What materials for dressings?

References

1. • Ayliffe G.A.J.
   • Green W.
   • Livingston R.
   • et al.
   Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dermatology in burn wards.
   J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1977; 30: 40
   • Google Scholar
2. • Alexander J.W.
   • Wheeler L.M.
   • Rooney R.C.
   • et al.
   Clinical evaluation of Epigard, a new synthetic substitute for homograft and heterograft skin.
   J. Trauma. 1973; 13: 374
   • Scopus (47)
   • PubMed
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
3. • Bailey H.
   • Bishop W.J.
   Notable Names in Medicine and Surgery. Lewis, London1972
   • Google Scholar
4. • Bergerot J.
   • Grignon J-L.
   • Apoil A.
   • et al.
   Pansement des dermabrasions et autres plaies tangentielles avec film plastique mince.
   Ann. Chir. Plast. 1977; 22: 305
   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. • Bergman R.B.
   A new treatment of split skin graft donor sites.
   Arch. Chir. Neerl. 1977; 21: 69
   • Google Scholar
6. • Bishop W.J.
   A History of Surgical Dressings. Robinson and Sons Limited, Chesterfield1959
   • Google Scholar
7. • Bothwell J.W.
   • Rovee D.T.
   The effect of dressings on the repair of cutaneous wounds in humans.
   in: Harkiss K.J. Surgical Dressings and Wound Healing. Crosby-Lockwood, London1971: 78
   • Google Scholar
8. • Breach N.M.
   • Davies D.M.
   • Yiacoumettis A.
   Study of effects of porcine skin and bovine dermis on the healing of split-skin graft donor sites in humans.
   Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1979; 63: 546
   • Scopus (14)
   • PubMed
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
9. • Bremner D.N.
   • Moffat L.E.F.
   • Lee D.
   Porcine dermis as a temporary ulcer dressing.
   Practitioner. 1977; 218: 708
   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. British Pharmaceutical Codex. The Pharmaceutical Press, London1973
    • Google Scholar
11. • Bryan C.P.
    The Papyrus Ebers. G. Bles, London1930 (Translated from German)
    • Google Scholar
12. • Bull J.P.
    • Squire J.R.
    • Topley E.T.
    Experiments with occlusive dressing of a new plastic.
    Lancet. 1948; ii: 213
    • Scopus (27)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
13. • Burleson R.
    • Eiseman B.
    Mechanisms of antibacterial effects of biologic dressings.
    Ann. Surg. 1973; 177: 181
    • Scopus (72)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
14. • Cannon B.
    • Cope O.
    Rate of epithelial regeneration.
    Ann. Surg. 1943; 117: 85
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
15. • Cason J.S.
    Aserbine.
    Prescrib. J. 1966; 6: 44
    • Google Scholar
16. • Chardach W.M.
    • Day C.E.
    • Fazekas G.
    • et al.
    Synthetic skin: an experimental study.
    J. Trauma. 1961; 1: 54
    • Google Scholar
17. • Chatterjee B.S.
    A controlled comparative study of the use of porcine xenograft in the treatment of partial thickness skin loss in an occupational health centre.
    Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 1978; 5: 726
    • Scopus (23)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
18. • Colebrook L.
    A New Approach to the Treatment of Burns and Scalds. Fine Technical Publications, London1950
    • Google Scholar
19. • Colebrook L.
    • Hood A.M.
    Infection through soaked dressings.
    Lancet. 1948; ii: 682
    • Scopus (18)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
20. • Colebrook L.
    • Duncan J.M.
    • Ross W.P.D.
    The control of infection in burns.
    Lancet. 1948; i: 893
    • Scopus (23)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
21. • Coombs V-A.
    • Nissen B.K.
    • Marks R.
    • et al.
    The influence of temperature on epidermal cell migration in vitro.
    Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1973; 54: 673
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. • Cruickshank C.N.D.
    • Trotter M.D.
    The oxygen uptake, glucose utilisation and lactic acid production of guinea-pig skin in relation to oxygen tension.
    Biochem. J. 1956; 62: 57
    • Scopus (12)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
23. • Cuthbertson D.P.
