Injury
Volume 41, Issue 7 , Pages e21-e27, July 2010

Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures. A review of clinical studies

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece

Accepted 5 May 2009.

Abstract 

Functional bracing has been widely accepted as the gold standard for treating humeral shaft fractures conservatively. We conducted a literature review to verify the efficacy of this treatment method. Sixteen case series and two comparative studies fulfilled the criteria set. Analysis of these clinical studies showed that humeral shaft fractures when treated with functional bracing heal in an average of 10.7 weeks. Union rate is high (94.5%). Statistical analysis showed that proximal third fractures and AO type A fractures have a higher non-union rate although this is not statistical significant. Residual deformity and joint stiffness are considered the main drawbacks of conservative treatment. Angulation – usually varus – rarely exceeded 10°, while full shoulder and elbow motion was achieved in 80% and 85% of the patients, respectively. Nevertheless, in the few studies that subjective parameters such as functional scores, pain and quality of life were assessed results were not so promising.

Keywords: Humeral shaft fractures, Humeral diaphyseal fractures, Functional bracing, Functional treatment, Conservative treatment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-1383(09)00264-2

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.004

Injury
Volume 41, Issue 7 , Pages e21-e27, July 2010