Injury
Volume 42, Supplement 5 , Pages S24-S27, December 2011

Patients' views and experience of intravenous and oral antimicrobial therapy: room for change

  • K.B. Bamford

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
    • Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Imperial College London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Professor Kathleen B. Bamford, Dept of Microbiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Ducane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
  • ,
  • M. Desai

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
    • Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Imperial College London, UK
  • ,
  • M.J. Aruede

      Affiliations

    • Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Imperial College London, UK
    • Department of Pharmacy, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, UK
  • ,
  • W. Lawson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
  • ,
  • A. Jacklin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
    • Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and The School of Pharmacy, University of London, UK
  • ,
  • B. Dean Franklin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
    • Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and The School of Pharmacy, University of London, UK

Abstract 

Little is known about patients' views or preferences about the route of administration of antimicrobials. In this study semi-structured interviews were carried out to assess patients' perceptions of an infection that required IV antimicrobial therapy in hospital, their preference for intravenous, IV followed by oral and discharge on oral therapy or home IV therapy. Interviews were transcribed and the content analysed.

Twelve patients were interviewed while in hospital or by telephone after discharge. Patients' information about their infection was incomplete and many expressed the view that they would like more information. Many patients expressed a preference for oral therapy over IV therapy although this was dependent on it being of equal efficacy. Contrary views were related to personal difficulty with tablets. Patients varied in their acceptance of home IV therapy and expressed concern about adequate support but the majority expressed a preference for being discharged on oral therapy once they were well enough.

Keywords:  Patient perspective , IV-oral switch , Antibiotic management , Antimicrobial therapy

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-1383(11)70129-2

doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70129-2

Injury
Volume 42, Supplement 5 , Pages S24-S27, December 2011