Paper| Volume 22, ISSUE 4, P291-294, July 1991

Download started.


Assessment of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: an audit of clinical practice

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      The reliability of clinical assessment of the knee was evaluated in 203 patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Neither the mechanism of injury nor clinical symptoms were useful indicators of the type of pathology. Physical signs proved insufficiently sensitive in detecting abnormalities. Overall, the accuracy of clinical diagnosis was 80.8 per cent for the anterior cruciate ligament, 62.9 per cent for the medial meniscus and 74.9 per cent for the lateral meniscus.
      Accurate investigations allow arthroscopy to be targeted to those likely to obtain therapeutic benefit. Reliance upon clinical judgement alone would have resulted in an 89 per cent increase in arthroscopic procedures. Investigations such as MRI or arthrography are concluded to be cost-effective methods of avoiding unnecessary hospitalization, morbidity and waste of limited resources.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Injury
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bergstrom R.
        • Hamberg P.
        • Lysholm J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of open and endoscopic meniscectomy.
        Clin. Orthop. 1984; 184: 133
        • Boeree N.R.
        • Watkinson A.F.
        • Ackroyd C.E.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries of the knee.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1991; (accepted for publication)
        • Dumas J.M.
        • Edde D.J.
        Meniscal abnormalities: prospective correlation of double-contrast arthrography and arthroscopy.
        Radiology. 1986; 160: 453
        • Ireland J.
        • Trickey E.L.
        • Stoker D.J.
        Arthroscopy and arthrography of the knee.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1980; 62B: 3
        • Pavlov H.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Sherman M.F.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of double-contrast arthrographic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1983; 65A: 175
        • Polly D.W.
        • Callaghan J.J.
        • Sikes R.A.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1988; 70A: 192
        • Sherman O.H.
        • Fox J.M.
        • Snyder S.J.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopy — ‘no problem surgery’: an analysis of complications in 2640 cases.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68A: 256