Injury
Volume 40, Issue 10 , Pages 1049-1063 , October 2009

The clinical and radiological outcomes of the LISS plate for distal femoral fractures: A systematic review

  • T.O. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1603 286990; fax: +44 1603 287369.
  • ,
  • C. Hedges

      Affiliations

    • Physiotherapy Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, UK
  • ,
  • R. MacNair

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, UK
  • ,
  • K. Schankat

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, UK
  • ,
  • J.A. Wimhurst

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, UK

,Accepted 2 January 2009.

References 

  1. Albert MJ. Supracondylar fractures of the femur. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5:163–171
  2. Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finkemeier CG, et al. Operative stabilisation of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:834–839
  3. Apostolou CD, Papavasiliou AV, Aslam N, et al. Preliminary results and technical aspects following stabilisation of fractures around the knee with liss. Injury. 2005;36:529–536
  4. Beals RK, Tower SS. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;327:238–246
  5. Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ, et al. Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intrameduallty nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to an total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:876–881
  6. Borrelli J, Prickett W, Song E, et al. Extra osseous blood supply of the tibia and the effects of different plating techniques: a human cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:691
  7. Button G, Wolinsky P, Hak D. Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur. A report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:565–570
  8. CASP (Critical Skills Appraisal Programme) homepage on the Internet. Oxford, UK: Learning & Development Public Health Resource Unit; c2007 cited 2007 May 1. Available from: http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/critical_appraisal_tools.htm.
  9. Cebesoy O, Kose KC. Periprosthetic fractures of femur: LISS plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:427–428
  10. Cegoñino J, Aznar JMG, Doblaré M, et al. A comparison analysis of different treatments for distal femur fractures using the finite element methods. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2004;7:245–256
  11. Chen F, Mont MA, Bachner RS. Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:521–526
  12. Dunlop DG, Brenkel IJ. The supracondylar intramedullary nail in elderly patients with distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30:475–484
  13. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M. Systematic reviews of observational studies. In:  Egger M,  Davey Smith G,  Altman DG editor. Systematic reviews in health care. London: BMJ Books; 2001;p. 211–228
  14. Fankhauser F, Gruber G, Schippinger G, et al. Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (less invasive stabilization system). Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:56–60
  15. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity: preliminary results of a cadaver injection study. Injury. 1997;S-28:7–13
  16. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique?. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:401–406
  17. Figgie MP, Goldberg VM, Figgie HE, Sobel M. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:267–276
  18. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, et al. The development of the distal femur less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Injury. 2001;32:SC 24–SC 31
  19. Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate. Injury. 2007;38:965–972
  20. García JM, Doblaré M, Cegoñino J. Bone remodelling stimulation: a tool for implant design. Comput Mater Sci. 2002;25:100–114
  21. González YH, Martín AD, Sánchez FJ, Erasun CR. Early results with the new internal fixator systems LCP and LISS: a prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:60–69
  22. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58-A:453–458
  23. Hahn U, Prokop A, Jubel A, Isenberg J, Rehm KE. LISS versus condylar plate. Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2002;119:498–504
  24. Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures—results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury. 2004;35:517–522
  25. Healy WL, Siliski JM, Incavo SJ. Operative treatment of distal femoral fractures proximal to total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75-A:27–34
  26. Höntzsch D. Distal femoral fracture—technical possibilities. Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2001;118:371–374
  27. Huang H, Huang P, Su J, Lin SY. Indirect reduction and bridge plating of supracondylar fractures of the femur. Injury. 2003;34:135–140
  28. Kayali C, Agus H, Turgut A. Successful results of minimally invasive surgery for comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures with LISS: comparative study of multiply injured and isolated femoral fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:458–465
  29. Kanabar P, Kumar V, Owen PJ, Rushton N. Less invasive stabilisation system plating for distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2007;15:299–302
  30. Kobbe P, Klemm R, Reilmann H, Hockertz TJ. Less invasive stabilisation system (LISS) for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up. Injury. 2008;39:472–479
  31. Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, et al. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the less invasive stabilization system (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury. 2001;32:SC 32–SC 47
  32. Kregor PJ, Hughes JL, Cole PA. Fixation of distal femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty utilizing the less invasive stabilization system (L.I.S.S.). Injury. 2001;32:SC 64–SC 75
  33. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system. Surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:509–520
  34. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1997;28(Suppl. 1):A20–A30
  35. Kumar V, Kanabar P, Owen PJ, Rushton N. Less invasive stabilization system for the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:446–450
  36. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures. Are there differences in outcome and complications?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:252–257
  37. Marti A, Fankhauser C, Frenk A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:482
  38. Merkel KD, Johnson EW. Supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68-A:29–43
  39. Mize RD, Bucholz RW, Grogan DP. Surgical treatment of displaced, communited fractured of the distal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64-A:871–878
  40. Moran MC, Brick GW, Sledge CB, et al. Supracondylar femoral fracture following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1996;324:196–209
  41. Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of Internal fixation. Techniques reommended by the AOASIF Group. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990;
  42. Neer CS, Granthan SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar fractures of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967;49-A:591–613
  43. Ochsner PE, Pfister A. Use of the fork plate for internal fixation of periprosthetic fractures and osteotomies in connection with total knee replacement. Orthopedics. 1999;22:517–521
  44. O’Toole RV, Gobezie R, Hwang R, et al. Low complication rate of LISS for femur fractures adjacent to stable hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:203–210
  45. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-B:1093–1110
  46. Petrie A, Sabin S. Medical statistics at a glance. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2000;
  47. Ricci AR, Yue JJ, Taffet R, et al. Less invasive stabilization system for treatment of distal femur fractures. Am J Orthop. 2004;5:250–255
  48. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:209–214
  49. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis. In:  Rothstein HR,  Sutton AJ,  Borenstein M editor. Publication bias in meta-analysis. Prevention, assessment and adjustment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 2005;p. 1–7
  50. Schandelmaier P, Partenhemer A, Koanemann B, et al. Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilisation. Injury. 2001;32:SC 55–SC 63
  51. Schandelmaier P, Krettek C, Miclau T, et al. Stabilization of distal femoral fractures using the LISS. Tech Orthop. 1999;14:230–246
  52. Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C, et al. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury. 2001;32:SC 48–SC 54
  53. Schütz M, Müller M, Regazzoni P, et al. Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:102–108
  54. Syed AA, Agarwal M, Giannoudis PV, et al. Distal femoral fractures: long-term outcome following stabilisation with the LISS. Injury. 2004;35:599–607
  55. Younger AS, Dunwoody I, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic hip and knee fractures: the scope of the problem. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:251–256
  56. Weight M, Collinge C. Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA Types A2, A3, C2 and C3). J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:503–508
  57. Wick M, Muller EJ, Kutscha-Lissberg F, et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: LISS or retrograde intramedullary nailing? Problems with the use of minimally invasive techniques. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:181–188
  58. Wong M-K, Leung F, Chow SP. Treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly using a less-invasive plating technique. Int Orthop. 2005;29:117–120
  59. Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:494–502

PII: S0020-1383(09)00003-5

doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.005

Injury
Volume 40, Issue 10 , Pages 1049-1063 , October 2009