Injury
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 357-362, May 2003

Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

  • R.B. Simonis

      Affiliations

    • The Rowley Bristow Orthopaedic Unit, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Trust, Guildford Road, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • E.J. Parnell

      Affiliations

    • The Rowley Bristow Orthopaedic Unit, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Trust, Guildford Road, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
  • ,
  • P.S. Ray

      Affiliations

    • The Rowley Bristow Orthopaedic Unit, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Trust, Guildford Road, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
  • ,
  • J.L. Peacock

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health Sciences, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK

Accepted 11 July 2002.

Abstract 

Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bony non-union has been used in different forms for many years. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty about its efficacy. We, therefore, undertook a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial to try and determine its effect.

Over a period of 5 years, 34 consecutive patients with a tibial non-union met our “criteria for inclusion”. Each patient had an oblique fibular osteotomy, followed by a unilateral external fixator. They were then randomly allocated one of two machines. Group 1, the active group, received electrical stimulation from an active machine. Group 2, the dummy group, had an identical machine but without any current passing through the active coils. They were then followed up for 6 months and evaluated clinically and radiologically for bony union. Unfortunately, there was by chance, an imbalance in smoking habit between the two groups.

The union rate in the subgroup that smoked was 75% (6/8) in the active group as compared to 46% (6/13) in the dummy group. The active group of non-smokers had 100% (10/10) union rate, compared to 67% (2/3) in the dummy group.

Overall 24 out of the 34 patients progressed to union. Out of 18, 16 (89%) in the active group showed bony union as compared to 8/16 (50%) in the dummy. There was, thus, a statistically significant positive association between tibial union and electrical stimulation (odds ratio 8, 95% CI: 1.5–41, P=0.02).

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-1383(02)00209-7

doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00209-7

Injury
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 357-362, May 2003