Journal Home
Search for

Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 873-875 (August 2009)


View previous. 18 of 25 View next.

Impact on trauma patient management of installing a computed tomography scanner in the emergency department

K.L. Leeabc, Colin A. GrahamabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jenny M.Y. Lamab, Janice H.H. Yeungab, A.T. Ahujac, Timothy H. Rainerab

Accepted 1 December 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Computed tomography (CT) plays a central diagnostic role for trauma patients. A 16-slice multi-detector CT scanner was installed in the emergency department (ED) of Prince of Wales Hospital in December 2004. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of the CT scanner within the ED on trauma management and to compare the utilisation patterns of trauma CT before and after the introduction of EDCT.

Methods

Analysis of prospectively collected trauma registry data. All consecutive trauma cases admitted through the ED that underwent CT between June 2004 and June 2005 (6 months before and after EDCT installation) were included. A positive CT was defined as the identification (by a specialist radiologist) of a significant finding which was consistent with injury.

Results

There were 226 and 202 trauma patients in the 6 months before and after EDCT installation, respectively. 111 (49.1%) patients underwent CT scanning before EDCT compared with 110 (54.5%) afterwards. 72 (65%) patients had CT scans performed before admission to definitive care compared with 99 (90%) after EDCT installed (p<0.0001, χ2 test). Mean time from arrival to first CT was shorter after EDCT (102min vs. 197min, p=0.011). Mean trauma room length of stay increased after EDCT was implemented (106min vs. 80min; p<0.001). Median time to urgent operation (<6h) was less with EDCT (134min before vs. 112min after). No changes in median time to neurosurgical operation (138min before vs. 148min after); mean length of stay (12.8 days before vs. 12.5 days after); or mortality (8 patients before vs. 7 patients after). There were 203 scans (1.8/patient) done before EDCT compared with 226 scans (2.5/patient) after. There was no difference in the number of scans done by body region or the proportion of positive scans (32% before vs. 30% after). Logistic regression confirmed that after adjusting for injury severity and admission physiology, time to first CT was shorter (p=0.0307) but ED length of stay was increased (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

After the installation of EDCT, more trauma patients had CT scanning before definitive care, and scans were done sooner, with no significant increase in the number of unnecessary scans.

a Accident & Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR

b Trauma & Emergency Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR

c Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Organ Imaging, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Accident & Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Trauma & Emergency Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR. Tel.: +852 2632 1033; fax: +852 2648 1469.

PII: S0020-1383(08)00538-X

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.001


View previous. 18 of 25 View next.