Research Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 6, P456-458, November 1991

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: range of movement following the posterior approach to open reduction

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      The posterior approach for open reduction of supracondylar fractures of the humerus has been condemned for causing decreased elbow movement. This study investigates this by comparing the range of movement in children treated by posterior open reduction and Kirschner wiring with those treated by closed reduction and immobilization. A total of 65 children with severely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures have been reviewed.
      There was some loss of movement in 66 per cent of the open reduction group and 42 per cent of the closed reduction group. The proportion losing more than 10 ° of movement was the same in both groups. The difference between the two groups was due to the increased numbers in the open reduction group who lost less than 10 ° of motion. Posterior open reduction of childhood supracondylar fractures is not associated with an important loss of elbow movement and need not be avoided on this account.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Carcassone M.
        • Bergoin M.
        • Homing H.
        Results of operative treatment of severe supracondylar fractures of the elbow in children.
        J. Pediatr. Surg. 1972; 7: 676
        • D'Ambrosia R.D.
        Supracondylar fractures of the humerus-prevention of cubitus varus.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1972; 54A: 60
        • Danielsson L.
        • Pettersson H.
        Open reduction and pin fixation of severely displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.
        Acta Orthop. Scand. 1980; 51: 249
        • Gruber M.A.
        • Hudson O.C.
        Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in childhood, and results of open reduction.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1964; 46A: 1245
        • Hart G.M.
        • Wilson D.W.
        • Arden G.P.
        The operative management of the difficult supracondylar fracture in the child.
        Injury. 1978; 9: 30
        • Kekomaki M.
        • Luoma R.
        • Rikalainen H.
        • et al.
        Operative reduction and fixation of a difficult supracondylar extension fracture of the humerus.
        J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1984; 4: 13
        • La Grange J.
        • Rignault P.
        Fractures supra-condyliennes.
        Rev. Chir. Orthop. 1962; 48: 337
        • Palmer E.E.
        • Niemann K.M.W.
        • Vesely D.
        • et al.
        Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1978; 60A: 653
        • Pirone A.M.
        • Graham H.K.
        • Kraybich J.
        Management of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1988; 70A: 641
        • Rang M.
        2nd Ed. Children's Fractures. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia1983: 157
        • Shifrin P.G.
        • Getring H.W.
        • Iglesias L.J.
        Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.
        Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1976; 7: 573
        • Walloe A.
        • Egund N.
        • Eikelund L.
        Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children: review of closed and open reduction leading to a proposal for treatment.
        Injury. 1985; 16: 296