    • Tilstone W.J.
    Effect of environmental temperature on the closure of full skin thickness skin wounds in the rat.
    Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 1967; 52: 249
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. • Davenport P.J.
    • Dhooghe P.L.
    • Yiacoumettis A.
    A prospective comparison of two split skin graft donor site dressings.
    Burns. 1977; 3: 225
    • Scopus (8)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
25. • Davies J.W.L.
    • Lamke L-O.
    • Liljedahl L-O.
    A guide to the rate of non-renal water loss from patients with burns.
    Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1974; 27: 325
    • Scopus (20)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
26. • Davies J.W.L.
    • Lamke L-O.
    • Liljedahl L-O.
    Metabolic studies during the successful treatment of three adult patients with burns covering 80–85 per cent of the body surface.
    Acta Chir. Scand. Suppl. 1977; 468: 25
    • Google Scholar
27. Drug Tariff. Department of Health and Social Security, London1976
    • Google Scholar
28. • Eade G.G.
    The relationship between granulation tissue, bacteria and skin grafts in burned patients.
    Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1958; 22: 42
    • Scopus (70)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
29. • Ebell B.
    The Papyrus Ebers, The Greatest Egyptian Medical Document. Munksgaard, Copenhagen1937
    • Google Scholar
30. • Ekström E.H.
    The influence of different wound dressing on the healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites.
    in: Nordic Wound Healing Symposium. Lindgren and Soner, Gothenburg1980
    • Google Scholar
31. • Farmer A.W.
    • Maxmen M.D.
    • Chasmar L.R.
    • et al.
    Aluminium powder as a dry dressing in exposure treatment of thermal burns.
    Plast. reconstr. Surg. 1954; 14: 171
    • Scopus (2)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
32. • Gamgee J.S.
    Absorbent and medicated surgical dressings.
    Lancet. 1880; i: 127
    • Scopus (16)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
33. • Gentle M.
    Melolin trial.
    Nurs. Mirror. 1970; 131: 36
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. • Gilman T.
    Healing of cutaneous wounds.
    Glaxo. 1968; Vol. 31: 5
    • Google Scholar
35. • Gilman T.
    • Penn J.
    Skin wounds and surgical incisions: their effective closure with adhesive tape.
    in: Med. Proc.2. 1956: 1 (Suppl.)
    • Google Scholar
36. • Gilman T.
    • Penn J.
    I. Healing of incised wounds, with reference to epidermal reactions to sutures, and the pathogenesis of carcinoma in scars.
    in: Med. Proc.2. 1956: 1211 (Suppl.)
    • Google Scholar
37. • Gilman T.
    • Penn J.
    II. The healing of wounds involving loss of the superficial portions of the skin.
    in: Med. Proc.2. 1956: 150 (Suppl.)
    • Google Scholar
38. • Groves A.R.
    The continuing development of burns dressings.
    in: Surgical Dressings in the Hospital Environment. Surgical Dressings Research Unit, Welsh School of Pharmacy, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff1975
    • Google Scholar
39. • Groves A.R.
    Clinical problems involved in the selection of dressing material to promote the reharvesting of potential donor sites.
    in: Nordic Wound Healing Symposium. Lindgren and Soner, Gothenburg1980
    • Google Scholar
40. • Groves A.R.
    • Lawrence J.C.
    The tangential excision of burns: an experimental study using an animal model.
    Injury. 1971; 3: 30
    • Scopus (27)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
41. • Hannuksela M.
    • Väätäinen N.
    Nordic Wound Healing Symposium. Synthaderm in leg ulcers, a preliminary report. Lindgren and Soner, Gothenburg1980
    • Google Scholar
42. • Harkins H.N.
    The Treatment of Burns. Thomas, Illinois1942
    • Google Scholar
43. • Harris N.S.
    • Compton J.B.
    • Abston P.
    • et al.
    Comparison of fresh, frozen and lyophilized porcine skin as xenografts on burned patients.
    Burns. 1976; 2: 71
    • Scopus (22)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
44. • Hell E.
    • Lawrence J.C.
    The initiation of epidermal wound healing in cuts and burns.
    Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1979; 60: 171
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. • Herniman P.D.
    Skin sensitisation by surgical adhesives.
    in: Harkiss K.J. Surgical Dressings and Wound Healing. Crosby-Lockwood, London1971: 117
    • Google Scholar
46. • Hicks R.
    Toxicological problems of surgical dressing materials.
    in: Harkiss K.J. Surgical Dressings and Wound Healing. Crosby-Lockwood, London1971: 124
    • Google Scholar
47. • Hinman C.D.
    • Maibach H.I.
    Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human wounds.
    Nature. 1963; 200: 377
    • Scopus (562)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
48. • Hirshowitz B.
    • Moscona A.R.
    • Lefler E.
    Milton for the treatment of burns using the irrigation technique.
    Burns. 1979; 5: 282
    • Scopus (5)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
49. • Jackson D.MacG.
    Second thoughts on the burn wound.
    J. Trauma. 1969; 9: 839
    • Scopus (102)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
50. • Jackson D.MacG.
    • Lowbury E.J.L.
    • Topley E.
    Chemotherapy of Streptococcus pyogenes infections of burns.
    Lancet. 1951; ii: 705
    • Scopus (22)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
51. • Jackson D.MacG.
    • Lowbury E.J.L.
    • Topley E.
    Pseudomonas pyocyanea in burns.
    Lancet. 1951; ii: 137
    • Scopus (39)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
52. • James J.H.
    • Watson A.C.H.
    The use of Op-Site, a vapour permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites.
    Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1975; 28: 107
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. • Kaisary A.V.
    A temporary biological dressing in the treatment of varicose ulcers and skin defects.
    Postgrad. Med. J. 1977; 53: 672
    • Scopus (9)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
54. • Kamp H.F.
    • Watts J.C.
    Progressive debridement with control of insensible water loss in burns using a colloidal silicate dressing—a clinical observation.
    S. Afr. Med. J. 1967; 41: 651
    • Google Scholar
55. • Kidson A.
    • Lilly H.A.
    • Lowbury E.J.L.
    Flucloxacillin treatment of methicillin-‘resistant’ and sensitive staphylococcal infection.
    J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1979; 5: 359
    • Scopus (9)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
56. • Lawrence J.C.
    The comparative toxicity of antibiotics to skin.
    Br. J. Pharmacol. 1959; 14: 168
    • Google Scholar
57. • Lawrence J.C.
    Factors influencing skin metabolism as shown by tissue culture.
    in: Slome D. Wound Healing. Pergamon, Oxford1961: 32
    • Google Scholar
58. • Lawrence J.C.
    The effect of silver nitrate, sulfamylon and other antibacterial agents on the metabolism of mammalian skin.
    in: Pharmacological Treatment of Burns. Excerpta Medica, Int. Congress Series 190. 1969: 234 (Amsterdam)
    • Google Scholar
59. • Lawrence J.C.
    Storage and skin metabolism.
    Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1972; 25: 440
    • Scopus (30)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
60. • Lawrence J.C.
    The influence of dressings on the bacterial content and healing of burns.
    in: Abstracts of 4th International Congress on Burn Injuries, Buenos Aires1974: 94
    • Google Scholar
61. • Lawrence J.C.
    The perinecrotic zone in burns and its influence on healing.
    Burns. 1975; 1: 197
    • Scopus (17)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
62. • Lawrence J.C.
    Metabolism della pielle ed alterazioni indorte da farmaci, tossina e ageuti fisici.
    Recenti Prog. Med. 1976; 60: 233
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. • Lawrence J.C.
    The protection of damaged skin by temporary cover.
    in: Gibson T. van der Meulen Wound Healing, an International Symposium, Rotterdam 1974 Foundation International Co-operation in the Medical Sciences, Montreux1976: 208
    • Google Scholar
64. • Lawrence J.C.
    An experimental and clinical evaluation of a tulle gras dressing medicated with silver sulphadiazine.
    Burns. 1977; 3: 186
    • Scopus (13)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
65. • Lawrence J.C.
    The treatment of small burns with a chlorhexidine-medicated tulle gras.
