Injury
Volume 41, Issue 4 , Pages 370-373 , April 2010

Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A long-term follow-up of a randomised trial

,Accepted 2 October 2009.

References 

  1. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1972;54:61–76
  2. Crossman PT, Khan RJK, MacDowell A, et al. A survey of the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the UK. Injury. 2002;33:383–386
  3. Dorr LD, Glousman R, Sew Hoy AL, et al. Treatment of femoral neck with total hip replacement versus cemented and noncemented hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1:210–228
  4. Emery RJH, Broughton NS, Desal K, et al. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the femoral neck: a prospective randomised trial of cemented Thompson and uncemented Moore stems. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73B:322–324
  5. Nicoll EA. The unsolved fracture. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1963;45B:239–241
  6. Parker MJ, Gurusamy K. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Rev (The Cochrane Library). 2006;(4):[Chichester: Wiley]
  7. Parker MJ, Khan RJK, Crawford J, Pryor GA. Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2002;84B(8):1150–1155
  8. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1993;75B:797–798

PII: S0020-1383(09)00525-7

doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.003

Injury
Volume 41, Issue 4 , Pages 370-373 , April 2010