Injury
Volume 42, Supplement 5 , Pages S3-S6, December 2011

MRSA prevention strategies and current guidelines

  • F.M. Byrne
  • ,
  • M.H. Wilcox

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Professor Mark Wilcox, Microbiology, Old Medical School, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. Tel.: +44 113 392 6818; fax +44 113 392 2696

Department of Medical Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals & University of Leeds, UK

Abstract 

We review prevention strategies to minimise the risk of MRSA soft tissue and bone infections, which can be devastating for the patient and costly for the healthcare provider. Department of Health (England) policy is that screening for emergency admissions will be mandatory from 2011, in addition to existent elective admission screening. Rapid screening technology has not been shown to be cost-effective, meaning that there will be a lag time between admission and the patient's MRSA status being known. Thus, standard infection control policies regarding isolation of high-risk patients will remain, with a continuing focus on MRSA decolonisation, aimed at minimising the risks of auto-infection and transmission to other patients. Antimicrobial prescribing policies should be designed to take into account the local burden of resistant organisms, but also minimise unnecessary antibiotic use. There is an increasing realisation that reducing the use of fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins (which have been associated with increased carriage of MRSA) in patient populations where MRSA is prevalent can be a useful control measure. Prevention of orthopaedic infections clearly involves general operating theatre protocols, such as suitable antiseptic skin preparation, and additional measures including the use of laminar airflow. Antibiotic prophylaxis is adjusted in patients known to have MRSA to include a glycopeptide, and local guidelines may adopt such regimens for all patients due to the burden of MRSA in the local patient population. A future development that may have an effect on practice is the development of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine, which has been shown to be cost-effective in a computer-modelled evaluation.

Keywords:  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Infection , Prevention

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-1383(11)70125-5

doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70125-5

Injury
Volume 42, Supplement 5 , Pages S3-S6, December 2011