Injury
Volume 40, Issue 12 , Pages 1245-1251, December 2009

Management, complications and clinical results of femoral head fractures

  • P.V. Giannoudis

      Affiliations

    • Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Academic Unit, Clarendon Wing, Floor A, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. Tel.: +44 0113 3922750.
  • ,
  • G. Kontakis

      Affiliations

    • Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
    • University of Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • Z. Christoforakis

      Affiliations

    • University of Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • M. Akula

      Affiliations

    • Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
  • ,
  • T. Tosounidis

      Affiliations

    • University of Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • C. Koutras

      Affiliations

    • University of Crete, Greece

Accepted 15 October 2009.

Abstract 

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to investigate data regarding femoral head fractures, particularly focusing on their management, complications and clinical results.

Twenty-nine eligible articles, meeting prespecified inclusion criteria, reported on 453 femoral head fractures in 450 patients (mean age of 38.9 years with a mean follow-up of 55.6 months). 84.3% of patients had been victims of an automobile accident. The most widespread classification scheme used was that of Pipkin (65.4% of cases) whereas clinical results were evaluated mainly according to Thompson–Epstein criteria (63.3% of cases).

Fracture-dislocations, in their majority, were managed with emergent closed reduction, followed by definite treatment (closed or open), aiming at anatomic restoration of both fracture and joint incongruity. Regarding Pipkin 1 subtype, fractured fragment excision seems to give better results compared to ORIF (p=0.07), while for the more challenging Pipkin 2 fractures the principles of anatomic reduction and stable fixation should be applied. Wound infection was encountered with a rate of 3.2% of surgical cases and sciatic nerve palsy complicated 3.95% of fracture-dislocations. Major late complications included avascular necrosis (11.9%), post-traumatic arthritis (20%) and heterotopic ossification (16.8%).

Neither the trochanteric-flip nor the anterior approach seems to put in more danger the femoral head blood supply compared to the posterior one, with the former giving promising long-term functional results and lower incidence of major complication rates.

Keywords: Femoral fracture, AVN, Infection, Arthritis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-1383(09)00545-2

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.024

Injury
Volume 40, Issue 12 , Pages 1245-1251, December 2009