    Burns. 1977; 3: 239
    • Scopus (21)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
66. • Lawrence J.C.
    The effect of Synthaderm and other dressing materials on the bacterial content of experimental wounds.
    in: Nordic Wound Healing Symposium. Lindgren and Soner, Gothenburg1980
    • Google Scholar
67. • Lawrence J.C.
    The treatment of minor burns with pig skin—a clinical trial.
    Nurs. Mirror. 1980; 150: 28
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. • Lawrence J.C.
    • Ricketts C.R.
    The metabolic uptake of sulphate ions by skin.
    Exp. Cell. Res. 1957; 12: 633
    • Scopus (12)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
69. Leading article.
    in: Wanted: a new wound dressing. Br. Med. J.2. 1979: 689
    • Google Scholar
70. • Lock P.M.
    The effect of temperature on the healing of experimental burns.
    in: Nordic Wound Healing Symposium. Lindgren and Soner, Gothenburg1980
    • Google Scholar
71. • Lowbury E.J.L.
    Fact or fashion? The rationale of exposure method, vaccination and other anti-infective measures.
    Burns. 1978; 5: 149
    • Scopus (12)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
72. • Lowbury E.J.L.
    Wits versus genes: the continuing battle against infection.
    J. Trauma. 1979; 19: 33
    • Scopus (38)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
73. • Lowbury E.J.L.
    • Hood A.M.
    A disinfectant barrier in dressings applied to burns.
    Lancet. 1952; i: 899
    • Scopus (3)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
74. • Macfie J.
    • Cowell M.
    • Pawsey G.
    • et al.
    A liquid alternative to gauze.
    Nurs. Mirror. 1979; 149: 30
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. • Martindale
    Wade A. The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 27th edition. The Pharmaceutical Press, London1977
    • Google Scholar
76. • Matthews D.N.
    Dressings of open wounds and burns with tulle gras.
    Lancet. 1941; i: 43
    • Scopus (2)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
77. • Maylard A.E.
    The antiseptic treatment of burns.
    Glasgow Med. J. 1892; 37: 1
    • Google Scholar
78. • McGregor I.A.
    Fundamental Techniques of Plastic Surgery. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1968
    • Google Scholar
79. • Melnikova V.M.
    Chemotherapy of Wound Injection in Trauma and Orthopaedics. Medicine, Moscow1975 (in Russian)
    • Google Scholar
80. • Moritz A.R.
    • Henriques F.C.
    Studies of thermal injury. II. The relative importance of time and surface temperatures in the causation of cutaneous burns.
    Am. J. Path. 1947; 23: 695
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. • Mummery R.V.
    • Richardson W.W.
    Clinical trial of Debrisan in superficial ulceration.
    J. Int. Med. Res. 1979; 7: 263
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

82. Nathan, P., Law, E. J., McMillan, B. G. et al. A new biomaterial for the control of infection in the burn wound. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif Int. Organs22, 30.

    • Google Scholar
83. • Organisation Of Medical Hygiene
    Organisation of Medical Hygiene, Anti-epidemic and Disinfection Measures for the Prevention of Hospital Infections in the CIASO and SRIASO.
    Central Institute of Accident Surgery and Orthopaedics, Moscow1977 (in Russian)
    • Google Scholar
84. • Owens N.
    Use of pressure dressings in the treatment of burns and other wounds.
    Surg. Clin. North Am. 1943; 23: 1354
    • Google Scholar
85. • Pepper F.J.
    Studies on the viability of mammalian skin autografts after storage at different temperatures.
    Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1954; 6: 250
    • Scopus (15)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
86. • Perrins D.J.D.
    Influence of hyperbaric oxygen on the survival of split skin.
    Lancet. 1967; i: 868
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
87. • Pirie W.
    On the use of carbolic acid in burns.
    Lancet. 1867; ii: 575
    • Scopus (5)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
88. • Ponten B.
    • Nordgaard J.O.
    The use of collagen film (Cutycol) as a dressing for donor areas in split skin grafting.
    Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1976; 10: 237
    • Scopus (13)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
89. • Remensnyder J.P.
    • Majno G.
    Oxygen gradients in healing wounds.
