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A comparison of the Richards screw-plate with the Jewett nail-plate.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1983; 65B: 262
        • Holt Jr, E.P.
        Hip fractures in the trochanteric region: treatment with a strong nail and early weight bearing: a report of one hundred cases.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1963; 45A: 687
        • Jensen J.S.
        Trochanteric fractures. An epidemiologic, clinical and biomechanical study.
        Acta Orth. Scand. 1981; 188 (Suppl.): 1
        • Johnson L.L.
        • Lottes J.O.
        • Arnot J.P.
        The utilization of the Holt nail for proximal femoral fractures: a study of one hundred and forty-six patients.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1968; 50A: 67
        • Kaufer H.
        • Matthews L.S.
        • Sonstegard D.
        Stable fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1974; 56A: 899
        • Kyle R.F.
        • Gustilo R.B.
        • Premer R.F.
        Analysis of six hundred and twenty two intertrochanteric hip fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1979; 61A: 216
        • Larsson S.
        • Elloy M.
        • Hansson L.I.
        Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. A cadaver study of static and dynamic loading.
        Acta Orthop. Scand. 1987; 58: 365
        • Leung K.S.
        • So W.S.
        • Shen W.Y.
        • Hui P.W.
        Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1992; 74B: 345
        • Levy R.N.
        • Siegel M.
        • Sedlin E.D.
        • Siffert R.S.
        Complications of Ender pin fixation in basicervical, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the hip.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1983; 65A: 66
        • Mackechnie-Jarvis A.C.
        Femoral neck fracture fixation: rigidity of five techniques compared.
        J. R. Soc. Med. 1983; 76: 643-648
        • Mulholland R.C.
        • Gunn D.R.
        Sliding screw plate fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
        J. Trauma. 1972; 12: 581
        • Pankovich A.M.
        • Tarabishy I.E.
        Ender nailing of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Complications, failures and errors.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1980; 62A: 635
        • Paul J.P.
        Approaches to design. Force actions transmitted by joints in the human body.
        in: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol]. 192. 1976: 163
        • Puhl J.J.
        • Piotrowski G.
        • Enneking W.F.
        Biomechanical properties of paired canine fibulas.
        J. Biomechanics. 1972; 5: 391
        • Radford P.J.
        • Needoff M.
        • Webb J.K.
        A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1983; 75B: 789
        • Richards R.H.
        • Evans G.
        • Egan J.
        • Shearer J.R.
        The AO dynamic hip screw and Pugh sliding nail in femoral head fixation.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1990; 72B: 794
        • Rosenblum S.F.
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        • Kummer F.J.
        • Tan B.S.
        A biomechanical evaluation of the effects of the Gamma Nail.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 1992; 74B: 352
        • Royal College of Physicians
        Fractured Neck of Femur. Prevention and Management. RCP, London1989
        • Schatzker J.
        • Waddell J.P.
        Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
        Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1980; 11: 539
        • Seinsheimer F.
        Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
        J. Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1968; 60A: 300
        • Tencer A.F.
        • Johnson K.D.
        • Johnston D.W.C.
        • Gill K.
        A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
        J. Orthop. Res. 1984; 2: 297
        • Thomas W.G.
        • Villar R.N.
        Subtrochanteric fractures: Zickel nail or nail-plate?.
        J. Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1986; 68B: 255
        • Wile P.B.
        • Panjabi M.M.
        • Southwick W.O.
        Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures with a high angle compression hip screw.
        Clin. Orthop. 1983; 175: 72
        • Zickel R.E.
        An intramedullary fixation device for the proximal part of the femur. Nine years experience.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1976; 58A: 866