Injury
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 60-64, January 2007

“Awake” laparoscopy for the evaluation of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds

  • Jordan A. Weinberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • ,
  • Louis J. Magnotti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 901 448 3418; fax: +1 901 448 7306.
  • ,
  • Norma M. Edwards

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, United States
  • ,
  • Jeffrey A. Claridge

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Metrohealth Mecial Centre, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • ,
  • Gayle Minard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, United States
  • ,
  • Timothy C. Fabian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, United States
  • ,
  • Martin A. Croce

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, United States

Accepted 30 August 2006.

Summary 

Background

Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful for the assessment of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds, and has become the modality of choice for the evaluation of such wounds at our institution. We hypothesised that, in appropriate patients, diagnostic “awake” laparoscopy (AL) could be performed under local anaesthesia in the emergency department (ED), allowing for expedited discharge and potential cost savings.

Methods

Selected haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal injury underwent AL. Suitability for AL was at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Identification of peritoneal penetration by AL led to exploratory laparotomy in the operating room. Patients with no evidence of peritoneal penetration were discharged from the ED (ALneg). These patients were matched to a cohort of 24 patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in the OR which was negative for peritoneal penetration (DLneg). Length of stay and hospital charges were compared.

Results

Over a 30-month period, 15 patients underwent AL without complication. No peritoneal penetration was found in 11 patients. The remaining four patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, of which two were positive for intra-abdominal injury. Mean time to discharge was 7h in the ALneg group versus 18h in the DLneg group (p=0.0003). Cost savings on hospital charges averaged US$ 2227 per patient in the ALneg group compared with the DLneg group.

Conclusions

AL may be safely performed in the ED, allowing for expedited patient discharge. Cost savings are achieved by the avoidance of charges inherent to diagnostic laparoscopy performed in the operating room.

Keywords: Penetrating wounds, Laparoscopy

 

PII: S0020-1383(06)00566-3

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.061

Injury
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 60-64, January 2007