    Am. J. Path. 1968; 52: 301
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. • Scales J.T.
    The clinical evaluation of adhesive dressings and plasters.
    in: Harkiss K.J. Surgical Dressings and Wound Healing. Crosby Lockwood, London1971: 102
    • Google Scholar
91. • Scales J.T.
    • Winter G.D.
    The adhesion of wound dressings: an experimental study.
    in: Slome D. Wound Healing. Pergamon, Oxford1961: 54
    • Google Scholar
92. • Schilling R.S.F.
    • Roberts M.
    • Goodman N.
    Clinical trial of occlusive plastic dressings.
    Lancet. 1950; i: 293
    • Scopus (24)
    • Abstract
    • Google Scholar
93. • Shelley T.H.
    Developments in surgical dressings.
    in: Harkiss K.J. Surgical Dressings and wound Healing. Crosby-Lockwood & Son, London1971: 138-148
    • Google Scholar
94. • Soul J.
    A trial of Debrisan in the cleansing of infected surgical wounds.
    Br. J. Clin. Prac. 1978; 32: 172
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. • Silver I.A.
    Oxygen tension and epithelialisation.
    in: Maibach H.I. Rovee D.T. Epidermal Wound Healing. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago1972: 291
    • Google Scholar
96. • Simpson B.J.
    • Winter G.D.
    A method of studying the performance of dressings using a standard wound in the domestic pig.
    in: Harkiss K.J. Surgical Dressings and Wound Healing. Crosby-Lockwood, London1971: 70
    • Google Scholar
97. • Turner T.D.
    Hospital usage of absorbent dressings.
    Pharm. J. 1979; 222: 421
    • Google Scholar
98. • Turner T.D.
    Today's products and wound management.
    Nurs. Mirror. 1979; 149 (Suppl.)
    • Google Scholar
99. • Turner T.D.
    Products and their development in wound management.
    in: Nordic Wound Healing Symposium. Lindgren and Soner, Gothenburg1980
    • Google Scholar
100. • Turner T.D.
     • Morgan A.
     Dressings as barriers to micro-organisms.
     in: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the Infection Control Nurses Association, Canterbury1978: 37
     • Google Scholar
101. • Unger M.G.
     • Roberts N.
     Lyophilised amniotic membranes on graft donor sites.
     Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1976; 29: 99
     • Scopus (33)
     • PubMed
     • Abstract
     • Full Text PDF
     • Google Scholar
102. • Wicks C.J.
     • Peterson H.-I.
     Medicated wound dressings, a historical review.
     Puscula Med. 1972; 17: 90
     • Google Scholar
103. • Winter G.D.
     Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig.
     Nature. 1962; 193: 293
     • Scopus (1598)
     • PubMed
     • Crossref
     • Google Scholar
104. • Winter G.D.
     A note on wound healing under dressings with special reference to perforated film dressings.
     J. Invest. Dermatol. 1965; 45: 299
     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. • Winter G.D.
     Epidermal regeneration studied in the domestic pig.
     in: Maibach H.I. Reeves D.T. Epidermal Wound Healing. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago1972: 71
     • Google Scholar
106. • Winter G.D.
     Epidermal wound healing under a new Polyurethane foam dressing.
     Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1975; 56: 531
     • Scopus (34)
     • PubMed
     • Crossref
     • Google Scholar
107. • Winter G.D.
     Histological aspects of burn wound healing.
     Burns. 1975; 1: 191
     • Scopus (18)
     • Abstract
     • Full Text PDF
     • Google Scholar
108. • Wolfe J.J.
     • Noland J.L.
     • Cavanah M.S.
     The application of hydrostatic pressure to the burn injury, an experimental study.
     J. Trauma. 1962; 2: 262
     • Scopus (4)
     • PubMed
     • Crossref
     • Google Scholar
109. • Wood R.A.B.
     • Williams R.H.P.
     • Hughes L.E.
     Foam elastomer dressing in the management of open granulating wounds: experience with 250 patients.
     Br. J. Surg. 1977; 64: 554
     • Scopus (46)
     • PubMed
     • Crossref
     • Google Scholar